No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

202 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 6 of 11

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2003

    Chavers v. Gatke Corp. (2003)

    …trial record also showed asbestos exposure during Navy service from 1958 to 1962. All defendants but Gatke Corporation and Owens-Illinois settled before trial. The plaintiffs admitted they had no evidence he used or worked around…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 26, 2003 · in the opinion

    Taylor v. John Crane, Inc. (2003)

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 14 Cal.4th 985, 60 Cal.Rptr.2d 103, 928 P.2d 1181 (Richards) that controls here. In Richards, the Supreme Court had occasion to consider the interplay between Proposition 51 and…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 3, 2016 · in the opinion

    Davis v. Honeywell International Inc. (2016)

    …Karst & Von Oiste and George H. Kim for Plaintiff and Respondent. CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION WILLHITE, Acting P.J. In Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford), the California Supreme Court addressed the…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 21, 2021 · in the opinion

    Ann Strobel v. Johnson & Johnson (2021)

    …25 Cal.4th at p. 850), which here is the preponderance of the evidence (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 965 (Rutherford)). "\On appeal "\[w\]e review a grant of summary judgment…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 30, 2019 · in the opinion

    Lopez v. the Hillshire Brands Company (2019)

    …was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2017 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. (2017)

    …was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2018 · in the opinion

    Trapp v. CertainTEED Corporation (2018)

    …In so doing, appellants are not "expected to prove the scientifically unknown details of carcinogenesis, or trace the unknowable path of a given asbestos fiber." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 976.…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 23, 2022 · in the opinion

    Bader v. Johnson & Johnson (2022)

    …with negligence, product liability, and concealment instructions that incorporated the asbestos-specific standard of proof for causation set forth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 \[67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16, 941…

  9. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · March 9, 2017 · in the opinion

    Zanowick v. Baxter Healthcare Corporation (2017)

    …the federal action with prejudice. The panel also held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting the Rule 41(a)(2) motion for dismissal without prejudice. OPINION OWENS, Circuit Judge. Defendants-Appellants…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Beckering v. Shell Oil Co. (2014)

    …347, 374, italics added.) Similarly, the Supreme Court of New Jersey unanimously found a duty to protect spouses from household asbestos exposure in Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (N.J. 2006) 895 A.2d 1143. Olivo…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 17, 2017 · in the opinion

    Phillips v. Honeywell International Inc. (2017)

    …L.Rev. 1153, 1161.) This characteristic underlies our Supreme Court's conclusion in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford) that "\[i\]n an asbestos-related cancer case, the plaintiff need not…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 19, 2021 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)

    …Dkt. No. 418 at 5. But Plaintiffs bear the burden of establishing that exposure to Defendants' products was a substantial factor causing his illness. See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal. 4th 953, 982 (Cal…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 16, 1987 · in the opinion

    Hughes v. Western MacArthur Co. (1987)

    …Fire Protection Dist. (1987) 43 Cal.3d 148, 153 \[233 Cal. Rptr. 308, 729 P.2d 743\]; Young v. Libbey-Owens Ford Co. (1985) 168 Cal. App.3d 1037, 1040, fn. 3 \[214 Cal. Rptr. 400\…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 15, 2014 · in the opinion

    Kesner v. Superior Court of Alameda County (2014)

    …Campbell that under Rowland and Cabral, a landowner owes no duty of care to those coming into contact with persons whose clothing carries asbestos dust from the landowner's premises. The claim against Ford Motor Company…

  15. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · August 3, 2021 · in the opinion

    Viale v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2021)

    …a triable issue of fact that Ronald was exposed to asbestos-containing Foster Wheeler products and therefore that exposure was a "substantial factor" causing Ronald's mesothelioma. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 941 P.2d 1203…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 18, 2013 · in the opinion

    Strickland v. Union Carbide Corp. (2013)

    …Zogarts (1975) 14 Cal.3d 104, 110.) Law Governing Proof of Causation in Asbestos Cases Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford) sets forth the controlling standard for proving causation in an…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 30, 2013 · in the opinion

    Catiller v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2013)

    …particular exposure was a substantial factor that is, "more than negligible or theoretical" in causing Edwards's malignant pleural mesothelioma. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 975-978.) Because of the discovery…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 22, 2008 · in the opinion

    Behshid v. Bondex International, Inc. (2008)

    …a substantial factor in causing Dr. Behshid's mesothelioma. This contention is not persuasive. Causation in asbestos cases In Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford), the Supreme Court held that the…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 15, 2019 · in the opinion

    Burch v. Certainteed Corporation (2019)

    …g., Bailey v. Central Vermont Ry., Inc. (1943) 319 U.S. 350, 352; Alber v. Owens (1967) 66 Cal.2d 790, 792; Thompson v. Atchison, T.&S.F. Ry. Co. (1950) 96 Cal.App.2d 974…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 18, 2013 · in the opinion

    Hernandez v. Amcord, Inc. (2013)

    …factor in causing Mr. Hernandez's mesothelioma to a reasonable degree of medical probability. The trial court cited Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 \[67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16, 941 P.2d…