135 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 6 of 7
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · March 5, 2019 · in the opinion
Rebbeck v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2019)
…there is an adequate alternative forum for the case where the defendant is amenable to service of process and the subject matter of the dispute may be litigated. Varo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 400 N.J…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 20, 2017 · in the opinion
Altman v. Ford Motor Co. (In re New York City Asbetos Litigation, 2017)
…Hayes, Lipe Automation Corp., Lucas Variety Automotive Holdings Co., Mack Trucks, Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., Navistar, Inc., Owens Illinois, Inc., Pneumo Abex Corp., Riley Power, Inc., Todd Shipyards Corp., Volvo Trucks North America, Inc., and…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 4, 2019 · in the opinion
Linsowe v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2019)
…To be considered a proximate cause of an injury, the acts of the defendant must have been a \substantial factor' in contributing to the injury. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 969…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 10, 2018 · in the opinion
Hake v. Allied Fluid Products Corp. (2018)
…was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 17, 2010 · in the opinion
Smith v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2010)
…At the most fundamental level, there is scientific uncertainty regarding the biological mechanisms by which inhalation of certain microscopic fibers of asbestos leads to lung cancer and mesothelioma." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 6, 2020 · in the opinion
Barr v. Parker-Hannifin Corp. (2020)
…no evidence that Kleinberg was ever exposed to asbestos or that he brought asbestos home on his clothing. Without evidence of exposure there is no causation. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 25, 2022 · in the opinion
Hahn v. New York Air Brake LLC (2022)
…cause of action against a manufacturer for asbestos-related latent injuries, a plaintiff must "establish some threshold exposure to the defendant's defective asbestos-containing products." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 4, 2012 · in the opinion
Bettencourt v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2012)
…context of products liability actions, the plaintiff must prove that the defective products supplied by the defendant were a substantial factor in bringing about his or her injury." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 25, 2014 · in the opinion
Lovelace v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2014)
…tortfeasors, we "resolve all conflicts in the evidence in favor of respondent, and indulge all legitimate and reasonable inferences in support of the judgment." (Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 471…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · June 21, 2021 · in the opinion
Petrie v. Novelis Corporation (2021)
…evidence of a quantified defendant-specific dose sufficient to show a doubling of the risk of contracting mesothelioma is not required. See ECF 58 at 16 (citing Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 941 P.2d 1203…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 7, 2005
Brown v. Crown Cork & Seal Company (2005)
Owen Brown, diagnosed with mesothelioma in October 2002, sued several companies, including Honeywell International, the successor to Bendix Corporation. He claimed he was exposed to asbestos from Bendix brake products while working at a service station…
-
Court case · New York Court of Appeals · October 27, 2005
Holdampf v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Matter of Nyc Asbestos Litig, 2005)
…lost. Under New York law, an employer or landowner owes no duty of care to an employee's household member allegedly injured by asbestos dust brought home on work clothes, because no relationship between the defendant…
-
Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 20, 2012
Union Carbide Corporation v. Fields (2012)
…the plaintiff's injury; inference, unverified allegations, or settled status alone are not enough. An employer owes no duty for take-home exposure, so it bears no allocable fault. Causation; Product Identification; Expert Testimony; Take-Home…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 20, 2019 · in the opinion
Rosen v. Genuine Parts Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state (CPLR § 302\[a\]\[1\]…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · May 12, 2017 · in the opinion
Stockton v. Ford Motor Company (2017)
…tenet of negligence law, stating that "Tennessee law currently provides that one owes a duty to refrain from engaging in conduct that creates an unreasonable and foreseeable risk of harm to others." Satterfield, 266 S.W…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · June 3, 2015 · in the opinion
Spychalla v. Boeing Aerospace Operations Inc. (2015)
…airworthiness status of an aircraft. (ECF Nos. 111-3 through 111-5, ¶ 5.) He explains that "Boeing owns or controls all manufacturing specifications for all Boeing aircraft\[,\]" (ECF No. 111-3, ¶ 6), and provides similar statements…
-
Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · February 29, 2012 · in the opinion
Kurns v. Railroad Friction Products Corp. (2012)
…Courtney C.T. Horrigan, David J. Bird, Robert H. Owen, Reed Smith LLP, Pittsburgh, PA, for Railroad Friction Products Corp. [\1262] Syllabus\[\\] George Corson worked as a welder and machinist for a railroad carrier. After retirement…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · April 15, 2015 · in the opinion
Stellar v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2015)
…585 Pa. 335, 888 A.2d 740, 746 (2005). Whether a defendant owes a duty of care to a plaintiff is a question of law in Pennsylvania. Kleinknecht v. Gettysburg Coll., 989 F.2d 1360, 1366…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · September 16, 2024 · in the opinion
Sorrentino v. Ammco Tools, Inc. (2024)
…industry custom or feasibility of design can be considered when the plaintiff opens the door by "present\[ing\] evidence that puts in issue the custom of the industry or feasibility of alternative design" as "the defendant…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · June 20, 2018 · in the opinion
Bechtel Corporation v. Batchelor (2018)
…possession and control of all or part of the plant such that it owed Mr. Batchelor the same duty that a landowner owes an invitee under the law of premises liability. For the reasons explained below…