No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

291 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 6 of 15

  1. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · December 11, 2008 · in the opinion

    Braaten v. Saberhagen Holdings (2008)

    …product which because of a defect or unsafe use is itself unsafe); Fricke v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 618 So.2d 473 (La.Ct.App. 1993) (manufacturer is not liable for inadequate warnings regarding a product…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc. (2009)

    …548, 568, fn. 5 \[34 Cal.Rptr.2d 607, 882 P.2d 298\]; Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 994 \[281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549\] (Anderson); Daly v…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 18, 2020 · in the opinion

    Whitehead v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)

    …that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 716 & n.2 (4th Cir. 1995) (applying the threshold causation standard outlined in Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 16, 2014 · in the opinion

    Dougherty v. AO Smith Corporation (2014)

    …federal defense; and (4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d Cir. 1998…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2019 · in the opinion

    Rickert v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2019)

    …1452, and Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753 to the extent they impose the "seriously inconvenient" burden on parties moving for a mere stay based on forum non conveniens\].) Moreover…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 24, 2023 · in the opinion

    Hutchins v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2023)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · January 27, 2021 · in the opinion

    Smith v. Schlage Lock Company, LLC (2021)

    …1985) ("We agree ... that at trial plaintiff's evidence must demonstrate that he was actually exposed to the alleged offending products."); see also Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prods., Inc., 69 F.3d 712…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 21, 2024 · in the opinion

    Pike v. Dempster Industries, Inc. (2024)

    …test"—to evaluate proximate causation in asbestos cases arising under North Carolina law. See, e.g., Prekler v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 60 F.3d 824 (table), 1995 WL 417731, at [\3] (4th Cir. July 6…

  9. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · May 10, 2017 · in the opinion

    Harris v. Deere & Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …336 S.E.2d at 66, 68 (N.C. 1985)). \[4\] Wilder, 336 S.E.2d at 68. \[5\] Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prod., Inc., 69 F.3d 712, 716 (4th Cir. 1995). \…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 17, 2021 · in the opinion

    Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …Va. 1948)). The Supreme Court of Virginia has recognized that in cases of asbestos exposure, "\[a\] plaintiff may prove exposure to a particular manufacturer's product through circumstantial evidence." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Watson, 413…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · November 10, 2016 · in the opinion

    French v. AW Chesterton Company (2016)

    …conduct performed under color of federal office; and (4) defendant raises a colorable federal defense to plaintiff's claim. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3rd Cir. 1998) (citing Mesa v…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Vinson v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)

    …is in accord with federal courts that have routinely reached the same conclusion. See, e.g., Haislip v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 86 F.3d 1150 (table), 1996 WL 273686, at [\2] (4th Cir. May 23…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)

    …is in accord with federal courts that have routinely reached the same conclusion. See, e.g., Haislip v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 86 F.3d 1150 (table), 1996 WL 273686, at [\2] (4th Cir. May 23…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · May 14, 1999 · in the opinion

    Spoonamore v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1999)

    …to evidence that links a John Crane product to Mr. Spoonamore's illness. Harris v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 102 F.3d 1429, 1433 (7th Cir.1996). In order to withstand a motion for summary judgment…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · September 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Hedden v. CBS Corporation (2015)

    …later diagnosis of a distinct malignant asbestos-related condition. The diagnosis of a malignant asbestos-related condition creates a new cause of action." Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 601 N.W.2d 627, 630 (Wis…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · December 27, 2022 · in the opinion

    King v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2022)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 3, 2004 · in the opinion

    Bartel v. John Crane, Inc. (2004)

    …has suffered damages; and, 3) prove that defendant's asbestos-containing product was a substantial factor in causing his damages. Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F.Supp. 172, 174 (W.D.Mich.1989); Stark…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 30, 2017 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Dock (2017)

    …the more lenient approach, it is sufficient if the plaintiff proves the defendant's product was at his or her work site." (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 655 (Dumin…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 4, 2021 · in the opinion

    Swanson v. The Marley-Wylain Co. (2021)

    …than one proximate cause of an injury" such that multiple "causes frequently operate concurrently so that \[they\] constitute a direct proximate cause of the resulting harm." (Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 225 Mich.App…

  20. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 28, 2017 · in the opinion

    Roverano v. John Crane, Inc. (2017)

    …identify "a reasonable basis for determining the contribution of each cause to a single harm." Restatement (Second) of Torts § 433A(1) (1965); see Martin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 515 Pa. 377, 528 A.2d 947…