111 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 6 of 6
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 18, 2003 · in the opinion
Kinsman v. Unocal Corp. (2003)
…to protect themselves against it, and \[¶\] (c) fails to exercise reasonable care to protect them against the danger." Thus, a landowner owes a duty to invitees to exercise reasonable care in maintaining the premises. (§ 343; see […
-
Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · August 23, 2007 · in the opinion
General Elec. Co. v. Cain (2007)
…a Ford engineer. They indicated that assembly lines, ovens, steel components, and extensive conveyor systems were necessary and essential to the manufacture and production of motor vehicles and that the dismantling of old assembly lines and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · July 16, 2014 · in the opinion
Sarradet v. the Dow Chemical Company (2014)
…upon a corporate officer or employee for breaching a duty arising solely because of the employment relationship.\[16\] Those criteria are as follows: The principal or employer owes a duty of care to the third person…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Kivell v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…is a distinction between hazards that are inherent in a defendant's premises (for which a premises owner owes a duty) and hazards inherent in an independent contractor's job (for which a premises owner does…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · May 25, 2022 · in the opinion
EL Paso Energy Est Company v. Chevron USA Inc. (2022)
…El Paso's defense costs in that suit. (Dkt. 41 at p. 4). "\[A\]s Chevron owes no duty to defend El Paso, it, a fortiori, has no duty to indemnify it." (Dkt. 41 at p…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 22, 1998 · in the opinion
Rareshide v. Mobil Oil Corp. (1998)
…The videos, which were proffered by Mobil, allegedly show Mr. Rareshide performing some tasks at the fishing camp he owns with two other individuals. He is seen painting, applying sealant, and sanding his fishing camp without…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · April 13, 2005 · in the opinion
Flanders v. California Coastal Communities (2005)
…Holdings, Inc., are pitted against each other. Each denies that it owns the liabilities of M.W. Kellogg. The trial court concluded that the plaintiff had made a prima facie case of jurisdiction against California Coastal…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2019)
…e have no basis to conclude in this diversity case that the Tennessee Supreme Court would overrule its prior decisions holding that a manufacturer owes no duty of care to consumers of products made by others…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · May 8, 2015 · in the opinion
Abutahoun v. Dow Chemical Company (2015)
…Chapter 95. Instead, the chapter uses the phrase "property owner," which section 95.001(3) defines to mean "a person or entity that owns real property primarily used for commercial or business purposes." TEX. CIV. PRAC…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · December 13, 2021 · in the opinion
Wright v. 3M Company (2021)
…landowner's premises. Id. The parties do not dispute Wright's status as an invitee. A landowner owes an invitee the duty of care set forth in the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 343 (Am Law Inst.
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 7, 2021 · in the opinion
Irani v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2021)
…to the plaintiff nor sits in a relation to the parties that creates an affirmative duty to protect the plaintiff from harm. . . the defendant owes no legal duty to the plaintiff." (Brown, at p. 216; accord…