Search

• Topic: take-home exposure ×
• Clear filters

113 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 6 of 6

1. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 8, 2005

   Zimko v. American Cyanamid (2005)

   …maintaining a dangerous asbestos workplace is only negligence. An employer owes a duty of reasonable care to household members of employees exposed to asbestos carried home on the employee's clothing or person. Causation; Expert Testimony…

2. Court case · Arizona Supreme Court · May 11, 2018

   Quiroz v. Alcoa Inc. (2018)

   …statutes), not on foreseeability or presumed risk creation. An employer therefore owes no duty to a worker's child for take-home asbestos, and the Third Restatement's duty framework is rejected. Take-Home Exposure; Wrongful…

3. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · May 12, 2017 · in the opinion

   Stockton v. Ford Motor Company (2017)

   …tenet of negligence law, stating that "Tennessee law currently provides that one owes a duty to refrain from engaging in conduct that creates an unreasonable and foreseeable risk of harm to others." Satterfield, 266 S.W…

4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · March 19, 2019 · in the opinion

   Mestas v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

   …A trial is the appropriate means to determine what obligations, if any, each Defendant owes to Plaintiffs, and Plaintiffs have not shown that they cannot obtain complete relief from any Defendant without the absent parties. Second…

5. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · July 16, 2015 · in the opinion

   Fletcher v. Water Applications Distribution (2015)

   …of Georgia "decline\[d\] to extend on the basis of foreseeability" the duty that an employer owes to provide a safe workplace to its employees to encompass potential liability for injuries sustained by any third party…

6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 7, 2025 · in the opinion

   Salvemini v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2025)

   …632 (1959) (emphasis added) Kermarec held that: "the owner of a ship in navigable waters owes to all who are on board for purposes not inimical to his legitimate interests the duty of exercising reasonable care…

7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 13, 2018 · in the opinion

   Aston v. Algoma Hardwoods, Inc. (2018)

   …expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …

8. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · April 6, 2023 · in the opinion

   Taylor v. BASF Catalysts, LLC (2023)

   …its subsidiaries was approximately $100 million. {¶ 11} Regarding Ester, Paro testified that Hallstar owns Ester, but that Ester is a subsidiary of Hallstar Solutions. He testified further that C.P. Hall's Stow warehouse became an…

9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 2012 · in the opinion

   Campbell v. Ford Motor Company (2012)

   …harm. "A person that owns property is negligent if he or she fails to use reasonable care to keep the property in a reasonably safe condition. A person that owns property must use reasonable care to…

10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 7, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)

    …corporate representative of Entergy New Orleans, Inc. ("Entergy"),\[20\] which owns and operates the Nine Mile Point plant. The deposition was taken as part of an asbestos case in Louisiana state court. In its reply memorandum…

11. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 11, 2007 · in the opinion

    Alcoa, Inc. v. Behringer (2007)

    …Siegler, 899 S.W.2d 195, 197 (Tex.1995) ("The threshold inquiry in a negligence case is whether the defendant owes a legal duty to the plaintiff."). If there is no legal duty, liability for negligence…

12. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Texas · March 21, 2011 · in the opinion

    In re Placid Oil Company (2011)

    …that have been sued by the Post-Confirmation Tort Claimants. \[25\] Placid is now a subsidiary of Occidental Petroleum Corporation and remains an active corporation that owns oil and gas interests. See Defendants' Exhibit 1-C…

13. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Texas · January 18, 2012 · in the opinion

    In re Placid Oil Company (2012)

    …that have been sued by the Post-Confirmation Tort Claimants. \[27\] Placid is now a subsidiary of Occidental Petroleum Corporation and remains an active corporation that owns oil and gas interests. See Defendants' Exhibit 1-C…