No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

112 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 6 of 6

  1. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 20, 2012

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Fields (2012)

    …the plaintiff's injury; inference, unverified allegations, or settled status alone are not enough. An employer owes no duty for take-home exposure, so it bears no allocable fault. Causation; Product Identification; Expert Testimony; Take-Home…

  2. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 8, 2005

    Zimko v. American Cyanamid (2005)

    …maintaining a dangerous asbestos workplace is only negligence. An employer owes a duty of reasonable care to household members of employees exposed to asbestos carried home on the employee's clothing or person. Causation; Expert Testimony…

  3. Court case · Arizona Supreme Court · May 11, 2018

    Quiroz v. Alcoa Inc. (2018)

    …statutes), not on foreseeability or presumed risk creation. An employer therefore owes no duty to a worker's child for take-home asbestos, and the Third Restatement's duty framework is rejected. Take-Home Exposure; Wrongful…

  4. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · May 12, 2017 · in the opinion

    Stockton v. Ford Motor Company (2017)

    …tenet of negligence law, stating that "Tennessee law currently provides that one owes a duty to refrain from engaging in conduct that creates an unreasonable and foreseeable risk of harm to others." Satterfield, 266 S.W…

  5. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · July 16, 2015 · in the opinion

    Fletcher v. Water Applications Distribution (2015)

    …of Georgia "decline\[d\] to extend on the basis of foreseeability" the duty that an employer owes to provide a safe workplace to its employees to encompass potential liability for injuries sustained by any third party…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 7, 2025 · in the opinion

    Salvemini v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2025)

    …632 (1959) (emphasis added) Kermarec held that: "the owner of a ship in navigable waters owes to all who are on board for purposes not inimical to his legitimate interests the duty of exercising reasonable care…

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 13, 2018 · in the opinion

    Aston v. Algoma Hardwoods, Inc. (2018)

    …expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 2012 · in the opinion

    Campbell v. Ford Motor Company (2012)

    …harm. "A person that owns property is negligent if he or she fails to use reasonable care to keep the property in a reasonably safe condition. A person that owns property must use reasonable care to…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 7, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)

    …corporate representative of Entergy New Orleans, Inc. ("Entergy"),\[20\] which owns and operates the Nine Mile Point plant. The deposition was taken as part of an asbestos case in Louisiana state court. In its reply memorandum…

  10. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 11, 2007 · in the opinion

    Alcoa, Inc. v. Behringer (2007)

    …Siegler, 899 S.W.2d 195, 197 (Tex.1995) ("The threshold inquiry in a negligence case is whether the defendant owes a legal duty to the plaintiff."). If there is no legal duty, liability for negligence…

  11. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Texas · March 21, 2011 · in the opinion

    In re Placid Oil Company (2011)

    …that have been sued by the Post-Confirmation Tort Claimants. \[25\] Placid is now a subsidiary of Occidental Petroleum Corporation and remains an active corporation that owns oil and gas interests. See Defendants' Exhibit 1-C…

  12. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Texas · January 18, 2012 · in the opinion

    In re Placid Oil Company (2012)

    …that have been sued by the Post-Confirmation Tort Claimants. \[27\] Placid is now a subsidiary of Occidental Petroleum Corporation and remains an active corporation that owns oil and gas interests. See Defendants' Exhibit 1-C…