No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

122 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”, page 6 of 7

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 10, 2015 · in the opinion

    Green v. CertainTEED Corporation (2015)

    …burden, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to show the existence of a triable issue of material fact as to that cause of action. (Union Bank v. Superior Court (1995) 31 Cal.App.4th 573, 583…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 20, 2012 · in the opinion

    Palomares v. Thomas Dee Engineering Company (2012)

    …negligence and strict liability claims. (See, e.g., Christoff v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. (2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 118, 126 \[indicating causation is an essential element of a negligence claim\]; Hunter v. Pacific Mechanical Corp…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 3, 1998 · in the opinion

    Scheiding v. General Motors Corp. (1998)

    …for his asbestos injuries and for his wife's loss of consortium. Billy Umphriss was employed as an engine supplyman and fireman for the Union Pacific Railroad from 1941 through 1942 and from 1950 through 1961…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 26, 2014 · in the opinion

    Boyd v. Super. CT. OF Alameda County (2014)

    …this is a mandatory preference. (See Landry v. Berryessa Union School Dist. (1995) 39 Cal.App.4th 691, 696-697.)\[2\] There is no question that Boyd is over 70 years old and has a substantial…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 26, 2018 · in the opinion

    Hart v. Keenan Properties, Inc. (2018)

    …must comply with the rules governing the admissibility of evidence generally, including ... the hearsay rule...." (Dart Industries, Inc. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. (2002) 28 Cal.4th 1059, 1070, fn. 2 \[124 Cal.Rptr.2d 142…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 27, 2016 · in the opinion

    Gerlach v. Goodman Lumber Company (2016)

    …burden, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to show the existence of a triable issue of material fact as to that cause of action. (Union Bank v. Superior Court (1995) 31 Cal.App.4th 573, 583…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc. (2009)

    …in a different factual context. The defendant in Blackwell sold sulfuric acid to McKesson Chemical Company, which shipped the acid to its plant in a tank car designed and owned by Union Tank. (Id. at p…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 15, 2019 · in the opinion

    Burch v. Certainteed Corporation (2019)

    …they were judicially construed in 1986 to apply to strict product liability cases\].) To the extent ambiguity exists, Proposition 51's ballot materials also aid our construction. (See Amador Valley Joint Union High Sch. Dist. v…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 23, 1996 · in the opinion

    Kellogg v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (1996)

    41 Cal.App.4th 1397 (1996) 49 Cal. Rptr.2d 256 IDA MAY KELLOGG et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. A050344. January 23, 1996. Court of Appeals of…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2023 · in the opinion

    Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc. (2023)

    …words, plaintiffs may proffer evidence regarding "the amount of exposure" or "the duration of such exposure." Id. at 1176-77 (emphasis in original); see also Stephens v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 935 F.3d 852…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 10, 2006 · in the opinion

    Boyle v. Certainteed Corporation (2006)

    FRANCES BOYLE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CERTAINTEED CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent. A108301 March 10, 2006 Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Four Steven M. Harowitz, Stephen M. Tigerman, Marileni Mattis Bryce C…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 27, 2019 · in the opinion

    Schildknegt v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp. (2019)

    BRIGITTE SCHILDKNEGT, Individually and as successor in interest to NICOLAAS SCHILDKNEGT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, etal., Defendants and Respondents. No. B255135. Filed June 27, 2019. Court of Appeals of California, Second…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 30, 2017 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Dock (2017)

    …burden, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to show the existence of a triable issue of material fact as to that cause of action. (Union Bank v. Superior Court (1995) 31 Cal.App.4th 573, 583…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 28, 2020 · in the opinion

    Sabetian v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2020)

    …To avoid possible influence from the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United States "devised a plan in which a consortium of newly-formed international corporations would operate the Abadan refinery and some of the…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 1, 2023 · in the opinion

    Haeck v. 3M Company (2023)

    …copy of Plaintiffs' proposed statement. See Stewart Decl., Ex. 20 (Proposed Statement of the Case). In that document, Plaintiffs stated that "Defendants are Foster Wheeler Corporation, J.T. Thorpe & Son, Inc., and Honeywell International, Inc." Id…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 18, 2011 · in the opinion

    Fontes v. Interstate Brands Corporation (2011)

    …(2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 1260, 1272-1273; Silva v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. (2000) 85 Cal.App.4th 1024, 1028-1030), we need not reach that issue because of our conclusion that the Fonteses failed…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · July 11, 2022 · in the opinion

    Shelton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)

    FRANK J. SHELTON, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, ET AL., Defendants. Case No. 4:21-cv-04772-YGR. July 11, 2022. United States District Court, N.D. California. ORDER GRANTING JOINT DEFENSE MOTION…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 7, 2021 · in the opinion

    Irani v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2021)

    …global oil markets and avoid possible influence from the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United States "devised a plan for a consortium of Western corporations to support the Iranian Government in running its oil…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 20, 2021 · in the opinion

    Khosravan v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2021)

    MALEKEH KHOSRAVAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. B304346. Filed April 20, 2021. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven. APPEAL from the judgment of the Superior…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · May 13, 2021 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Warren Pumps (In re Asbestos, 2021)

    …1174 (9th Cir. 2016), "did not reflect a uniquely maritime rule but instead was based on settled common-law principles described in the Restatement." See Stephens v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 935 F.3d 852…