No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

116 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”, page 6 of 6

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 11, 2020 · in the opinion

    Olson v. Brenntag N. Am., Inc. (2020)

    …questions on direct and cross-examination that mischaracterized the witness's own testimony and distorted the testimony of other witnesses. (See NYSCEF No. 819 at 99, citing Pedersen v Union Ry. Co. of N.Y. City…

  2. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 13, 2007 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Stephens (2007)

    …the authors did not measure exposure levels — rather, they undertook a mortality analysis involving 12,873 deceased members of the Operative Plasterers' and Cement Masons' International Association, a union composed of plasterers, cement masons, and shophands…

  3. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 8, 2001 · in the opinion

    Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2001)

    …LA, Attorney for Defendant/Appellant, Commercial Union Insurance Company. Thomas G. Milazzo, James L. Fletcher, Jr., Pamela B. Gautier, LeBlanc, Miranda, Warwick & Milazzo, Metairie, LA, Attorneys for Defendants/Appellants, Asbestos Corporation Limited. Leon Gary, Jr., William…

  4. Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · April 19, 2017 · in the opinion

    Kinseth v. WEIL-McLAIN Company (2017)

    …255 (Iowa 1993). Punitive damages are discretionary and are never awarded as a matter of right. Brokaw v. Winfield-Mt. Union Cmty. Sch. Dist., 788 N.W.2d 386, 395 (Iowa 2010). Within the context of…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 31, 2023 · in the opinion

    Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc. (2023)

    …No. 142 at 8 (Defendant Air & Liquid Systems Corporation recognizing that Yearsley is "a separate defense of derivative immunity"). In a final effort to persuade the Court to disregard Gomez, Defendants list several cases in which…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 3, 2016 · in the opinion

    Davis v. Honeywell International Inc. (2016)

    …v. East Bay Union of Machinists (1964) 227 Cal.App.2d 675, 719 \["Error cannot be predicated on the trial court's refusal to give a requested instruction if the subject matter is substantially covered by…

  7. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 1, 1988 · in the opinion

    H & H Plumbing Co. v. Indus. Comm'n (1988)

    …working foreman. As a nonworking foreman, under union rules, claimant could not handle the materials or tools — he functioned strictly as a supervisor. Claimant acknowledged that, as a union member, he abided by these rules. Consequently…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 28, 2017 · in the opinion

    Sandoval v. American Appliance Manufacturing Corp. (2017)

    …San Juana never visited his workplace or any other AAMC facility. In 2007, the California Secretary of State certified AAMC to be a dissolved corporation. In March 2014, San Juana was diagnosed as suffering from mesothelioma…

  9. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · November 16, 2011 · in the opinion

    Gordon v. Dana Companies (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2011)

    …Moon characterized Gordon's efforts as verbal discussions about the work and testified that union rules would have prevented Gordon from handling the equipment himself.\[21\] The record leaves room for doubt as to whether Gordon…

  10. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 26, 2010 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Bostic (2010)

    …in fact, including the requirement that the defendant's conduct or product be a substantial factor in bringing about the plaintiff's injuries.'" Flores, 232 S.W.3d at 770 (quoting Union Pump Co. v. Allbritton…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 15, 2019 · in the opinion

    Burch v. Certainteed Corporation (2019)

    …they were judicially construed in 1986 to apply to strict product liability cases\].) To the extent ambiguity exists, Proposition 51's ballot materials also aid our construction. (See Amador Valley Joint Union High Sch. Dist. v…

  12. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 26, 1989 · in the opinion

    Bush v. Abex Corp. (1989)

    …to these plants during the years alleged was as follows: "Asbestos Fibre Corp. 1939-1975 "Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. "c/o C.L. Zimmerman Co. "N-303 Cincinnati Union Terminal "Cincinnati, Ohio 45203 "Lake Asbestos of Quebec…

  13. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Coogan v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec Inc. (2020)

    …TEC INC., (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to BORGWARNER CORPORATION); CATERPILLAR GLOBAL MINING, LLC (sued individually and as a successor-in-interest to BUCYRUS INTERNATIONAL f/k/a BUCYRUS-ERIE CO.); CERTAINTEED CORPORATION; DANA…

  14. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · November 2, 2018 · in the opinion

    Estate of Schatz v. John Crane, Inc. (2018)

    …contractors who supervised the workers, and union officials.'" Appellants misconstrue the "feasibility" discussion in Farrar. First, the Court never stated that the feasibility of the warning depended on the ability of the manufacturer to warn an…

  15. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · August 6, 2020 · in the opinion

    Maddy v. Honeywell Internatl., Inc. (2020)

    …to Burkhart, because he was a supervisor, Maddy was barred by union contract from personally performing any of the work, including removing the old linings from the brake shoes or relining the brake shoes, but that…

  16. Medical study · Medical research · 2002

    The International Commission on Occupational Health (ICOH) and its influence on international organizations

    …particularly in regard to asbestos and other fibers and some chemicals and pesticides. Many ICOH members are employees of corporations or consultants to industry, serving multinational corporate interests to influence public health policy in the guise…