No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

199 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 7 of 10

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 30, 2019 · in the opinion

    Dugger v. Union Carbide Corporation (2019)

    …Weathersby Houff. Warren Pumps, Inc., Cross Claimant, represented by Meggie Hogan, Swanson Martin and Bell, pro hac vice. Ford Motor Company, Inc., ThirdParty Plaintiff, represented by Michelle Noorani, Whiteford Taylor and Preston LLP. Alfa Laval, Inc.…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 30, 2019 · in the opinion

    Dugger v. Union Carbide Corporation (2019)

    …Weathersby Houff. Warren Pumps, Inc., Cross Claimant, represented by Meggie Hogan, Swanson Martin and Bell, pro hac vice. Ford Motor Company, Inc., ThirdParty Plaintiff, represented by Michelle Noorani, Whiteford Taylor and Preston LLP. Alfa Laval, Inc.…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 2013 · in the opinion

    Wannall v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2013)

    …verdict against Honeywell International Incorporated and Ford Motor Company for the wrongful death of James D. Lokey, caused by mesothelioma resulting from exposure to asbestos in dust from Bendix brakes installed in Ford and other vehicles."…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 30, 2019 · in the opinion

    Dugger v. Union Carbide Corporation (2019)

    …Weathersby Houff. Warren Pumps, Inc., Cross Claimant, represented by Meggie Hogan, Swanson Martin and Bell, pro hac vice. Ford Motor Company, Inc., ThirdParty Plaintiff, represented by Michelle Noorani, Whiteford Taylor and Preston LLP. Alfa Laval, Inc.…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2017 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. (2017)

    …identified six specific trucks owned by Bekins during the years of Father's employment: two Ford Motor Company (Ford) bobtail trucks (1965 and 1969 models) and four medium-duty International Harvester Company (International) semitruck tractors (1965…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · October 29, 2013 · in the opinion

    Bobo v. Agco Corp. (2013)

    …Inc. ("Consolidated Aluminum"); (v) Dana Companies LLC, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Victor Gasket Manufacturing Company ("Dana"); (vi) Ford Motor Company ("Ford"); (vii) Metropolitan Life Insurance Company ("MetLife"); (viii) TVA; and (ix) Unilever…

  7. Court case · Massachusetts Appeals Court · September 20, 2010 · in the opinion

    Morin v. AutoZone Northeast, Inc. (2010)

    …in the complaint as Pneumo Abex Corporation); Ron's Truck Stop; and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. The judge denied summary judgment as to Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation, and Honeywell International, Inc…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · December 30, 1982 · in the opinion

    Murphree v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. (1982)

    …Supreme Court, with Justice William Fones dissenting, prevented the amendment from becoming effective. The Court held in Ford Motor Company v. Moulton, 511 S.W.2d 690 (Tenn.1974) that under Tennessee vested rights doctrine, based…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · October 28, 2013 · in the opinion

    Bobo v. Agco Corporation (2013)

    …Inc. ("Consolidated Aluminum"); (v) Dana Companies LLC, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Victor Gasket Manufacturing Company ("Dana"); (vi) Ford Motor Company ("Ford"); (vii) Metropolitan Life Insurance Company ("MetLife"); (viii) TVA; and (ix) Unilever…

  10. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 20, 2012 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Fields (2012)

    …Defendants appeal the trial court's ruling only with respect to the following 16 nonparty entities: Georgia Power Company ("Georgia Power"); Ford Motor Company ("Ford"); Genuine Parts Company ("Genuine Parts"); Chrysler LLC ("Chrysler"); General Motors ("GM")…

  11. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · March 5, 2014 · in the opinion

    Hostetter v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)

    …and documents show that for nearly the entire decade of the 1970s, Hostetter worked as a mechanic on trucks manufactured by Mack Trucks, Inc. (Mack) and Ford Motor Company (Ford). Hostetter Dep. at 98-99, 371…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 20, 2017

    Altman v. Ford Motor Co. (In re New York City Asbetos Litigation, 2017)

    …Benicia Pump Repair Benicia 1950s-1980s; helper in boiler and furnace removal and installation stepfather's boiler and furnace business 1950s; worker at a construction products company 1970s; handyman 1970s and 1980s; union carpenter various construction…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · June 9, 2021 · in the opinion

    Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2021)

    …enumerated by company name." (See Dep. Jacqueline Moline, MD, 82:1-19, ECF No. 401-3). Accordingly, the Court cannot find in Dr. Moline's report any discussion of the extent to which Ford products may…

  14. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · November 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Whelan v. Armstrong International Inc. (2019)

    …mentioning. The product manufacturer (1) "has the knowledge and ability to warn of the dangers of the joint use of the products, especially if the other company's product is a \wear item,'" id. at 472…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · April 28, 2022 · in the opinion

    Smeal v. Clark Equipment Company (2022)

    …product caused his harm, from those in which such likelihood is absent on account of only casual or minimal exposure to the defendant's product." Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032 (Pa. 2016) …

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · May 6, 2022 · in the opinion

    Papineau v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2022)

    …core issue in Ford. Because Brake Supply cannot show that Fras-Le purposefully availed itself of Kentucky, however, the Court does not reach this argument. Similarly, Fras-Le contends that haling a foreign company into court…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2021 · in the opinion

    Pizarro v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company (2021)

    …formulated. These inferences cannot be based merely on speculation, but they may be established by circumstantial evidence, in accordance with ordinary standards of proof. Romo v. Ford Motor Co., 99 Cal.App. 4th 1115, 1141 (2002)…

  18. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Coogan v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec Inc. (2020)

    …We agree with the Coogans. a. Legal Principles In Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., the Supreme Court adopted the rule of strict liability for product manufacturers stated in § 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (Am…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 16, 2011 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Salmon Bay and Gravel Co. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2011)

    …Schiff, 602 F.3d 152, 172 (3d Cir. April 7, 2010) (quoting Pineda v. Ford Motor Co., 502 F.3d 237, 243-44 (3d Cir. 2008)). Defendant has not challenged the qualification of Plaintiffs' experts, so…

  20. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    Blakely v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2019)

    …230 (1966). See also Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Co. v. Muething, 65 Ohio St.3d 273, 278-279 (1992); Vidensek v. Ford Motor Co., 9th Dist. Medina No. 2120-M, 1992 WL 393171, [\2] (Dec. 30, 1992)…