292 results for “General Electric”, page 7 of 15
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 27, 2015
BNSF Railway Company v. Superior Court for County OF Los Angeles (2015)
…motion, because California lacked general personal jurisdiction over BNSF; the Kralovetz family lost. Under Goodyear and Daimler, a corporation is subject to general jurisdiction only where its affiliations with the state make it essentially at home…
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · May 15, 2000
Hamilton v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (2000)
…Court reversed the Court of Appeal, holding that Mitchell's second action (for mesothelioma) was not time-barred and that Asbestos Corporation made a general appearance in the first action, so the plaintiffs prevailed on both…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California · August 5, 2021
Darden v. Western Asbestos Settlement Trust (In re Western Asbestos Co., 2021)
…Trust, holding that Edward Darden's 1986 release and claim preclusion barred his June 2017 trust claim. Under California law a third party may enforce a general release if the contracting parties intended to benefit it…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 15, 2019 · in the opinion
Burch v. Certainteed Corporation (2019)
…There, a subcontractor's employee sued a general contractor for injuries caused by the collapse of the general contractor's scaffolding; Cal-OSHA provisions were introduced at trial to establish a duty of care and a…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 1, 2004 · in the opinion
Coalition for Reasonable Regulation OF Naturally Occurring Substances v. California Air Resources Board (2004)
…to serpentine if the physical and chemical conditions are right." Further, "\[t\]he occurrence of asbestos varies with different rock types and geologic conditions. In general, the vast majority of serpentine rock potentially contains asbestos. However…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 2012 · in the opinion
Campbell v. Ford Motor Company (2012)
…or owed only a limited duty, is to be made on a more general basis suitable to the formulation of a legal rule, in most cases preserving for the jury the fact-specific question of whether…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · December 12, 2024 · in the opinion
Dunlavey v. 3M Company (2024)
…2024. United States District Court, C.D. California. CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, District Judge. Proceedings (In Chambers): ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND TO STATE COURT \[49\] Before the Court is a Motion to…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California · November 21, 2016
In re Cfb Liquidating Corporation (2016)
…8.3 of the Plan and Continental had to respond, so the Trustee prevailed. A chapter 11 plan is a contract interpreted under general contract rules (here Illinois law). The plan's term "allocated percentage" has…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2014
Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)
…visited jobsites Home construction jobsites in southern California mid to late 1970's; owner of a home construction business who visited jobsites Home construction jobsites in southern California 1970s; general contractor Construction projects 1960s and 1970s
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 11, 2007 · in the opinion
Cadlo v. Metalclad Insulation Corporation (2007)
…Cadlo's\] contraction of cancer, \[Maxlyn Cadlo\] would have continued her marital relationship with him for another 20 years." (See Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp. (1991) 230 Cal.App.3d 1125, 1152 \[briefs are reliable indications…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2014 · in the opinion
Beckering v. Shell Oil Co. (2014)
…and fibers, the third factor addressing the "\closeness of the connection' "between Ford's conduct (hiring a general contractor) and the injury to a worker's family member off the premises was "attenuated." (Id. at p…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · June 14, 2012 · in the opinion
Couscouris v. Hatch Grinding Wheels, Inc. (2012)
…2012. United States District Court, C.D. California. CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL GEORGE H. KING, District Judge. Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order re: Motion for Remand and for Award of Costs Incurred This matter is before us on…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 8, 2016 · in the opinion
Lepore v. Kelsey-Hayes Co. (2016)
…and pipefitter at numerous jobsites, and was later diagnosed with mesothelioma. The defendant, Perini Corporation, had allegedly been the general contractor at three of those jobsites. (Casey, supra, 206 Cal.App.4th at p. 1225.) Casey…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · May 27, 2020 · in the opinion
Toy v. Honeywell Int'l (In re Toy Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…Court orders otherwise, all case deadlines (other than the trial date, which will be vacated consistent with General Order No. 72-3) remain in effect. IT IS SO ORDERED. \[1\] For purposes of this order, "Defendant…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 2, 2017 · in the opinion
DeLOOF v. Ace Hardware Corp. (2017)
…material fact, such as judicial admissions by respondent. In sum, because there was no factual basis for appellants' general assertion of causation, "\the conclusion is unavoidable that summary judgment was properly granted.'" (Saelzler, supra, 25 Cal…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2003 · in the opinion
Ferris v. Gatke Corporation (2003)
…our opinion concluded, that "the peculiar facts presented by exposure to asbestos fiber from brake pads" made general order 21 "inapplicable to the facts of the claim stated by plaintiffs." Plaintiffs, Wheeler went on to point…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · January 4, 2024 · in the opinion
Corin v. Arkema, Inc. (2024)
…MRW. January 4, 2024. United States District Court, C.D. California. CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL R. GARY KLAUSNER, District Judge. Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order Re: Plaintiff's Motion for Remand \[DE 26\] I. INTRODUCTION On October 31…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 24, 2021 · in the opinion
Sabetian v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc. (2021)
…court issue a remittitur for the dollar equivalent of twice the statutory compensation amount (that is, full statutory compensation for Sabetian's loss of his right testicle, and full compensation for impairment of his general health).
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 13, 2021 · in the opinion
Vanni v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2021)
…Dr. Horn could not give the likelihood of someone in the general population just developing pericardial mesothelioma without exposure to asbestos. He estimates it would be some fraction of the eight. After listening to the testimony…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California · May 21, 2019 · in the opinion
Deere v. Lizarraga (2019)
…represented by Matthew Ross Wilson, Deputy Attorney General. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DEBORAH BARNES, District Judge. Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to…