160 results for “General Electric”, page 7 of 8
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · April 25, 2023 · in the opinion
Lewis v. Washington State Department OF Labor and Industries (2023)
…1516, Counsel for Appellant(s). Robert W. Ferguson, Office of the Attorney General, 1125 Washington St Se, Po Box 40100, Olympia, WA, 98504-0100, Steve Vinyard, Attorney General's Office, Po Box 40121, Olympia, WA, 98504…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · November 23, 2020 · in the opinion
1Up Floors, LLC v. Department of Labor & Industries (2020)
…975 Carpenter Rd Ne Ste 204, Lacey, WA, 98516-5560, Counsel for Appellant(s). Valerie Kay Balch, Office of the Attorney General, 800 Fifth Ave Ste 2000, Seattle, WA, 98104-3188, Seattle Labor & Industries A.g…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · April 28, 1997 · in the opinion
Mavroudis v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. (1997)
…evidence or the supposed inadequacies therein, with the single exception of one general objection based on hearsay contained in the declarations of counsel [\693] provided for use at the reasonableness hearing. Even that objection is not…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · November 30, 2020 · in the opinion
Wineland v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)
…Daubert, 509 U.S. at 594-95. In general, the expert's opinion must be based on principles, techniques, or theories that are generally accepted in his or her profession and must reflect something more than…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · April 27, 1989 · in the opinion
Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp. (1989)
…of Trial Lawyers of America; Richard H. Robblee on behalf of United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices, amici curiae for appellants. [\638] Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, Michael E. Tardif, Senior Assistant, and Michael Madden, Assistant…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · October 16, 2006 · in the opinion
McPhee v. Ford Motor Company (2006)
…s mesothelioma: \[Ms. Leeper\]: Will you be offering any specific opinions at trial regarding the causal relationship between Ms. McPhee's alleged indirect exposure to General Motors or Ford asbestos-containing products and her alleged mesothelioma? . …
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · July 18, 2011 · in the opinion
Yankee v. APV North America, Inc. (2011)
…We hold that the general rule that there is no duty under common law products liability or negligence principles to warn of the dangers of exposure to asbestos in other manufacturers' products applies with regard to…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · October 15, 1987 · in the opinion
Lockwood v. AC & S, Inc. (1987)
…jury. The evidence before the jury included expert testimony on asbestos and the disease of asbestosis, the dangerousness of asbestos to individuals in general and to shipyard workers, and the effects of combining smoking with asbestosis…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 13, 2013 · in the opinion
Lipson v. ON Marine Services Company, LLC (2013)
…court must assess the reasoning or methodology, using as appropriate such criteria as testability, publication in peer reviewed literature, and general acceptance, but the inquiry is a flexible one." Primiano v. Cook, 598 F.3d 558…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · July 3, 2006 · in the opinion
Netversant Wireless Systems v. Dept. OF Labor & Industries (2006)
…and RCW 49.26 must provide the following: (1) Communication of hazards to employees. General industry requirements. .... (c) Duties of employers and building and facility owners. (i) Building and facility owners must determine the presence, location…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 17, 1989 · in the opinion
Falk v. Keene Corporation (1989)
…effects of human exposure to asbestos. Initially, defendant Raymark reserved "the right to direct and ... to use the general information \[from Dr. Demopoulos's testimony\] in closing argument." Once, however, it was apparent that appellants sought…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · November 25, 2002 · in the opinion
Campbell v. Lockheed Shipbuilding Corp. (2002)
…Under section 905(a), a general contractor such as Lockheed will be "deemed" the employer of a subcontractor's employee for the sake of a compensation claim, but "only if the subcontractor fails to secure the…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 3, 2023 · in the opinion
Wright v. 3M Co. (2023)
…jury on "known and obvious" dangers pursuant to § 343A of Restatement (Second) of Torts in light of the evidence presented at trial. ANALYSIS A. General principles regarding premises liability, jury instructions, and the standard of review …
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · September 16, 2024 · in the opinion
Sorrentino v. Ammco Tools, Inc. (2024)
…have "heeded a warning." Id. With this standard in mind, we disagree with VW for three general reasons. First, VW's argument misunderstands how we must view Sorrentino's testimony. Sorrentino testified that he referred to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · January 12, 2022 · in the opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty v. Ulbricht (2022)
…s or early 80's. I don't have a number for it all I can find is it looks like we had a \[General Liability\] policy with U.S.F.&G. I called the Traveler…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 9, 2007 · in the opinion
Herring v. Texaco, Inc. (2007)
…bar date order has preclusive effect, it would call into question the "right to maintain the action," which implicates an exception to the general rule that this court will decline to review arguments abandoned below. Id…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 21, 2021 · in the opinion
United States Fidelity and Guaranty v. Ulbricht (2021)
… 3.5.) Several months later, PM Northwest contacted The Travelers Indemnity Company, an affiliate of USF&G, to inquire about the existence of five (5) commercial general liability policies. (Compl. ¶ 10.) The policies could not be…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · March 3, 2015 · in the opinion
McMann v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2015)
…met if (1) the incident has a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce, and (2) the general character of the activity giving rise to the incident shows a substantial relationship to traditional maritime activity. Sisson v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · November 19, 2012 · in the opinion
Stevens v. CBS Corporation (2012)
…that the "type of incident involved" have "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce," and that "the general character of the activity giving rise to the incident shows a substantial relationship to traditional maritime activity." Id…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · December 14, 2010 · in the opinion
Macias v. Mine Safety Appliances Co. (2010)
…Macias acknowledges that Simonetta and Braaten "did announce a general rule that manufacturers have no duty to warn of dangers of a product that the manufacturer did not make\[,\]" but he argues that "\[t\]he specific…