No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

153 results for “General Electric”, page 7 of 8

  1. Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · June 7, 2011 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Covil Corporation (2011)

    …erred by failing to apply the average weekly wages in conjunction with section 97-38. "\\[I\]n discerning the intent of the General Assembly, statutes in pari materia should be construed together and harmonized whenever possible.'…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 4, 2012 · in the opinion

    Bettencourt v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2012)

    …plaintiffs' injuries. I. Standard of Review A motion for judgment on the pleadings is analogous to a general demurrer. (Ludgate, supra, 82 Cal.App.4th at p. 602.) Like a general demurrer, it tests the sufficiency…

  3. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · July 20, 1992 · in the opinion

    Marinari v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (1992)

    …TAMILIA, KELLY and JOHNSON, JJ. [\442] WIEAND, Judge: The general issue in this asbestos exposure action is whether Pennsylvania, in the context of asbestos actions, shall be a one-disease or two-disease state. More specifically…

  4. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 28, 2012 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corp. v. Synatzske (2012)

    …effect, it cannot be granted thereafter. A like general rule is that if a right to recover depends entirely upon a statute, its repeal deprives the court of jurisdiction over the subject matter. 135 Tex. 95…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · December 6, 2021 · in the opinion

    Settlemyer v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2021)

    …October 14, 2020, Dr. Staggs sets forth the general principles of asbestos-related disease; discusses the studies and reports identifying a causal relationship between asbestos-containing products and diseases such as asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma…

  6. Disease

    Pleural Plaques and Pleural Thickening

    …the medical record of your exposure is already there. How you handle an early claim matters, though: signing a general release, or the date a condition was diagnosed, can affect a later claim and its deadlines…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit · April 13, 1989 · in the opinion

    Kaiser v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1989)

    …late 1985 or early 1986 that he suffered from asbestosis. The Kaisers filed this lawsuit seeking general and special damages for Kaiser's asbestos-related injuries on August 15, 1986. III. All parties accept in their…

  8. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · January 27, 1984 · in the opinion

    Doe v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1984)

    …June 27, 1978 is broad in its scope and is to be liberally construed,\[3\] but is not without its limitations. In its general provision it states: Courts of record, within their respective jurisdictions, shall have…

  9. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · August 7, 1991 · in the opinion

    Money v. Manville Corp. Asbestos Comp. Fund (1991)

    …997 (1987). Just as the General Assembly has recognized that the proximate cause of injuries which are attributable to medical negligence are ordinarily only determinable by expert medical knowledge, this Court has held that expert medical…

  10. Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · August 16, 2005 · in the opinion

    Payne v. Charlotte Heating & Air Cond. (2005)

    …silicosis and other latent occupational diseases and we can conceive of none. As [\363] was true in Walters, the general goals articulated by defendants for the statute are legitimate state interests, but N.C. Gen.Stat…

  11. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 21, 1995 · in the opinion

    Jadlowski v. Owens Corning (1995)

    …decision to admit this evidence rested in the sound discretion of the trial court, and the judge's decision will not be disturbed unless manifestly unjust. Ratner v. General Motors Corp., 241 N.J. Super. 197…

  12. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · April 13, 1982 · in the opinion

    Director, Office OF Workers'comp. v. Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co. (1982)

    …Corp. The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia recently has held that the Director has standing to appeal because of his general administrative responsibility and his financial interest in the special fund…

  13. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 9, 2007 · in the opinion

    Herring v. Texaco, Inc. (2007)

    …bar date order has preclusive effect, it would call into question the "right to maintain the action," which implicates an exception to the general rule that this court will decline to review arguments abandoned below. Id…

  14. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 14, 1994 · in the opinion

    Kieffer and Co., Inc. v. Industrial Com'n (1994)

    …lung condition represented a right chest mesothelioma with possible branchioplexopathy. Dr. Dosh sent decedent to Dr. Curtis Marder for a second opinion about an open pleural biopsy at Marquette General Hospital (MGH). Dr. Marder wanted Dr…

  15. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · November 10, 2004 · in the opinion

    Alexander v. Thiokol Corp. (2004)

    …cancer, while others have differing ailments; thus, the reason for this case. Plaintiffs filed suit for general, specific and punitive damages, as well as medical monitoring. PROCEDURAL FACTS Plaintiffs filed suit on July 9, 1999, alleging…

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · April 11, 2000 · in the opinion

    In re Patenaude (2000)

    …the instant case, where the possibility exists that even individual settlement negotiations will be more efficient if facilitated by a judge who is intimately familiar with the general issues and many of the parties, and where…

  17. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · May 16, 1985 · in the opinion

    Sheppard v. AC & S. Co. (1985)

    …Daum on May 24, 1982. On the other hand, the defendants' position is [\1130] that the cause of action is time-barred due to presence of general symptoms, namely, shortness of breath, as early as 1974…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion

    Quarles v. Advocate Mines Limited (2006)

    …specialist in occupational medicine called by Quarles, testified not about any specific facts of this case, but about the evolving general state of knowledge in medicine, science and industry, and about the dangers of asbestos in…

  19. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · July 21, 2010 · in the opinion

    Summers v. Certainteed Corp. (2010)

    …breath. In so finding, Dr. Gelfand noted that, while the obstructive lung condition due to smoking showed "some improvement," in general, the reduction in lung diffusion remained severe. See Report of Dr. Gelfand concerning Frederick Summers…

  20. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 11, 1998 · in the opinion

    McCauley v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    …wages. \[4\] In Simmons, the supreme court noted a limited exception to the general rule that a plaintiff does not have a viable cause of action for asymptomatic pleural thickening. This exception recognizes that a plaintiff…