No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

134 results for “General Electric”, page 7 of 7

  1. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 22, 2011 · in the opinion

    Bozeman v. Union Carbide Corporation (2011)

    …Lovell factors as to this case, we see no reason to depart from the general rule that judicial decisions are to be applied retroactively unless otherwise specified in the decision. The principle of law considered in…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 2, 2022 · in the opinion

    Adams v. Eagle, Inc. (2022)

    …in which, for example, one circuit held "\[w\]hen only minimal or very general requirements are set for the contractor by the United States the \[government contractor defense\] is inapplicable." \[127\] Accordingly, under Boyle, in this…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 4, 2024 · in the opinion

    Sentilles v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2024)

    …2) whether the theory has been subjected to peer review and publication; (3) the known or potential rate of error; and (4) the general acceptance of the methodology in the scientific community. Id. at 593-95…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas · March 14, 2008 · in the opinion

    Kozak v. Guard-Line, Inc. (2008)

    …time of removal\[.\]" Id. at 264 (emphasis added). This court has adhered to the general rule that "some subsequent developments in a case do not affect a court's prior-existing jurisdiction." Garcia v. Boyar & Miller…

  5. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 11, 2001 · in the opinion

    Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2001)

    …that economic theories which attempt to extrapolate the "value" of human life from various studies of wages, costs, etc., have no place in the calculation of general damages. See also Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc…

  6. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 24, 2014 · in the opinion

    Baruch v. Baxter Healthcare Corp. (2014)

    …testimony is incredible as a matter of law. In support it submits an affidavit by Jason Maxwell\[2\], Vice President and Associate General Counsel for Cardinal Health, Inc., a corporate entity with a successor relationship to…

  7. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 9, 2008 · in the opinion

    Spillman v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2008)

    …Roggli testified that an examination of a lung tissue sample from Mr. Spillman confirmed that he was exposed to asbestos at a rate much higher than that of the general background population. \[3\] La. C.C…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · December 15, 1988 · in the opinion

    Whatley v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1988)

    …474 (5th Cir.1985); see Shipp v. General Motors Corp., 750 F.2d 418, 425 (5th Cir.1985) (Duncan placed the allocative burden of comparative causation on the defendant). Sufficiency of the Evidence Whatley contends that…

  9. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013 · in the opinion

    Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Minton (2013)

    …Scindia, 451 U.S. at 167. Exxon argues that there was no active involvement because its supervision did not extend beyond general oversight. Using the language of the court in Dow v. Oldendorff Carriers GMBH & Co.…

  10. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 29, 2013 · in the opinion

    Walston v. Boeing Company (2013)

    …individuals will develop \[m\]esothelioma" or other asbestos related diseases. CP at 2855. Mesothelioma is extremely rare in the general population, including exposed workers. But among certain groups of workers with the highest cumulative asbestos exposure…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 23, 2014 · in the opinion

    Humphries v. OneBEACON America Insurance Company (2014)

    …1969)). "That nexus is established by the federal officer's direct and detailed control over the defendant. If a corporation only establishes that the acts occurred under the general auspices of federal direction, however, then it…

  12. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 19, 2018 · in the opinion

    Vitale v. Burnham, LLC (2018)

    …App. 438, 451 (2010) (citations and quotations omitted). "Mere general allegations of conclusory assertions will not suffice." Id. (citations omitted). Additionally, "a mere scintilla of evidence in support of the non-moving party's claim is…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 10, 2018 · in the opinion

    Chevron Oronite Company LLC v. Jacobs Field Services North America, Inc. (2018)

    …Aug. 10, 2017): As a general rule, an indemnitee such as Oronite must establish actual liability and the reasonableness of its settlement to recover from the indemnitor. But an indemnitee need only establish potential liability in…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 17, 2009 · in the opinion

    Breedlove v. CSX Transp. Corp. (2009)

    …based duties have become a "semantic morass." Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 358 U.S. 625, 79 S.Ct. 406, 3 L.Ed.2d 550 (1959) (citing Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 245 F.2d 175…