138 results for “General Electric”, page 7 of 7
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · March 28, 2019 · in the opinion
Brown v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…and Allis-Chalmers, Con Ed's general contractor. The jury found that Brown had been exposed to asbestos at [\613] Ravenswood, that Con Ed had exercised supervision and control over workers at the powerhouse and had…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 19, 2017 · in the opinion
Aquitato v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · July 3, 2014 · in the opinion
Harris v. Ajax Boiler, Inc. (2014)
…the overhaul of any of the defendants' boilers. Plaintiff has no evidence to show that defendants' boilers required the use of an asbestos-containing cement, in general, or Narcolite in particular, to affect a proper repair…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 27, 2017 · in the opinion
Hiett v. Ac&r Insulation Co., Inc. (2017)
…R's warning and "taken steps to have the clothes washed at a commercial laundry services." This argument fails both as a general matter and under the facts specific to this case. First, the general matter…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2020 · in the opinion
Kramer v. Amcord Inc. (2020)
…testified that gem and diamond cutter was an alternative title under the general "stonecutter" category and, further, that a vocational rehabilitation expert had confirmed that the general "stonecutter" category was in fact the correct one for…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · May 22, 2006 · in the opinion
Creech v. Agco Corporation (2006)
…Corporation when it bought the Kewanee boiler division assets from American Standard. The general rule in Washington is that a corporation purchasing the assets of another corporation does not, by reason of the purchase of assets…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 11, 2001 · in the opinion
Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2001)
…that economic theories which attempt to extrapolate the "value" of human life from various studies of wages, costs, etc., have no place in the calculation of general damages. See also Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 26, 2019 · in the opinion
Harris v. Triple A Machine Shop, Inc. (2019)
…room or in boilers may have contained asbestos, and even accepting that it was Triple A's general practice to remove such materials in ways generating respirable dust and fibers, Plaintiffs' discovery responses are devoid of…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2002 · in the opinion
McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc. (2002)
…summary judgment was reversed on appeal. In Scheiding, a general contractor defendant supported its summary judgment motion with a declaration from counsel stating that the plaintiff did not mention the defendant in discovery. (Id. at p…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 1, 2010 · in the opinion
Crane v. Linkus (2010)
…appellee's motion and entered judgment in the amount requested. Appellant noted an appeal to this Court. General Background Before addressing the causation issue in this case, it may be helpful to place it into context…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · December 15, 1988 · in the opinion
Whatley v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1988)
…474 (5th Cir.1985); see Shipp v. General Motors Corp., 750 F.2d 418, 425 (5th Cir.1985) (Duncan placed the allocative burden of comparative causation on the defendant). Sufficiency of the Evidence Whatley contends that…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 10, 2018 · in the opinion
Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2018)
…support a jury conclusion that W&G was the primary insulation contractor working at LRHS. This is not a case in which evidence was presented showing the general presence of asbestos-containing products at LRHS. Accordingly…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 18, 2018 · in the opinion
Vanhoy v. American International Industries (2018)
…to understate the hazards of asbestos exposure, all for their own profit and gain, Defendant \[Metropolitan Life Insurance Company\] willfully, wantonly, and with malice in calculated disregard for the welfare of the general public. . . . (Am. Compl…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Collin v. Calportland Company (2014)
…Corp. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 1222, 1231 (Casey).) In Casey, the plaintiff accused the defendant, a general contractor, of exposing him to asbestos at jobsites where the plaintiff worked for a subcontractor. (Id. at p…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 12, 1990 · in the opinion
King v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1990)
…the Raybestos-Manhattan Corporation from 1929 to 1953. The "Sumner Simpson papers" consist of correspondence between Simpson and the general counsel for Johns-Manville during the years 1935-1939. The papers tend to show awareness of…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 19, 2018 · in the opinion
Vitale v. Burnham, LLC (2018)
…App. 438, 451 (2010) (citations and quotations omitted). "Mere general allegations of conclusory assertions will not suffice." Id. (citations omitted). Additionally, "a mere scintilla of evidence in support of the non-moving party's claim is…
-
Court case · Montana Workers' Comp. Court · July 1, 2009 · in the opinion
Johnson v. Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation (2009)
…a dryer tender and 6695 hours as a dryer stacker.\[19\] The dryer tender was responsible for the general day-to-day operation of the dryers.\[20\] The dryer stacker was responsible for operating the grading…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · October 16, 2007 · in the opinion
Hicks v. Biltrite (2007)
…1126 (R.I. 2001) (citations omitted); Volino v. General Dynamics, 539 A.2d 531, 532-533 (R.I 1988). The moving party bears the initial burden of establishing that no genuine issues of material fact exist…