228 results for “General Electric”, page 7 of 12
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 18, 2019
Babcock v. Watts Water Technologies (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…a Delaware company based in Massachusetts and did not exist before 1985. The court found it had preserved the defense in its answer but held there was no general jurisdiction in New York. On specific jurisdiction…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Georgia · December 27, 2013
Cabasug v. Crane Company (2013)
…law, the court found no evidence that Emhart's distillers contained asbestos components or that Emhart supplied asbestos replacement parts, and the expert's statements were too general. The Griscom-Russell company dissolved in 1962, before…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · January 31, 2024
Pelton v. John Crane, Inc. (2024)
…may seek punitive damages. Under maritime law, a plaintiff may show substantial-factor causation through admissible general expert testimony plus circumstantial evidence of substantial exposure over a substantial period, without expert testimony specific to the defendant…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 13, 2019
Johansen v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
…law, a plaintiff must show exposure to each defendant's product and that the product was a substantial factor in causing the injury. A general recollection of a manufacturer's name, with no detail on where…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 7, 2022 · in the opinion
Adams v. Eagle, Inc. (2022)
"General causation is whether a substance is capable of causing a particular injury or condition in the general population, while specific causation is whether a substance caused a particular individual's injury."\[61\] Because of the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · November 5, 1997 · in the opinion
Ciletti v. Raymark Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 1997)
In general, filing a proof of claim would not appear to constitute settlement under § 15-108. The plaintiff's proffer of a release to the defendant has been called "the defining moment of settlement", In re…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 16, 2020 · in the opinion
Clevenger v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)
Marchevsky's answered: So basically as we put in the guidelines, in general, it's difficult to tell a sarcoma mesothelioma from other tumors, which is why we went through the trouble of putting together the…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 15, 2023
Stauder v. Shell Oil Company (2023)
…interest running from the original 2016 petition, rejecting Union Carbide's challenges. An appellate court may disturb a general damages award only after finding the jury abused its vast discretion, and prior awards are compared only…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 19, 2018
Hubbard v. California Water Service Company (2018)
…the party asserting the exception to a hirer's general non-liability for a contractor's employees bears the burden of proving that the contractor neither knew nor could reasonably be expected to know of the…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · November 28, 1988 · in the opinion
Menne v. Celotex Corp. (1988)
…113 (3d Cir.1985) (evidence of general use of Pittsburgh Corning's Unibestos at job site was sufficient to allow jury to find Pittsburgh Corning to be a factor in causing the plaintiff's injury). \[13…
-
Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · June 23, 1997 · in the opinion
Metro-North Commuter R. Co. v. Buckley (1997)
…harms suffered by a sympathetic individual plaintiff, so they must consider the general impact, on workers as well as employers, of the general liability rules they would thereby create. Here the relevant question concerns not simply…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · December 12, 2024 · in the opinion
Dunlavey v. 3M Company (2024)
…2024. United States District Court, C.D. California. CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, District Judge. Proceedings (In Chambers): ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND TO STATE COURT \[49\] Before the Court is a Motion to…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · October 18, 2001
Jurich v. Garlock, Inc. (2001)
…not sellers of asbestos-containing products. The general ten-year repose period violates the open courts clause of Article I, Section 12 as applied to a latent asbestos disease where exposure began before the Act or…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 6, 2020 · in the opinion
Lopez v. McDERMOTT, Inc (2020)
…inherent in the job. R. Doc. 449-2 at 19. In general, a premises owner has a duty to protect persons on the premises from the unreasonable risk of harm. Mundy v. Dep't of Health…
-
Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · April 16, 2009 · in the opinion
Nolan v. Weil-McLain (2009)
…determining whether a plaintiff has satisfied the burden of proof at trial. We began by reciting the "general rule in civil cases" that a plaintiff bears the burden of producing evidence sufficient to establish each element…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 28, 2017 · in the opinion
American Home Assur. Co. v. Port Auth. of NY & NJ (2017)
…American Home Assurance Company (American Home) seeks declaratory relief to determine its rights and obligations under a general liability insurance policy issued to defendant The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (the Port Authority…
-
Court case · Florida Supreme Court · March 17, 1988 · in the opinion
Celotex Corp. v. Meehan (1988)
…allow an expansion of a statute of limitations period when the change is made before the cause of action is barred by the prior statutory limitation period. Corbett v. General Engineering & Machinery Co., 160 Fla. 879…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 3, 2024 · in the opinion
Monlux v. 3M Company (2024)
…1-2, 1-3. Both versions of the complaint contain only general allegations against Foster Wheeler without identifying what specific product allegedly injured Mr. Monlux at Lockheed Shipyard. Foster Wheeler notes that both versions of the…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 27, 2019 · in the opinion
Schildknegt v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp. (2019)
…App.4th 246, 251-254 \[affirming summary judgment in favor of general contractor on ground plaintiff lacked evidence he was present when the general contractor's employees performed insulation work likely to release asbestos dust\]; Casey…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 6, 2013 · in the opinion
Klinger v. Alderete (2013)
…p. 34.) Although the defendant in Campbell was a property owner, not a general contractor employer, at least some of the reasoning expressed in Campbell for finding no liability would potentially apply to the underlying lawsuit…