No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

286 results for “General Electric”, page 7 of 15

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 25, 2021

    Nelson v. 3M Co. (2021)

    …of personal jurisdiction, dismissing the complaint against it and continuing the action against the remaining defendants. A New York court lacks general jurisdiction over a corporation not incorporated or headquartered in New York, and specific jurisdiction…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 19, 2019

    Marzigliano v. American Biltrite (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …Marzigliano plaintiffs' complaint and all cross-claims, finding fact issues on general and specific causation. A defendant cannot win summary judgment by pointing to gaps in plaintiff's proof; it must make a prima facie showing…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 27, 2019

    Linsky v. Mannington Mills (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …Linsky's complaint and all cross-claims, finding issues of fact on general and specific causation. A defendant cannot win summary judgment by pointing to gaps in plaintiff's proof; it must make a prima facie…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 31, 2019

    Carlstrand v. Mannington Mills (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …win summary judgment by pointing to gaps in the plaintiff's proof, and conflicting expert opinions on general and specific causation raise credibility issues of fact that cannot be resolved on motion papers. Causation; Product Identification…

  5. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · January 10, 1985

    White v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1985)

    …barred. The court answered yes. Washington's statutes do not say when a claim accrues, so the general discovery rule applies. A survivor takes the decedent's rights, including the benefit of the discovery rule. Whether…

  6. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 15, 2015

    North v. Adam Opel AG. (2015)

    …there was no general jurisdiction, and argued that New York's long-arm statute gave specific jurisdiction and that more discovery was needed. The court held that the plaintiffs' submissions, which included a General Motors annual…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 31, 2020

    Marsh v. Huntington Ingalls, Incorporated (2020)

    …and ports who alleges the defendant supplied asbestos products to those sites has shown prima facie personal jurisdiction and stated a plausible products liability claim under general maritime law (Restatement (Second) of Torts 402A). Design Defect…

  8. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 14, 2001

    Hoffman v. AC&S, Inc. (2001)

    …site at some unspecified time during the 1960s is insufficient. An expert's general opinion that workers were exposed to asbestos products does not supply the missing link to a particular defendant. Product Identification; Expert Testimony…

  9. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 19, 2020

    Luca v. American Int'l Indus. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …in an asbestos case by pointing to gaps in the plaintiff's proof, and conflicting expert reports on general and specific causation raise credibility issues that a court cannot resolve on motion papers. Causation; Expert Testimony…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · August 10, 2018

    Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec LLC (2018)

    …a pathologist's tissue analysis, an occupational physician's exposure opinions, a scientist's general testimony on how asbestos causes disease, a historian's account of what was known about asbestos hazards, and studies and videos…

  11. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · August 23, 2018

    Waite v. Aii Acquisition Corp. (2018)

    …tort, and a corporation is not at home in a state, or deemed to consent to general jurisdiction, merely by substantial business there or by registering and appointing a service agent under Florida law. Personal Jurisdiction…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 17, 2020

    Peterson v. Vanderbilt Mineral (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …them earlier was inadvertent and the other side shows no prejudice. Conflicting expert reports on general and specific causation raise fact issues that bar summary judgment, and a venue change motion served long after the answer…

  13. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 26, 2019

    Gayoso v. Nissan North America (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …assert it with specificity in its answer, and general denials do not preserve it. Where the parties' experts rely on conflicting studies, issues of fact on general and specific causation preclude summary judgment. Causation; Expert Testimony…

  14. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 27, 2020

    Luca v. Whittaker, Clark and Daniels (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …s proof; it must show its product could not have contributed to the illness. Conflicting expert reports on general and specific causation raise fact issues that cannot be resolved on motion papers. Causation; Product Identification; Expert…

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 22, 2019

    Olson v. Imerys Talc America (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …talcum powder, because the claim has an articulable nexus to that business. General jurisdiction was lacking because the defendants are not incorporated or headquartered in New York. Personal Jurisdiction consumer user of talcum powder 1953-2015

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · May 27, 2016

    Thurmon v. Georgia Pacific, LLC (2016)

    …the injury. Exposure to third-party asbestos gaskets used on the defendant's valves was not enough, and the court did not need to adopt a general 'bare metal defense'. Product Identification; Failure to Warn; Design…

  17. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 18, 2019

    Babcock v. Watts Water Technologies (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …a Delaware company based in Massachusetts and did not exist before 1985. The court found it had preserved the defense in its answer but held there was no general jurisdiction in New York. On specific jurisdiction…

  18. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 22, 2016

    Feinberg v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2016)

    … plaintiffs had not excluded other possible causes; its talc was asbestos-free; and there was no proof of general or specific causation. The court denied the motion. Whether her earlier chest pain and pleural effusions were…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 1, 2023

    Haeck v. 3M Company (2023)

    …removal. The court agreed. Under Ninth Circuit precedent (Self v. General Motors), a case becomes removable only through a voluntary act by the plaintiff. Because the summary judgment for Allied Fluid was involuntary from Plaintiffs' perspective…

  20. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 20, 2012

    Bischofsberger v. AO Smith Water Products (2012)

    …time of exposure, disease, discovery status and counsel. It found that the cases shared only general testimony on asbestos science, state of the art and the nature of mesothelioma. They had different exposure periods, different types…