No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

185 results for “General Electric”, page 7 of 10

  1. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · March 2, 2021 · in the opinion

    Neely EX rel. Estate OF Goehring v. Union Carbide Corporation (2021)

    …manufactured, or marketed by Union Carbide were a substantial factor in causing Janet's mesothelioma. Union Carbide does not raise a general causation challenge. As the parties acknowledge, the proper framework for analysis of specific causation…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 17, 2023 · in the opinion

    Crossland v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2023)

    …s expert witness, Dr. Staggs.\[19\] Both experts testify to general and specific causation. Woodward contends that both experts' specific causation opinions are unreliable because they are premised on unreliable facts.\[20\] Second, Woodward moves for…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 18, 2019 · in the opinion

    Germain v. American Int'l Indus. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …of this Order with Notice of Entry pursuant to NYSCEF e-filing protocol on the remaining parties, the General Clerk's Office and the County Clerk's Office, who are directed to mark their records accordingly…

  4. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · September 23, 2004 · in the opinion

    In re Sears, Roebuck and Co. (2004)

    …they are entitled to discovery of all of Sears' asbestos-related products because the issue is Sears' knowledge of the danger of asbestos in general to show "what Sears knew and when it knew it." However…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 11, 2019 · in the opinion

    Parfait v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2019)

    …Co., 149 F.3d 387, 397 (5th Cir. 1998). Another feature distinguishing the federal officer removal statute from the general removal statute is that, unlike § 1441(a),\[6\] § 1442(a) must be liberally construed. See Watson…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 30, 2019 · in the opinion

    Lopez v. the Hillshire Brands Company (2019)

    …430, the more general instruction on substantial-factor causation: "A substantial factor in causing harm is a factor that a reasonable person would consider to have contributed to the harm. It must be more than a…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 14, 2007 · in the opinion

    Rosen v. Regents of University of California (2007)

    …and premises liability. They sought both general and punitive damages.\[6\] A first amended complaint was filed in May 2002, adding causes of action against the Regents for making false representations and for loss of consortium…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Nevada · February 23, 2005 · in the opinion

    Knutson v. Allis-Chalmers Corp. (2005)

    …1998). The doctrine serves as an exception to the general rule that a court must rely solely on the face of the complaint to determine if complete diversity between the plaintiffs and defendants is present. Id…

  9. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · May 12, 2017 · in the opinion

    Stockton v. Ford Motor Company (2017)

    …908, 911 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1993) (quoting Higgs v. General Motors Corp., 655 F. Supp. 22, 23 (E.D.Tenn.1985)) ("\\[I\]t makes no difference whether the complaint is couched in terms of negligence, strict…

  10. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · April 19, 2007 · in the opinion

    Satterfield v. Breeding Insulation Company, Inc. (2007)

    …"Thus, the imposition of a legal duty reflects society's contemporary policies and social requirements concerning the right of individuals and the general public to be protected from another's act or conduct." Bradshaw, 854 S…

  11. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 14, 1997 · in the opinion

    Van Winkle v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997)

    …the general rule is that the trial court has a duty to provide instruction to the jury where it has posed an explicit question or requested clarification on a point of law arising from facts about…

  12. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 11, 2011 · in the opinion

    Arnold v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2011)

    …BOILER COMPANY, a division of AMERICAN RADIATOR & STANDARD SANITARY COMPANY; TRICO CONTRACTING, INC., TRANSALTA CENTRALIA GENERATION, LLC; UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION; GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CO.; WRIGHT SCHUCHART HARBOR CO., WEYERHAUSER COMPANY; ZURN INDUSTRIES LLC; GOULDS PUMPS (IPG), INC.;…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 26, 2023 · in the opinion

    Perkins v. United States (2023)

    …engaged in the "ripout" or "tearout" of asbestos. The government fails to cite any authority for this proposition. It points to general studies, but does not demonstrate that Mr. Perkins did not "ripout" or "tearout" asbestos…

  14. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · June 4, 2009 · in the opinion

    Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2009)

    …102 S.Ct. 2579, 73 L.Ed.2d 202 (1982)). \[12\] The express reservation test is similar to the rule of general retroactivity discussed by this court in pre-Robinson decisions. Haines, 87 Wash.2d at…

  15. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · April 26, 2022 · in the opinion

    Nemeth v. Brenntag N. Am. (2022)

    …plaintiff's evidence (see majority op at 344-347). To the extent the majority suggests there was a lack of any evidence of general causation, such a suggestion is unsupportable as there was an abundance of…

  16. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 19, 2014 · in the opinion

    Vantosh v. 3M Co. (2014)

    …fact that it was silicone, had some properties, dangerous properties. Q. So this is general information you received at the end of your career that silicone, in general, may have contained asbestos. Is that correct? A…

  17. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 27, 2007 · in the opinion

    Alcoa, Inc. v. Behringer (2007)

    …Nevertheless, appellees argue that this memorandum evidences Alcoa's general knowledge that "contaminants could be taken home." Knowledge of the general danger of contact-poisoning from "chemical products," however, does not amount to knowledge of the…

  18. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 11, 2007 · in the opinion

    Alcoa, Inc. v. Behringer (2007)

    …Nevertheless, appellees argue that this memorandum evidences Alcoa's general knowledge that "contaminants could be taken home." Knowledge of the general danger of contact-poisoning from "chemical products," however, does not amount to knowledge of the…

  19. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · March 31, 2016 · in the opinion

    Wells v. 3M Co. (2016)

    …plaintiff must be considered to have discovered such an injury when he or she is actually diagnosed as suffering from a particular disease, even though unaware of its cause" (Sweeney v General Print., 210 AD2d 865…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 23, 2023 · in the opinion

    Ramirez v. Avon Prods. (Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2023)

    …§ 2025.620, italics added.) While discovery in general aids both plaintiffs and defendants equally, the tools of discovery are intended to benefit the party utilizing those tools. The purpose of a deposition is not to aid…