202 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 7 of 11
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 27, 2009 · in the opinion
Mahoney v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2009)
…the reasons set forth below. A. Causation GP contends that plaintiffs failed to introduce evidence sufficient to satisfy the "substantial factor" standard of causation set forth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 22, 2020 · in the opinion
Gibbons v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer (Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2020)
…was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 10, 2006 · in the opinion
Boyle v. Certainteed Corporation (2006)
…and then filed this appeal. II. DISCUSSION A. Introduction There are several sources of authority for local judicial rulemaking. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 966-967.) Those sources of authority include…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 5, 2021 · in the opinion
Leavitt v. Johnson & Johnson (2021)
…prejudicial error and affirm. BACKGROUND A. A plaintiff seeking to hold a manufacturer liable for asbestos-related latent injuries must satisfy a two-part causation test. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 6, 2013 · in the opinion
Klinger v. Alderete (2013)
…Unocal Corp. (2005) 37 Cal.4th 659, 682; Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 962.) Given these facts and the legal authority at the time, we find that Klinger did not establish…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · October 1, 2021 · in the opinion
Dietrich v. Boeing Company (2021)
…successor in interest to Mason-Neilan Regulator Company and Annin Valve Co.; METALCLAD INSULATION LLC, FKA Metalclad Insulation Corporation; OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., individually and as successor in interest to Owens-Illinois Glass Company; SOCO WEST, INC.…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 15, 2016 · in the opinion
DePREE v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2016)
…the defendant's asbestos products was, in reasonable medical probability, a substantial factor in causing or contributing to \[the\] risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 957-958 (Rutherford)…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 15, 2013 · in the opinion
Lee v. Clark Reliance Corporation (2013)
…346; Taylor, supra, 171 Cal.App.4th at p. 585.) On appeal, plaintiff cites Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, and Lineaweaver v. Plant Insulation Co. (1995) 31 Cal.App.4th 1409…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 1996 · in the opinion
Armstrong World Industries v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. (1996)
…the trial court's method of apportionment is not challenged on appeal, we find no error in the decision to hold each policy responsible in full subject to such apportionment.\[17\] (See also Owens-Illinois, Inc…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 23, 2018 · in the opinion
Rudolph v. Rudolph and Sletten, Inc. (2018)
…Act, nor their extensive discussion of apportionment— establishes Allen's childhood exposure to asbestos exempts the amended complaint from the exclusivity doctrine. Melendrez does not contravene Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 21, 2021 · in the opinion
Benavidez v. Fluor Corp. (2021)
…a particular exposure or series of exposures was a \legal cause' of his injury, i.e., a substantial factor in bringing about the injury." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 982-983…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 26, 2021 · in the opinion
Toy v. Honeywell Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)
…ago. See, e.g., Brodkin Report at 64. Defendant first cites to the California Supreme Court's opinion in Rutherford v. Owens Illinois, Inc., regarding the proof of causation required in asbestos-related cases. 16 Cal…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 4, 2008 · in the opinion
Holliday v. Warren Pumps LLC (2008)
…to a reasonable medical probability a substantial factor in contributing to any asbestos-related disease suffered by him, pursuant to the standard of proof articulated in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · February 12, 2013 · in the opinion
Nelson v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp. (2013)
…Gypsum Co., 98 Cal. App.4th 1098, 1103, 120 Cal.Rptr.2d 23 (2002) (citations omitted) (citing Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953, 975-76, 67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16, 941 P.2d…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 28, 2019 · in the opinion
Berg v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2019)
…on "a cause of action for asbestos-related latent injuries, the plaintiff must first establish some threshold exposure to the defendant's defective asbestos-containing products." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 21, 2014 · in the opinion
Paulus v. Crane Co. (2014)
…the defendant's asbestos products was, in reasonable medical probability, a substantial factor in causing or contributing to his risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 957-958 \[67…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 8, 2016 · in the opinion
Lepore v. Kelsey-Hayes Co. (2016)
…McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. (2002) 98 Cal.App.4th 1098, 1103 (McGonnell); see Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 976-977.) Direct evidence of exposure is not required; rather, the plaintiff…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 31, 2023 · in the opinion
Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc. (2023)
…CV-00325-HSG, 2021 WL 1167638, at [\5] (N.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2021) (quoting Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal. 4th 953, 958, 67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16, 941 P.2d 1203 (Cal. 1997)…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2013 · in the opinion
Scott v. Lennar Corporation (2013)
…plaintiff's injury. \[Citations.\]' \[Citation.\]" (Whiteley v. Philip Morris, Inc. (2004) 117 Cal.App.4th 635, 696 (Whiteley).) In Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 982-983, fn. omitted (Rutherford), our Supreme…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · May 20, 2021 · in the opinion
Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Toy Asbestos, 2021)
…exposed to asbestos from Defendant's products; and (2) this exposure was a substantial factor in causing Mr. Toy's injury and death. See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal. 4th 953, 968-69 (Cal…