139 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 7 of 7
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · July 18, 2007
Bugosh v. Allen Refractories Company (2007)
…and sewer pipe in Pittsburgh. He later worked at the Anchor Hocking glass plant, where he was exposed to asbestos cement used to repair glass-annealing ovens (lehrs), to pipe covering, and to transite mill board…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · April 7, 2011
Wagers v. Sgl Carbon, LLC (2011)
…a premises owner owes an independent contractor's employees a general duty to warn of hidden dangers, but no breach occurs where the contractor already knew the danger. The owner also owes a nondelegable duty for…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · January 4, 2023
Shellenberger v. Kreider Farms (2023)
…Superior Court reversed the trial court's grant of summary judgment for Kreider Farms (the employers) and remanded for further proceedings, in favor of the Shellenberger estate. An employer owes an employee, as a business invitee…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · February 15, 2022
Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2022)
…as employer of an independent contractor. Under Pennsylvania law, a landowner owes no duty to an independent contractor's employee for a danger the contractor knows of, and the retained-control and peculiar-risk exceptions did…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 17, 2005 · in the opinion
Rudy v. A-Best Products Company (2005)
…The question of whether a landowner owes a duty to warn an independent contractor of dangerous conditions on the premises turns on whether the owner possesses "superior knowledge" or information which places him in a better…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · June 20, 2002
Gutteridge v. AP Green Services, Inc. (2002)
…used, and credibility cannot be decided at that stage. A landowner that has superior knowledge of a hazard owes a duty to warn an independent contractor's employees, even if it is out of possession. Causation…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · February 16, 2022 · in the opinion
Gay v. AO Smith Corp. (2022)
…911 A.2d at 1273 (citing § 414 and explaining that an employer owes a duty to an independent contractor's employees if he or she "exercise\[s\]... control over the means and methods of the contractor…
-
Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · February 29, 2012 · in the opinion
Kurns v. Railroad Friction Products Corp. (2012)
…Courtney C.T. Horrigan, David J. Bird, Robert H. Owen, Reed Smith LLP, Pittsburgh, PA, for Railroad Friction Products Corp. [\1262] Syllabus\[\\] George Corson worked as a welder and machinist for a railroad carrier. After retirement…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · April 15, 2015 · in the opinion
Stellar v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2015)
…585 Pa. 335, 888 A.2d 740, 746 (2005). Whether a defendant owes a duty of care to a plaintiff is a question of law in Pennsylvania. Kleinknecht v. Gettysburg Coll., 989 F.2d 1360, 1366…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 15, 2007 · in the opinion
Bugosh v. Allen Refractories Co. (2007)
…construction materials. Surface Combustion, Inc. provided glass ovens, termed lehrs at Anchor Hocking Glass Company. \[2\] Two other defendants listed on the verdict sheet settled, and are not involved in these appeals. \[3\] Mesothelioma, a cancer…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 31, 1982 · in the opinion
Neal v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd. (1982)
…Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. Day, Alaska, 594 P.2d 38, 47 (1979); Owen, Punitive Damages in Products Liability Litigation, 74 Mich.L.Rev. 1257, 1277-1299 (1976). See also State ex. rel. Young v. Crookham…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · October 8, 2024 · in the opinion
The Continental Insurance Company v. Pennsylvania Electric Company (2024)
…owes a duty to defend Penelec for the underlying action. See Penelec's Answer, New Matter, and Counterclaim at 23 ¶ 41 (unpaginated). In Count II, Penelec asserted a claim for a declaratory judgment that Continental owes…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 25, 2009 · in the opinion
In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (2009)
…decision, but was denied. However, Circuit Judge Owen wrote a dissent emphasizing the distinction in 28 U.S.C. § 1407 and suggesting that if Congress had wished for the statute to cover document production subpoenas, it…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · July 16, 2019 · in the opinion
Shook v. Avon Products, Inc. (2019)
…litigation. See J&J Memorandum in Support of Motion to Fix Venue, ECF No. 1-5 at 17 ("Debtors claim that J&J owes them a duty to defend." (citing 1989 Agreement § 11 & 2011 Agreement ¶ 6))…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 12, 2010 · in the opinion
McGUFFIE v. Mead Corp. (2010)
…even one that owns all the stock of a subsidiary corporation\[,\] is not subject to liability for the acts of its subsidiary unless the parent so controls the operation of the subsidiary as to make it…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 1, 2012 · in the opinion
Conner v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2012)
…now holds that, under maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute.
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · January 26, 2017 · in the opinion
National Fire Insurance Company OF Hartford v. Burns & Scalo Roofing Company (2017)
…on an analysis of facts and/or evidence. As detailed below, whether an insurer owes a duty to defend an insured, in a litigation brought against the insured, is an issue generally determined by considering the…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · May 27, 1993 · in the opinion
JH France Refractories v. Allstate (1993)
…than one insurer will be triggered. Because each insurer is fully liable, and because Keene cannot collect more than it owes in damages, the issue of dividing insurance obligations arises. The only logical resolution of this…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · February 20, 2019 · in the opinion
Gorton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
…registered as a foreign corporation in the state. (Id. ¶18.) Ford owns property in Pennsylvania, first registered to do business in Pennsylvania in 1920, and is currently registered as a foreign corporation in the state. (Id…