No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

149 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 7 of 8

  1. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · May 16, 2018 · in the opinion

    Whelan v. Armstrong International Inc. (2018)

    …Co. and Daniel P. Creed Co. Inc.; NMBFIL INC., f/k/a Bondo Corp.; OWENS-ILLINOIS INC.; PEERLESS INDUSTRIES INC.; PNEUMO-ABEX LLC, individually and as successor to Abex Corp.; PRICE PFISTER INC.; THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · February 24, 2015 · in the opinion

    Sroka v. Union Carbide Corp. (2015)

    …Paul Sroka, as plaintiffs. ECF No. 90-3. \[2\] The Plaintiffs also sued Union Carbide Corporation; John Crane-Houdaille, Inc.; Owens-Illinois Glass Company; E.L. Stebbing & Co., Inc.; Hampshire Industries, Inc.; Universal Refractories Company; J…

  3. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · September 22, 2015 · in the opinion

    Foreman v. AO Smith Corp. (2015)

    …Id. We must look to the plain language of the releases; "\Maryland follows the objective law of contract interpretation and construction.'" Hashmi, 188 Md.App. at 446, quoting Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Cook, 386 Md. 468…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 25, 2014 · in the opinion

    Lovelace v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2014)

    …tortfeasors, we "resolve all conflicts in the evidence in favor of respondent, and indulge all legitimate and reasonable inferences in support of the judgment." (Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 471…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 26, 2013 · in the opinion

    Hoyt v. Lockheed Shipbuilding Company (2013)

    …Court does not read the Supreme Court's footnote in Simonetta as a wholesale rejection of the relevance of foreseeability to the analysis of whether a party owes a duty of care in a particular situation…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · June 21, 2021 · in the opinion

    Petrie v. Novelis Corporation (2021)

    …evidence of a quantified defendant-specific dose sufficient to show a doubling of the risk of contracting mesothelioma is not required. See ECF 58 at 16 (citing Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 941 P.2d 1203…

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 18, 2019

    Lewis v. QCP (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …raises credibility issues that cannot be resolved on papers. Causation; Product Identification Worksites: Restaurants and pizzerias with Bakers Pride pizza ovens, New York plumber Restaurants and pizzerias with Bakers Pride pizza ovens New York 1955-1965

  8. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 3, 2008

    Gregory v. Beazer East (2008)

    …Georgia-Pacific, so the widow lost on both claims. An owner who hires an independent contractor owes a duty to the contractor's employee only if it retained control over how the work was done; general…

  9. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 17, 2005 · in the opinion

    Rudy v. A-Best Products Company (2005)

    …The question of whether a landowner owes a duty to warn an independent contractor of dangerous conditions on the premises turns on whether the owner possesses "superior knowledge" or information which places him in a better…

  10. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · June 28, 2016 · in the opinion

    Mtr OF Nyc Asbestos Litig. (2016)

    …to enable the manufacturer's product to function as intended" (majority op at 778). I believe this test opens too broad an avenue of potential liability and that, in line with our precedent in this area…

  11. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 1, 2009 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Smith (2009)

    …or third party claim" and "Property owner" as "a person or entity that owns real property primarily used for commercial or business purposes"). We note that our sister court has recently issued a plurality opinion questioning…

  12. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion

    Kivell v. Air Prods. and Chemicals (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …is a distinction between hazards that are inherent in a defendant's premises (for which a premises owner owes a duty) and hazards inherent in an independent contractor's job (for which a premises owner does…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · March 30, 2018 · in the opinion

    Stearns v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. (2018)

    …to, and created by, its independent contractors. Under Massachusetts law, a landowner owes a duty of reasonable care to the employees of its independent contractors. Diodato v. United States, 972 F.2d 337 (1st Cir. 1992…

  14. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · May 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    McKENNEY'S Inc. v. Sinyard (2019)

    …Brooks v. Sessoms, 47 Ga. App. 554-555 (1), 171 S.E. 222 (1933). See also Mayo v. Owen, 208 Ga. 483, 486 (1), 67 S.E.2d 709 (1951); OCGA § 24-6-602. Therefore, in…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · June 9, 2015 · in the opinion

    Nuutinen v. CBS Corporation (2015)

    …whether a union pension or otherwise; and (c) life insurance proceeds. CBS concedes that this evidence is barred by the collateral source rule, unless the plaintiff opens the door for impeachment purposes. Leitinger v. DBart, Inc.…

  16. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · January 10, 2002 · in the opinion

    Harris v. AC & S., Inc. (2002)

    …who worked on the roof and other parts of the Open Hearth." (Serna R. 30). As a mason, he repaired and maintained furnaces and ovens used to make steel. On March 18, 1998, Dr. Mark K…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 27, 2016 · in the opinion

    Dandridge v. Crane Co. (2016)

    …rule under maritime law that "a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." Conner…

  18. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 1, 1988 · in the opinion

    H & H Plumbing Co. v. Indus. Comm'n (1988)

    …the boilers, not A & K. Alexander testified that even fiberglass insulation creates some dust when it is cut. Claimant also alleges that he was exposed to asbestos through the welding blankets used at the plant. Claimant…

  19. Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · August 23, 2007 · in the opinion

    General Elec. Co. v. Cain (2007)

    …a Ford engineer. They indicated that assembly lines, ovens, steel components, and extensive conveyor systems were necessary and essential to the manufacture and production of motor vehicles and that the dismantling of old assembly lines and…

  20. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion

    Kivell v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …is a distinction between hazards that are inherent in a defendant's premises (for which a premises owner owes a duty) and hazards inherent in an independent contractor's job (for which a premises owner does…