131 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 7 of 7
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · January 21, 2016 · in the opinion
Holzworth v. Alfa Laval Inc. (2016)
…nder maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute."), with Quirin v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York · May 1, 2000 · in the opinion
Falise v. American Tobacco Co. (2000)
…Page Keeton, Dan B. Dobbs, Robert E. Keeton, & David G. Owen, Prosser & Keeton on the Law of Torts, § 42, at 279 (5th ed. 1984)) \[Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts\] (quoting 1 Street, Foundations…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 11, 2019 · in the opinion
Miller v. AO Smith Water Prods. (2019)
…should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state (CPLR § 302\[a\]\[1\]…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 25, 2021 · in the opinion
Nelson v. 3M Co. (2021)
…in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state." Here, defendant contends that this court does not have general jurisdiction over…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion
Witte v. Algoma Hardwoods, Inc. (2021)
…ii) expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state. Here…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 12, 2019 · in the opinion
English v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state (CPLR § 302\[a\]\[1\]…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Christy v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…valves, generators, pumps, turbines, compressors, cranes, brakes, ovens, ladles, gloves and aprons. As a laborer installed wall board, used joint compound and worked with floor tiles. JOHN MARMARA: Living with lung cancer. Exposed from 1962-63…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · February 20, 1990 · in the opinion
Grispo v. Eagle-Picher Indus. (In re Joint E. & S. Dist. New York Asbestos Lit., 1990)
…Keeton, D. Dobbs, R. Keeton & D. Owen, Prosser and Keeton on Torts § 99, at 695-98 (5th ed. 1984). The plaintiffs' claims concededly are governed by New York law where federal law does not apply and…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 17, 2013 · in the opinion
Frieder v. Long Is. RR (2013)
…duty of care to him. It has long been the rule in New York that a landowner owes a duty of care to maintain his or her property in a reasonably safe condition. (Gronski v County…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 14, 2020 · in the opinion
Montell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state." (CPLR …
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 20, 2020 · in the opinion
English v. Avon Prods., Inc. (2020)
…reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state. In the case at bar…