149 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 7 of 8
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 9, 2016 · in the opinion
Winhauer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
…is key to a plaintiffs claim. Id. A claim for failure to warn may be based on a theory of negligence or strict liability. O'Flynn v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, 759 So. 2d 526, 535 (Miss…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 29, 2012 · in the opinion
Fisher v. Sexauer (2012)
…Armstrong World Industries, Inc. 799 A.2d 71, 86 (Pa.Super.2002) (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning, 729 A.2d 614, 622-23 (Pa.Super.1999)). Nevertheless, Eckenrod's threshold standard does not establish an immutable…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 24, 2016 · in the opinion
The Marley-Wylain Co. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2016)
…and distributors to strict products liability. (O'Neil v. Crane Co. (2012) 53 Cal.4th 335, 347; Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995.) Michigan does not. (Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 16, 2014 · in the opinion
Dougherty v. AO Smith Corporation (2014)
…federal defense; and (4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d Cir. 1998…
-
Court case · Florida Supreme Court · March 17, 1988 · in the opinion
Celotex Corp. v. Meehan (1988)
…been diagnosed with asbestosis will not inevitably contract either mesothelioma or lung cancer); Lavelle v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 30 Ohio Misc.2d 11, 507 N.E.2d 476 (1987)(a plaintiff can never prove causation…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · October 18, 2001 · in the opinion
Jurich v. Garlock, Inc. (2001)
…whom an injured plaintiff otherwise could have sought recovery, his or her tort remedy is far from complete. This fact is highlighted by our supreme court's recent decision in Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. Cobb…
-
Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · March 10, 2003 · in the opinion
Norfolk & Western R. Co. v. Ayers (2003)
…App. 1993) (citing Hagerty v. L & L Marine Servs., Inc., 788 F. 2d 315, 318 (CA5 1986)); Lavelle v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 30 Ohio Misc. 2d 11, 14, 507 N. E. 2d 476, 480 (Ct…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · November 26, 2013 · in the opinion
Cabasug v. Crane Company (2013)
…the December 23, 2013 hearing prepared to argue the issue of successor liability. \[3\] See, e.g., Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 716 (4th Cir. 1995) (North Carolina law); Jackson v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 13, 2016 · in the opinion
Winhauer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
…is key to a plaintiffs claim. Id. A claim for failure to warn may be based on a theory of negligence or strict liability. O'Flynn v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, 759 So. 2d 526, 535 (Miss…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 18, 2019
Lewis v. QCP (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…raises credibility issues that cannot be resolved on papers. Causation; Product Identification Worksites: Restaurants and pizzerias with Bakers Pride pizza ovens, New York plumber Restaurants and pizzerias with Bakers Pride pizza ovens New York 1955-1965
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 17, 2005 · in the opinion
Rudy v. A-Best Products Company (2005)
…The question of whether a landowner owes a duty to warn an independent contractor of dangerous conditions on the premises turns on whether the owner possesses "superior knowledge" or information which places him in a better…
-
Court case · New York Court of Appeals · June 28, 2016 · in the opinion
Mtr OF Nyc Asbestos Litig. (2016)
…to enable the manufacturer's product to function as intended" (majority op at 778). I believe this test opens too broad an avenue of potential liability and that, in line with our precedent in this area…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 1, 2009 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Smith (2009)
…or third party claim" and "Property owner" as "a person or entity that owns real property primarily used for commercial or business purposes"). We note that our sister court has recently issued a plurality opinion questioning…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Kivell v. Air Prods. and Chemicals (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…is a distinction between hazards that are inherent in a defendant's premises (for which a premises owner owes a duty) and hazards inherent in an independent contractor's job (for which a premises owner does…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · March 30, 2018 · in the opinion
Stearns v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. (2018)
…to, and created by, its independent contractors. Under Massachusetts law, a landowner owes a duty of reasonable care to the employees of its independent contractors. Diodato v. United States, 972 F.2d 337 (1st Cir. 1992…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · June 9, 2015 · in the opinion
Nuutinen v. CBS Corporation (2015)
…whether a union pension or otherwise; and (c) life insurance proceeds. CBS concedes that this evidence is barred by the collateral source rule, unless the plaintiff opens the door for impeachment purposes. Leitinger v. DBart, Inc.…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · January 10, 2002 · in the opinion
Harris v. AC & S., Inc. (2002)
…who worked on the roof and other parts of the Open Hearth." (Serna R. 30). As a mason, he repaired and maintained furnaces and ovens used to make steel. On March 18, 1998, Dr. Mark K…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 27, 2016 · in the opinion
Dandridge v. Crane Co. (2016)
…rule under maritime law that "a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." Conner…
-
Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · August 23, 2007 · in the opinion
General Elec. Co. v. Cain (2007)
…a Ford engineer. They indicated that assembly lines, ovens, steel components, and extensive conveyor systems were necessary and essential to the manufacture and production of motor vehicles and that the dismantling of old assembly lines and…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Kivell v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…is a distinction between hazards that are inherent in a defendant's premises (for which a premises owner owes a duty) and hazards inherent in an independent contractor's job (for which a premises owner does…