292 results for “General Electric”, page 8 of 15
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 27, 2019 · in the opinion
Schildknegt v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp. (2019)
…App.4th 246, 251-254 \[affirming summary judgment in favor of general contractor on ground plaintiff lacked evidence he was present when the general contractor's employees performed insulation work likely to release asbestos dust\]; Casey…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 31, 1995 · in the opinion
Lineaweaver v. Plant Insulation Co. (1995)
…914 F.2d 360, 372-373, 383.) Other cases dispense entirely with evidence of where a product was used by merely requiring proof that it was in general use at an industrial facility. Thus, Martin v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · May 7, 2021 · in the opinion
Spurlin v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…be contrary to the command for uniformity between rules governing the same injury, whether under the Jones Act or under the general maritime law. See id. There being no evidence that punitive damages were traditionally awarded…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 6, 2013 · in the opinion
Klinger v. Alderete (2013)
…p. 34.) Although the defendant in Campbell was a property owner, not a general contractor employer, at least some of the reasoning expressed in Campbell for finding no liability would potentially apply to the underlying lawsuit…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 29, 2011 · in the opinion
Adams v. Ford Motor Company (2011)
…and Respondent. JOHNSON, J. Appellants Billie Jean Adams and her three children (Adams) brought suit for general and special damages against respondent Ford Motor Company (Ford) following the death of their husband and father, Richard Adams…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · October 1, 2021 · in the opinion
Dietrich v. Boeing Company (2021)
…which creates an exception to the general rule denying appellate review of remand orders for "an order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed pursuant to section 1442 or 1443 of…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 22, 2015 · in the opinion
Hernandezcueva v. EF Brady Company, Inc. (2015)
…Id. at pp. 1144-1149). Noting that subcontractors generally work under the supervision of the general contractor, have little control over the project's specifications, and are usually less well capitalized and insured than the developer…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 4, 2021 · in the opinion
Swanson v. The Marley-Wylain Co. (2021)
…If the instruction is incomplete or erroneous the trial judge may, as he did here, properly refuse it."'" (Olive v. General Nutrition Centers, Inc. (2018) 30 Cal.App.5th 804, 813 \[242 Cal.Rptr.3d 15\]…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2012 · in the opinion
Shields v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2012)
…53 Cal.4th 335, also supports this argument. B. Tellez-Cordova In Tellez-Cordova, the court conducted an analysis of a ruling sustaining a general demurrer involving a similar issue. (Tellez-Cordova, supra, 129 Cal.App…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 17, 2010 · in the opinion
Smith v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2010)
…reasonable probability that in the absence of the error, a result more favorable to the appealing party would have been reached." (Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 548, 574.) "It is well settled…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · January 10, 2025 · in the opinion
Holste v. 3M Company (2025)
…cv-09814-JLS-E. January 10, 2025. United States District Court, C.D. California. CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL JOSEPHINE L. STATON, District Judge. (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND (Doc. 34) Before the Court is…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2010 · in the opinion
Davis v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2010)
…user defense, the ordinary users would have been Davis's employers, not Davis. As support, appellants cite Maneely v. General Motors Corp. (9th Cir. 1997) 108 F.3d 1176. In Maneely, applying California law, the court…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 18, 2015 · in the opinion
Greenberg v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2015)
…8 Cal.3d at p. 126; accord, Horn v. General Motors Corp., supra, 17 Cal.3d at p. 366.) O'Neil In O'Neil, our Supreme Court examined the extent to which a manufacturer may be…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2014 · in the opinion
Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)
…which may be as little as three months." Though acknowledging a "general inference that Crocidolite \[asbestos\] is more liable to produce mesothelioma," the report cautioned that "\[e\]xoneration of \[Union Carbide's\] Chrysotile \[asbestos\] has not…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · April 5, 2023 · in the opinion
Gemaehlich v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)
…and GRANTS the Gemaehlichs' motion to remand. "It is the general rule that an action may be removed from state court to federal court only if a federal district court would have original jurisdiction over the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · September 21, 2022 · in the opinion
Darden v. Western Asbestos Settlement Trust (In re Western Asbestos Settlement Trust, 2022)
…named in a release to be included in the release. "\[T\]o obtain summary judgment on the ground that a general release has discharged him from liability, a third party to the release agreement must affirmatively…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 26, 2017 · in the opinion
City of Pasadena v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2017)
…Pooshs v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. (2011) 51 Cal.4th 788, 797 (Pooshs).) An exception to the general rule regarding the initial accrual of a claim is the discovery rule. (Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc. …
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 29, 2020 · in the opinion
Bader v. Avon Products, Inc. (2020)
…italics added.) Finally, while Avon accurately cites cases reciting the general rule that the merits of a dispute are not at issue at the jurisdictional stage, but proof of jurisdictional facts may at times overlap with…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 15, 2007 · in the opinion
Honer v. Ford Motor Company (2007)
…fibers. Honer then breathed these asbestos fibers because of her direct and indirect contact with her father and brother themselves as well as their clothes, vehicles, tools and general surroundings. In July 2004, Honer alleged, she…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2018 · in the opinion
Trapp v. CertainTEED Corporation (2018)
…at p. 1143.) The Supreme Court explained: "By making exceptions to Civil Code section 1714's general duty of ordinary care only when foreseeability and policy considerations justify a categorical no-duty rule, we preserve the…