235 results for “General Electric”, page 8 of 12
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · June 26, 2000 · in the opinion
Baker v. ACandS (2000)
He provided the following context: a party who signs a general release waiving all claims and discharging all parties will be precluded from thereafter suing a party who did not contribute consideration toward the release. However…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion
Roverano v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)
Indeed, I believe that if the General Assembly had intended to do the opposite within the contours of a "Fair Share Act" — i.e., to maintain a liability allocation regime for strict liability cases that was…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 16, 2013 · in the opinion
In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2013)
…that "\[t\]he Trustees shall consult with the TAC and the Future Claimants' Representative (i) on the general implementation and administration of the Asbestos PI Trust; (ii) on the general implementation and administration of the TDP…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · December 8, 2022 · in the opinion
In re All Matters Related TO North American Refractories Company (2022)
…therefore, the Trust would have the burden of showing why this general principle should be set aside in this particular instance. The Trust has not cited to any authority in support of its position and the…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · September 19, 1973 · in the opinion
Utter et al. v. Asten-Hill Mfg. Co. (1973)
…exposed, in this industry, as he might very well be, to the common cold and that it is peculiar to the industry and not common to the general public." 203 Pa. Superior Ct. at 462, 201…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · March 30, 2007 · in the opinion
AstenJohnson v. Columbia Cas. Co. (2007)
…to Commerce and Industry Insurance Company, Asten represented: "It has been our policy to apprise Asten-Hill \[Manufacturing Company\]'s general liability and excess liability carriers of all pending claims, enclosing a photocopy of each Complaint…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 9, 1992
Taliferro v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1992)
…Fear of Cancer and Medical Monitoring; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Philadelphia Naval Shipyard (Philadelphia Navy Yard); Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Philadelphia laborer doing general cleanup and debris removal on ships Philadelphia Naval Shipyard Philadelphia 1967-1981
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · December 3, 2009
Hogston v. Allis-Chalmers Corp. (2009)
…may be shown by circumstantial evidence, but the evidence must make it probable rather than merely possible. A general distribution area and franchise, without evidence of deliveries to the plant, does not suffice when another distributor…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · January 16, 2019
Youse & Youse v. Johnson & Johnson (2019)
…is a citizen of the forum state. Under Bane, registration to do business in Pennsylvania is sufficient for general personal jurisdiction, absent Third Circuit or Supreme Court direction to the contrary after Daimler. Personal Jurisdiction; Venue…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · December 4, 2009
Hogston v. Allis-Chalmers Corp. (2009)
…s asbestos product, but it must show probability rather than possibility. A distributor's general franchise territory, without evidence of deliveries to the plant and with direct evidence that another distributor supplied it, does not let…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · July 27, 1990
JH France Refractories v. Allstate Insurance Co. (1990)
…s allocation and held that insurers pay pro rata by time on the risk, with France bearing uninsured periods. Under comprehensive general liability policies, the entire asbestos disease process from first exposure to manifestation triggers coverage…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · January 4, 2023
Shellenberger v. Kreider Farms (2023)
…Failure to Warn; Premises Owner Liability; Employer and Contractor Liability, and Workers' Compensation; Wrongful Death and Survival Worksites: Kreider Farms dairy processing plant general manager of dairy plant operations Kreider Farms dairy processing plant 1972-1980
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · July 27, 1992 · in the opinion
United Nat. Ins. Co. v. JH France Refractories Co. (1992)
… rather, it seeks to apply the general rule which requires an action to be brought within the statutory period from the time when the right to institute and maintain the suit arose. Because Appellant had that…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 16, 2011 · in the opinion
In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2011)
…they function together. This finding is supported by evidence of record, including testimony cited by Mt. McKinley which established that Corning's General Counsel and Rule 30(b)(6) witness, Vincent P. Hatton, could not specify…
-
Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · February 29, 2012 · in the opinion
Kurns v. Railroad Friction Products Corp. (2012)
…Ante, at 1268. That is insufficient. Not every state law that "could be said to affect tangentially" matters within the regulated field is pre-empted. English v. General Elec. Co., 496 U.S. 72, 85, 110…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · October 1, 2010 · in the opinion
Peter & Elpis Constantinides v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2010)
…125-8). Defendant asserts that this is a general, speculative statement and is insufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact. While it is true that Plaintiffs' expert does not directly controvert Defendant's expert…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · September 9, 2013 · in the opinion
Williams v. Lockheed Martin Corp. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2013)
…like opposing counsel talking to employees of his clients and that he holds himself to the same standard. He chooses as a general rule not to speak to employees of opposing counsel's clients. July 15…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · October 8, 2010 · in the opinion
Peter & Elpis Constantinides v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2010)
…125-8). Defendant asserts that this is a general, speculative statement and is insufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact. While it is true that Plaintiffs' expert does not directly controvert Defendant's expert…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · April 14, 1995 · in the opinion
Kirk v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1995)
…the petit jury venire. The Supreme Court announced a general rule that "\[t\]he denial or impairment of the right \[to exercise peremptory challenges\] is reversible error without a showing of prejudice." Swain, 380 U.S…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · June 22, 2017 · in the opinion
Smith v. Wenerowicz (2017)
…NEEDLEMAN, FINEMAN KREKSTEIN & HARRIS. MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, Defendant, represented by RANDALL J. HENZES & MEGAN K. KAMPF, OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL. JAMES MISSTISHIN SR., Defendant, represented by RANDALL J. HENZES. CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN, Defendant, represented by RANDALL J…