No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

160 results for “General Electric”, page 8 of 8

  1. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · May 22, 2006 · in the opinion

    Creech v. Agco Corporation (2006)

    …Corporation when it bought the Kewanee boiler division assets from American Standard. The general rule in Washington is that a corporation purchasing the assets of another corporation does not, by reason of the purchase of assets…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · July 29, 2013 · in the opinion

    Jensen v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (2013)

    …Inc., 236 F.3d 1061, 1067 (9th Cir. 2001)(citing McCabe v. General Foods Corp., 811 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir. 1987)). The non-diverse defendant has been fraudulently joined if the plaintiff fails to…

  3. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · April 29, 2022 · in the opinion

    Deem v. William Powell Co. (2022)

    …1434 (1997), noted that "twice the Supreme Court has been presented with federal statute of limitations language materially identical to that in the general maritime statute of limitations, and twice the Supreme Court has held that…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 9, 2013 · in the opinion

    Lefevre v. CBS Corporation (2013)

    …To avoid this result, courts have developed four exceptions to the general rule that liabilities are not transferred: (1) the purchaser expressly or impliedly agrees to assume liability; (2) the purchase is a de facto merger…

  5. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 24, 2009 · in the opinion

    Cashman v. Pacific Scientific Company (2009)

    …was presumptively a part of furnace insulation during the 1960s and 1970s. He testified, "My experience and the general understanding is that while there may have been Marigold ceramics, other options available, as there are today…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · July 20, 2018 · in the opinion

    Clayton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2018)

    …negligence, premises liability, conspiracy, and strict liability for abnormally dangerous activities. (SAC § V.) They seek general and special damages for pain, suffering, "loss of spousal relationship," disability, medical expenses, and economic loss. (Id.) Saberhagen moves for…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 6, 2014 · in the opinion

    McMann v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2014)

    …In this way, the statute "promotes litigating federal defenses in a federal forum so that \the operations of the general government \[are not\] arrested at the will of one of \[the states\]." Ruppel v. CBS Corp…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 30, 2014 · in the opinion

    Barabin v. AstenJOHNSON, Inc. (2014)

    …34); Gould MTD (Dkt. \# 36).) II. ANALYSIS A. Removal Jurisdiction In general, a defendant may remove to federal court any state action over which a district court would have original jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. …

  9. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 8, 2010 · in the opinion

    Cashman v. Pacific Scientific Company (2010)

    …potential importance or relevance of the missing evidence and (2) the culpability or fault of the adverse party. "After weighing these two general factors, the trial court uses its discretion to craft an appropriate sanction." Homeworks…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    Jack v. Dco, LLC (2019)

    …both companies. (Id.) C. The Jury's Verdict The court provided the jury a general verdict form on which the jury was asked whether Plaintiffs proved their strict liability design defect, strict liability failure-to-warn…

  11. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 29, 2013 · in the opinion

    Walston v. Boeing Company (2013)

    …individuals will develop \[m\]esothelioma" or other asbestos related diseases. CP at 2855. Mesothelioma is extremely rare in the general population, including exposed workers. But among certain groups of workers with the highest cumulative asbestos exposure…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 20, 2013 · in the opinion

    Botts v. US (2013)

    …Id.) Mr. Eberhard states that, when employees worked with asbestos materials in "saw shacks," the shacks grew quite dusty, and employees often opened the door to allow dust to escape into the general atmosphere. (Eberhard Dec. ¶…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 17, 2018 · in the opinion

    Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2018)

    …and consortium. Id. \[25\] The Green court recognized a narrow exception to the general rule against recovery for premarital injuries in toxic exposure cases, where the injured spouse does not or cannot know of the injury…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · April 15, 2024 · in the opinion

    Perkins v. United States (2024)

    …known or potential error rate, and general acceptance." Elosu at 1024 (internal citations omitted). These reliability factors are nonexclusive — "the trial court has discretion to decide how to test an expert's reliability based on the…

  15. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 19, 2008 · in the opinion

    Butler v. Amtico International Inc. (2008)

    …5) how the plaintiff handled and used those products, (6) expert testimony on the effects of inhalation of asbestos on human health in general and the plaintiff in particular, (7) evidence of any other substances that…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 2, 2014 · in the opinion

    McMann v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)

    …an exception to the general rule that employers are not liable for injuries suffered by independent contractors: "A common-law exception to the rule of nonliability \[for injuries to independent contractors\] exists where the employer of…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 27, 2024 · in the opinion

    Perkins v. United States (2024)

    …Government's actionable conduct. Plaintiff did not meet this burden of proof by presenting general evidence that there was asbestos work performed at H.J.'s worksite or expert testimony that H.J. would have been…

  18. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · July 16, 1992 · in the opinion

    Bowers v. Fibreboard Corporation (1992)

    …admitted all but one of the books into evidence, apparently under a then existing exception to the hearsay rule for treatises dealing with events of general history. Appellants challenged the trial court's exclusion of the…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · July 6, 2023 · in the opinion

    Welch v. Crane Co. (2023)

    …each of their experts' reports, and Plaintiff will have the opportunity to object to such testimony at trial. And general causation testimony may be relevant and helpful to the trier of fact. Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation…

  20. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 4, 1991 · in the opinion

    Koker v. Armstrong Cork, Inc. (1991)

    …344, 348, 693 P.2d 687 (1985): In an ordinary personal injury action, the general rule is that a cause of action "accrues" at the time the act or omission occurs. In certain torts, however, injured…