No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

227 results for “General Electric”, page 8 of 12

  1. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 1, 2022 · in the opinion

    Carroll v. Akebono Brake Corporation (2022)

    …and that it should be construed, not as a grant of power to make broad and general rules, but as a limitation upon the courts requiring that the customary rules having to do with the minutiæ…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 7, 2019 · in the opinion

    Michel v. Ford Motor Company (2019)

    …to this case is thus incorrect. In any event, Dr. Staggs's general causation testimony clearly considers both types of asbestos and the possible differences between them. He acknowledges that, "some scientist\[s\] believe there's…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · March 3, 2020 · in the opinion

    Paroni EX rel. Estate OF Paroni v. Alstom SA (2020)

    …contacts with New York, Elodie relies most heavily on Alstom's website's statement that its "U.S. Headquarters" are in New York to argue that Alstom is subject to general jurisdiction here. See Pl. Mem…

  4. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · May 17, 2017 · in the opinion

    Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v. Jones (2017)

    …Jurisdiction and Minimum Contacts Mrs. Jones concedes that general jurisdiction does not lie and that she is proceeding only on a theory of specific jurisdiction under section 48.193(1)(a)(6), which provides for specific…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · April 4, 2017 · in the opinion

    Hart v. Honeywell International (2017)

    …found by an Ohio appellate court to be less complex than necessary to trigger the need for an expert witness in a design defect case. Atkins v. General Motors, 132 Ohio App. 3d 556 (Ohio Ct…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2003 · in the opinion

    Ferris v. Gatke Corporation (2003)

    …our opinion concluded, that "the peculiar facts presented by exposure to asbestos fiber from brake pads" made general order 21 "inapplicable to the facts of the claim stated by plaintiffs." Plaintiffs, Wheeler went on to point…

  7. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · January 31, 2019 · in the opinion

    Knecht v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …other words, an adequate warning might have allowed someone to avoid a risk of mesothelioma had there been an adequate warning. Because Ford's products were defective in that general way, and because Mr. Knecht was…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 29, 2011 · in the opinion

    Adams v. Ford Motor Company (2011)

    …and Respondent. JOHNSON, J. Appellants Billie Jean Adams and her three children (Adams) brought suit for general and special damages against respondent Ford Motor Company (Ford) following the death of their husband and father, Richard Adams…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2012 · in the opinion

    Shields v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2012)

    …53 Cal.4th 335, also supports this argument. B. Tellez-Cordova In Tellez-Cordova, the court conducted an analysis of a ruling sustaining a general demurrer involving a similar issue. (Tellez-Cordova, supra, 129 Cal.App…

  10. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 11, 2012 · in the opinion

    Gaskill v. Abex Corporation (2012)

    …Defendants-Respondents, and AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR COMPANY, INC., BORG-WARNER CORPORATION c/o Burns International Services Corporation; CHRYSLER CORPORATION, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, GENUINE PARTS COMPANY, MARTIN CHRYSLER, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., TOYOTA MOTOR MFG. NORTH AMERICA…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 17, 2010 · in the opinion

    Smith v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2010)

    …reasonable probability that in the absence of the error, a result more favorable to the appealing party would have been reached." (Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 548, 574.) "It is well settled…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 18, 2015 · in the opinion

    Greenberg v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2015)

    …8 Cal.3d at p. 126; accord, Horn v. General Motors Corp., supra, 17 Cal.3d at p. 366.) O'Neil In O'Neil, our Supreme Court examined the extent to which a manufacturer may be…

  13. Medical study · Medical research · 1994

    Mortality studies of machining fluid exposure in the automobile industry. III: A case-control study of larynx cancer

    …This is the first study, however, to distinguish straight mineral oils from other types of MF. Based on these findings, a general reduction in concentrations of straight mineral oil particulate in occupational environments would be prudent.

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 26, 2017 · in the opinion

    City of Pasadena v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2017)

    …Pooshs v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. (2011) 51 Cal.4th 788, 797 (Pooshs).) An exception to the general rule regarding the initial accrual of a claim is the discovery rule. (Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc. …

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 19, 2021 · in the opinion

    Labarre v. Bienville Auto Parts, Inc. (2021)

    …original). In Loupe v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co., the other paper that started the clock for removal was a deposition transcript that showed the plaintiff personally worked with asbestos in the construction of federal ships. 2016…

  16. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · November 8, 2017 · in the opinion

    Leathers v. Pneumo Abex (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …in Rhode Island.\[1\] The Court noted that "this test comports with \[their\] Supreme Court's general causation jurisprudence and fairly balances the interests of plaintiffs and defendants."\[2\] The Sweredoski decision is a 2013 decision…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 3, 2016 · in the opinion

    Davis v. Honeywell International Inc. (2016)

    …to \determine whether, as a matter of logic, the studies and other information cited by experts adequately support the conclusion that the expert's general theory or technique is valid.'" (Sargon, supra, 55 Cal.4th at…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion

    Petitpas v. Ford Motor Company (2017)

    …1103.) Even assuming Dr. Horn is correct as to the cause of mesothelioma in general, plaintiffs had the burden to prove that exposure to asbestos-containing materials at Rossmoor was a substantial factor in contributing to…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · September 25, 2018 · in the opinion

    Doolin v. Ford Motor Company (2018)

    …401 F.3d at 1242. The four criteria are as follows: (1) has the toxic substance in question been demonstrated to cause the type of illness or disease in question (general causation), (2) was the individual…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 19, 2012 · in the opinion

    Bankhead v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. (2012)

    …1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1128, 1137-1138 \[74 Cal.Rptr.2d 510\] (Weeks).) We give only a general summary of the facts relating to liability and compensatory damages, because the details are not germane to…