155 results for “General Electric”, page 8 of 8
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · August 22, 2012 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Aubin (2012)
…is required to warn end-users directly: There is no general rule as to whether one supplying a product for the use of others through an intermediary has a duty to warn the ultimate product user…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 10, 2018 · in the opinion
Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2018)
…support a jury conclusion that W&G was the primary insulation contractor working at LRHS. This is not a case in which evidence was presented showing the general presence of asbestos-containing products at LRHS. Accordingly…
-
Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · October 5, 2022 · in the opinion
Miller v. Agripac, Inc. (2022)
…to joint and several liability for plaintiffs' damages, the jury was not asked to apportion liability among the defendants. The court entered a general judgment in plaintiffs' favor, which included a money award requiring defendant to…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 4, 2011 · in the opinion
Robertson v. Doug Ashy Building Materials, Inc. (2011)
…Mark, a 1967 Harvard Medical School graduate, is employed as a pathologist in the Department of Pathology at Massachusetts General Hospital and practices primarily in pulmonary and autopsy pathology. Dr. Mark is also a professor at…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 18, 2018 · in the opinion
Vanhoy v. American International Industries (2018)
…to understate the hazards of asbestos exposure, all for their own profit and gain, Defendant \[Metropolitan Life Insurance Company\] willfully, wantonly, and with malice in calculated disregard for the welfare of the general public. . . . (Am. Compl…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 12, 2022 · in the opinion
Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)
…382 F.3d 546, 562 (5th Cir.2004) (noting that "\[a\]s a general rule, questions relating to the bases and sources of an expert's opinion affect the weight to be assigned that opinion rather…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · October 24, 2012 · in the opinion
Rich v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2012)
…Georgia plant. Rather, Lehnert's testimony was about Georgia Pacific's general use of asbestos, including its decision to remove asbestos from its products, the notice and information that they had at the time they made…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Collin v. Calportland Company (2014)
…Corp. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 1222, 1231 (Casey).) In Casey, the plaintiff accused the defendant, a general contractor, of exposing him to asbestos at jobsites where the plaintiff worked for a subcontractor. (Id. at p…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · September 20, 2018 · in the opinion
Highland Stucco and Lime Products, Inc. v. Onorato (2018)
…is established by demonstrating either general or specific jurisdiction. Teva Pharm. Indus. v. Ruiz, 181 So. 3d 513, 517 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015). General jurisdiction is established where the defendant has engaged in substantial and not…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 25, 2011 · in the opinion
Graham v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2011)
…is contemplated by it. Moreover, if defendant is concerned that plaintiffs counsel is on a general fishing expedition, then defendant's remedy is to screen and redact any information beyond the scope of plaintiffs request. Accordingly…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · November 21, 2018 · in the opinion
Highland Stucco and Lime v. Onorato (2018)
…is established by demonstrating either general or specific jurisdiction. Teva Pharm. Indus. v. Ruiz, 181 So.3d 513, 517 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015). General jurisdiction is established where the defendant has engaged in substantial and not…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 15, 2016 · in the opinion
DePREE v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2016)
…auto body filler from Grand Auto, and it came in cans bearing the name "Bondo." Although Mr. DePree testified in general terms about his work involving Bondo, with one exception, he was unable to recall the…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · June 20, 2012 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Aubin (2012)
…is required to warn end-users directly: There is no general rule as to whether one supplying a product for the use of others through an intermediary has a duty to warn the ultimate product user…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · May 21, 2018 · in the opinion
Conda v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2018)
…causation experts were foundationally reliable and properly admitted" and that "those opinions established a prima facie case of general and specific causation using the legal standard established by the court when trial commenced." The district court…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 3, 2014 · in the opinion
Feuerman v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2014)
…All seven of the plaintiffs in proposed joint trial Group One are alleged to have been exposed, in general, to asbestos at commercial and residential job sites in and around the New York City area while…