286 results for “General Electric”, page 8 of 15
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 10, 2019
Serrano v. Superior Boiler Works (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…locations in Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens and other boroughs, New York helper to a general contractor apartment buildings in the South Bronx Bronx 1962-1965; Boiler Technician apartment buildings, residential homes and commercial locations in Manhattan, Brooklyn…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · November 23, 2021
Johnson v. Orton (2021)
…Circuit's Krik decision. It limited Monona Rossol to ceramics, as agreed. It limited Dr. Barry Castleman to general historical testimony, barring opinions on Vanderbilt's knowledge, motives or lobbying. It allowed Dr. William Longo's…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013
Kiser v. AW Chesterton Co. (2013)
…accrued at the first diagnosis, asbestosis, not the later mesothelioma diagnosis. The court said any change must come from the General Assembly. Two justices dissented. They would have treated mesothelioma as a separate cause of action.
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 29, 2019
Mantovi v. American Biltrite (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…types or to exposure levels in other studies. The court found the plaintiffs had not raised a triable issue on general or specific causation and granted the motion. It dismissed the claims and cross-claims against…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · November 29, 1993
Angelo v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1993)
…It upheld exclusion of a treating doctor's deposition because the Angelos had not shown diligent efforts to secure his attendance. It found the reverse bifurcation proper, and the jury instructions and general verdict form adequate.
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 2013
Wannall v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2013)
…held that the earlier expert opinions, which spoke only of cumulative exposure, substantial contribution or general risk, did not show that the brake exposure alone was sufficient to cause the cancer. It said the new declaration…
-
Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · August 3, 2022 · in the opinion
Edwards v. Scapa Waycross, Inc. (2022)
…814 (D.S.C. 2011)). "General causation \is generally not an issue in asbestos litigation' due to the parties' acknowledgment that exposure to asbestos causes mesothelioma." Id. at 625, 869 S.E.2d at 829 (quoting…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · July 31, 2002 · in the opinion
Hebert v. Anco Insulation, Inc. (2002)
…Ed.2d 379 (1994). Only if the appellate court finds an abuse of that discretion may it examine prior awards of general damages to determine the amount the trier of fact reasonable could award. Theriot v…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · August 24, 2020 · in the opinion
Finch v. Covil Corporation (2020)
As we have explained: \[J\]ury instructions articulate general principles of law that decide cases. Of course appellate opinions may guide a district judge's discretion in formulating jury instructions, or even bear upon the formation…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 20, 2006 · in the opinion
Chaisson v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2006)
Accordingly, we hold that Zachry breached its general duty, under the facts and circumstances of this case, to Mrs. Chaisson by putting her in foreseeable risk [\190] of contracting an asbestos related disease from household exposure…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · April 19, 2007 · in the opinion
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Altimore (2007)
Altimore or those "similarly situated" takes the focus off Exxon's knowledge of a general danger relative to the qualities of asbestos. By focusing on epidemiological studies, the majority fails to follow our earlier pronouncement that…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 18, 2011 · in the opinion
Fontes v. Interstate Brands Corporation (2011)
…also D'Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 Cal.3d 1, 21-22.) The Fonteses' General Rule 29 Case Report, General Rule 13 response to interrogatory number 26, and Mr. Fontes's deposition testimony…
-
Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · January 4, 2021 · in the opinion
Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)
There the canon avoids not contradiction but the superfluity of a specific provision that is swallowed by the general one, "violat\[ing\] the cardinal rule that, if possible, effect shall be given to every clause and…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 27, 2015
BNSF Railway Company v. Superior Court for County OF Los Angeles (2015)
…motion, because California lacked general personal jurisdiction over BNSF; the Kralovetz family lost. Under Goodyear and Daimler, a corporation is subject to general jurisdiction only where its affiliations with the state make it essentially at home…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 1, 2019
Matter of Marzigliano v. Amchem Prods., Inc. (2019)
…judgment dismissing plaintiffs' complaint and all cross-claims, finding fact issues on general and specific causation. A defendant cannot win summary judgment by pointing to gaps in plaintiffs' proof; it must make a prima facie showing…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 1, 2019
Carlstrand v. American Biltrite (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…dismiss plaintiffs' complaint and all cross-claims, finding fact issues on general and specific causation. A defendant cannot win summary judgment by pointing to gaps in plaintiff's proof, and conflicting expert reports on whether chrysotile…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Utah · March 23, 2023
Riegler v. Carlisle Companies, Incorporated (2023)
…Staggs's specific causation opinion, and granted in part and denied in part the motions to exclude: Ewing's opinion and Staggs's general causation opinion were admitted. Under Rule 702, a medical expert's specific…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · January 2, 2008 · in the opinion
Weyerhaeuser Company v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company (2008)
…2008) WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN, and OLD REPUBLIC…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · September 25, 2009 · in the opinion
In re Wilhite (2009)
…at most, that the plaintiffs are suing the same defendant for injuries caused by asbestos exposure at the same general location during the same period of time, but the documents do not show that these injuries…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 24, 2020 · in the opinion
Peterson v. Vanderbilt Minerals (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…Defendant argues that plaintiffs failed to proffer any expert opinion or other evidence establishing general and specific causation and there is no basis to sustain the cause of action for punitive damages. To prevail on a…