No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

542 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 8 of 28

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · September 10, 1973 · in the opinion

    Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation (1973)

    …1590. The Act gives the Secretary of Labor the authority to establish standards for permissible concentrations of airborne asbestos fibers. \[17\] The original complaint also named as defendants Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, Standard Asbestos Manufacturing and…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 26, 1982 · in the opinion

    Hardy v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1982)

    …Insulating, UNARCO Industries, Nicolette, and Celotex. Six of the present appellants were parties to Borel: Pittsburgh Corning, Armstrong Cork, Phillip Carey, Ruberoid, Johns-Manville, and Fibreboard Paper. Owens Corning Fiberglass, Standard Asbestos Mfg. & Insulating, UNARCO, and…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · February 2, 2016 · in the opinion

    Weis v. Dsm Copolymer, Inc. (2016)

    …is improper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(2). See Faulk v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 48 F.Supp.2d 653, 670 (E.D.Tex.1999). Accordingly, the court will focus its analysis of…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · March 30, 1992

    Borman v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1992)

    …Mrs. Borman and her husband's estate against Celotex in place. Under Pennsylvania law as predicted from Martin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, evidence that an insulator's lung disease was caused by both asbestos and smoking…

  5. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · July 21, 2010 · in the opinion

    Summers v. Certainteed Corp. (2010)

    Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 840 A.2d 1028 (Pa.Super.2004) (outlining the competing standards for establishment of a prima facie case).\[10\] The OISR then opined that Appellants, through Dr. Gelfand's reports and conclusions…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · October 5, 2004 · in the opinion

    Chicano v. General Electric Company (2004)

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 729 A.2d 614, 619-21 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1999) (applying the heeding presumption). "\[I\]n cases where warnings or instructions are required to make a product non-defective and a warning…

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 6, 2015 · in the opinion

    Galasso v. BF Goodrich (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)

    1995\]). In addition, issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557, 559-60). Where "\[t\]he deposition testimony of a litigant is sufficient to raise an issue of…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 10, 2018 · in the opinion

    Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2018)

    …is what the Court of Appeals has "termed a \bystander,' in that he did not work directly with the asbestos products but was in the vicinity of where such products were used." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 18, 2009 · in the opinion

    O'neil v. Crane Co. (2009)

    …PLC (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1224 \[53 Cal.Rptr.2d 642\]; Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1187 \[74 Cal.Rptr.2d 580\] \[raw asbestos fibers are not altered…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 22, 2010 · in the opinion

    Whitmire v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (2010)

    Such evidence is simply not "of sufficient weight to support a reasonable inference of causation." (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 656; see also McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., supra…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion

    Rollin v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2012)

    …and can be held strictly liable for injuries caused by their failure to warn. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1003.) The sophisticated user defense relieves a manufacturer from its usual…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 5, 2015 · in the opinion

    Ricci v. Crane Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)

    Grace & Co.-Conn), 216 AD2d 79 \[1st Dept. 1995\]). Issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557, 559-60). Where "\[t\]he deposition testimony of a litigant is…

  13. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 26, 2007 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Stephens (2007)

    …by defendant, and coworker testified that he used defendant's pipe covering approximately ninety percent of time and installed it in areas where plaintiff regularly worked). But cf. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 682 A…

  14. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · February 27, 1992 · in the opinion

    Stevenson v. Keene Corp. (1992)

    …of joint and several liability includes cases of "exposure to ... harmful organic or mineral substances", exception applicable to asbestos cases, McNair v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 890 F.2d 753 (5th Cir.Tex. 1989)); Haw. Rev…

  15. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · July 26, 1993 · in the opinion

    Coffman v. Keene Corp. (1993)

    …EHRET-HILL, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP., IN ITSELF AND AS SUCCESSOR TO UNARCO; H.K. PORTER CO.; RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC., SUCCESSOR TO RAYBESTOS- MANHATTAN, INC.; OWENSILLINOIS, INC.; OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.; GARLOCK, INC.;…

  16. Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · June 23, 1997 · in the opinion

    Metro-North Commuter R. Co. v. Buckley (1997)

    …see, e. g., Herber v. Johns-Manville Corp., 785 F. 2d 79, 85 (CA3 1986); Mauro v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 225 N. J. Super. 196, 542 A. 2d 16 (App. Div. 1988). But with only…

  17. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 19, 2014 · in the opinion

    Luna v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)

    …at 334. Evidence of the mere physical presence of asbestos-containing material is insufficient to find a manufacturer liable to a plaintiff. Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 2003-0248 (La.App. 1st Cir. 4/2…

  18. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · January 6, 2006 · in the opinion

    Combs v. Albert Kahn Associates, Inc. (2006)

    …of her injury until later when she had a recurrence of cancer after a period of remission). \[17\] Carroll v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 37 S.W.3d 699, 700-701 (Ky.2000) (citing David E…

  19. Court case · Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals · June 7, 2012 · in the opinion

    Olsen v. Oklahoma Gas and Elec. Co. (2012)

    …905 F.2d at 797-98. ¶ 25 The Court in Buttz v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 557 N.W.2d 90 (Iowa 1996), also rejected application of that state's statute of repose in an asbestos…

  20. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 22, 1994 · in the opinion

    Goss v. American Cyanamid Co. (1994)

    …Charles S. Woods Company, an insulation contractor and representative of Owens- Corning Fiberglass Company and a Porter Hayden competitor for insulation contract work, also bid on contract jobs at American Cyanamid between 1950 and 1965. During…