177 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 8 of 9
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 31, 2014 · in the opinion
Kent v. Warren Pumps, LLC (2014)
…the defendant (cause-in-fact) and that there is a reasonable medical probability that such exposure was a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff's injury. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · April 17, 2014 · in the opinion
Sclafani v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2014)
…whether Sclafani's exposure to defendants' products "was, in reasonable medical probability, a substantial factor in causing or contributing to his risk of developing cancer." Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953, 957-58…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 10, 2018 · in the opinion
Hake v. Allied Fluid Products Corp. (2018)
…was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 25, 2018 · in the opinion
Kraus v. Alcatel-Lucent (2018)
…that they do not have any burden to offer evidence demonstrating federal jurisdiction until the plaintiff challenges jurisdiction in a motion to remand. Dart Cherokee Basin Op. Co. v. Owens, 135 S. Ct. 547, 553 (2014)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · July 11, 2022 · in the opinion
Shelton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)
…a showing that plaintiff's "particular asbestos disease is cumulative in nature" which can be satisfied by establishing that "a series of exposures was a \legal cause' of \[plaintiff's\] injury." Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · June 30, 2014 · in the opinion
Barnes v. Foster Wheeler Corp. (2014)
…Goulds Pump Inc., Ingersoll Rand Company Limited, and Owens Illinois Incorporated alleging that he continually worked with, used, handled and was caused to come in contact with Defendants' asbestos-containing products and the asbestos dust and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · May 13, 2021 · in the opinion
Toy v. Warren Pumps (In re Asbestos, 2021)
…a substantial factor in causing Mr. Toy's injury and death. See McIndoe, 817 F.3d at 1174 (applying maritime law); see also Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal. 4th 953, 968-69 (Cal. 1997)…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · December 18, 2015 · in the opinion
May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2015)
…in the business of selling such a product, and (b) it is expected to and does reach the user or consumer without substantial change in the condition in which it is sold. In Owens-Illinois, Inc…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · August 15, 2014 · in the opinion
Wood v. Crane Co. (2014)
…k/a McCormick Asbestos Co.; Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.; National Service Industries, Inc., f/k/a North Brothers, Inc.; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Rapid-American Corporation; Riley Power, Inc., f/k/a Babcock Borsig, Inc., f/k…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · October 3, 2014 · in the opinion
May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)
…both by Wood and by the out-of-state cases that have followed in its wake, the Mays make a series of miscellaneous arguments. We reject each of them. First, citing Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · January 8, 2015
Quirin v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2015)
…ended before the marriage, but denied it to Georgia-Pacific. A defendant owes no duty to a spouse for loss of consortium if the couple was not married when the asbestos exposure occurred, and insurance-policy…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · July 14, 2014
Smith v. Crane Co. (2014)
…appellate decisions (Monroe and Gillenwater), a defendant owes no duty to a spouse for loss of consortium if the couple was not married when the exposure or injury occurred, and the discovery rule does not change…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · June 26, 2015
Hammell v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2015)
…because of disputed facts. Under maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for, and owes no duty to warn about, asbestos-containing parts it did not manufacture or supply, and a plaintiff must show exposure to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · June 24, 2015
Shearer v. AW Chesterton Company (2015)
…which governed work aboard a dry-docked Navy ship, a manufacturer owes no duty to warn about asbestos products it neither made nor distributed, so a turbine maker is not liable for insulation applied after the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · February 14, 2014
Quirin v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2014)
…where its valves needed asbestos components to function and those parts would be replaced with similar materials, but it owes no such duty for third-party insulation it did not supply. Product Identification; Failure to Warn…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 2017
Poage v. Crane Co. (2017)
…testimony about shared work on the valves, and the maker owes a duty to warn and to design safely where its valves required or specified asbestos gaskets and packing. Missouri's statutory cap on punitive damages…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · August 5, 2021
Wineland v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…factor, with evidence of the amount and duration of exposure. A manufacturer owes a duty to warn about third-party replacement parts only if its product requires the part to function as intended. Causation; Product Identification…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · October 21, 2022 · in the opinion
Pritt v. John Crane, Inc. (2022)
…Vice, Vinson Law, PA, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiffs. Brian J. Schneider, Spotts Fain PC, Richmond, VA, Christopher Owen Massenburg, Manning Gross and Massenburg LLP, New Orleans, LA, Jonathan F. Tabasky, Megan K. Sullivan, Stephanie M. Batchelder…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · February 13, 2017 · in the opinion
Chesher v. 3M Company (2017)
…above, the Conner court relied heavily on the Lindstrom decision in concluding that a manufacturer owes no duty to warn with respect to "asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." See Conner, 842…
-
Court case · New York Court of Appeals · June 28, 2016 · in the opinion
Mtr OF Nyc Asbestos Litig. (2016)
…to enable the manufacturer's product to function as intended" (majority op at 778). I believe this test opens too broad an avenue of potential liability and that, in line with our precedent in this area…