No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

202 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 8 of 11

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 26, 1999

    Howard v. Owens Corning (1999)

    The Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment for Owens Corning on a jury verdict that Howard's asbestos exposure was not a cause of his injury, and rejected the Howards' claim that they were entitled to…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 10, 2023

    Wilgenbusch v. Metalclad Insulation LLC (2023)

    …Owens Corning (Kaylo) and later Fiberboard (Pabco). A jury found Metalclad liable for design defect, failure to warn, and negligent failure to warn. It assigned Metalclad 7 percent of responsibility and 12 percent each to Owens…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 2, 2012

    Nolen v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2012)

    …water treatment chemicals Pacific State Steel Fremont or Hayward 1976-1979; sales engineer/sales representative for water treatment chemicals Owens-Corning Fiberglass Santa Clara 1976-1979; sales engineer/sales representative for water treatment chemicals Chevron Richmond…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion

    Rollin v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2012)

    …and can be held strictly liable for injuries caused by their failure to warn. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1003.) The sophisticated user defense relieves a manufacturer from its usual…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2024 · in the opinion

    Watts v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2024)

    …no evidence of sufficient sustainability to support the claim or defense of the party opposing the motion...." (Howard v. Owens Corning (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 621, 629-630 \[85 Cal.Rptr.2d 386\].) "On appeal…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 26, 2017 · in the opinion

    City of Pasadena v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2017)

    …1966) 241 Cal.App.2d 451, 454 (Collins) \["A cause of action accrues at the moment the party who owns it is entitled to bring and prosecute an action thereon."\].) "Generally, the right to bring and…

  7. Court case · California Supreme Court · January 12, 2012 · in the opinion

    O'neil v. Crane Co. (2012)

    …General Principles (8) "Generally speaking, manufacturers have a duty to warn consumers about the hazards inherent in their products. (Anderson \[v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.\], supra, 53 Cal.3d at p. 1003.) The requirement's purpose…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 16, 1987 · in the opinion

    Hughes v. Western MacArthur Co. (1987)

    …Fire Protection Dist. (1987) 43 Cal.3d 148, 153 \[233 Cal. Rptr. 308, 729 P.2d 743\]; Young v. Libbey-Owens Ford Co. (1985) 168 Cal. App.3d 1037, 1040, fn. 3 \[214 Cal. Rptr. 400\…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 2016 · in the opinion

    Rondon v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2016)

    …is imposed for three types of product defects: manufacturing defects, design defects, and warning defects. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995 \[281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549\] (Anderson).…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 8, 2010 · in the opinion

    Reaser v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)

    …the forum non conveniens motion can be granted. In that regard, Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753 (Hansen) is instructive. Hansen was an asbestos case with 200 named defendants. (Id…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 23, 2010 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. Certainteed Corporation (2010)

    …653.) He could not identify Owens-Corning's "Kaylo" insulation as one of the asbestos products to which he was exposed and relied on the testimony of one witness in an earlier case who had worked…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2016 · in the opinion

    Moran v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation (2016)

    …thermobestos," Owens-Corning's "KAYLO" and Kaiser's "Vee-block." Beginning in 1964, Johns-Manville began placing a warning label on the side of cartons containing its "thermobestos" pipe covering.\[3\] Beginning in 1966, Owens-Corning…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 2002 · in the opinion

    Hackett v. John Crane, Inc. (2002)

    …packing materials, gaskets, and insulation furnished by many other manufacturers, including Garlock, Owens Corning, and Johns-Manville. Lewis began to exhibit symptoms of lung disease in April 1998. Diagnostic tests indicated that Lewis had mesothelioma, an…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 28, 2010 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Certainteed Corporation (2010)

    …trigger strict liability for that product's defect. As already stressed, liability for product defects "is not absolute." (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., supra, 53 Cal.3d at p. 994.) The imposition of liability must…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2012 · in the opinion

    Barker v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2012)

    …defects: Manufacturing defects, design defects, and "\warning defects,' i.e., inadequate warnings or failures to warn."\[4\] (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995 \[281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 25, 2012 · in the opinion

    Flores v. Kmart Corporation (2012)

    …supra, 607 F.3d at pp. 127-128; accord Wright v. Owens Corning (W.D.Pa. 2011) 450 B.R. 541, 544-555.) The parties urge us to choose one of these tests or variations thereof…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    Vanhooser v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2012)

    …difficult to determine when the injury occurs and "\[n\]o temporally discrete event exists that encompasses the defendant's breach and the plaintiff's injury." (Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1977) 16 Cal.4th 520…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 17, 2000 · in the opinion

    Ashdown v. Ameron International Corp. (2000)

    …the date of the decedent's injury as a matter of law. Appellants cite the Supreme Court's opinion in Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520, 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 438…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2010 · in the opinion

    Haver v. BNSF Railway Company (2010)

    …to Lynne because it had no special relationship with her. Recognizing that foreseeability is a crucial factor in determining whether a defendant owes a duty of care, BNSF pointed out that the primary question to be…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 23, 2018 · in the opinion

    Williams v. the Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack OF California (2018)

    …treatment. Hence, any reasonable charges for treatment the injured person has paid or, having incurred, still owes the medical provider are recoverable as economic damages." (Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions, Inc. (2011) 52 Cal.4th 541…