183 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 8 of 10
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 17, 2023 · in the opinion
Crossland v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2023)
…When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 10, 2015 · in the opinion
Lefrak v. American Biltrite (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)
…Grace & Co.-Conn), 216 AD2d 79 \[1st Dept. 1995\]). In addition, issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557, 559-60). Where "\[t\]he deposition testimony of a…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 13, 2023 · in the opinion
King v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2023)
…When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 24, 2016 · in the opinion
The Marley-Wylain Co. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2016)
…and distributors to strict products liability. (O'Neil v. Crane Co. (2012) 53 Cal.4th 335, 347; Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995.) Michigan does not. (Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · September 24, 2013 · in the opinion
Barraford v. T&N Limited (2013)
…2d 305, 310 (D. Me. 2011); see Horne v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 4 F.3d 276, 283 (4th Cir. 1993) ("\[P\]rivity is not the gravamen of the analysis."). Instead, "where the parties in the…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 4, 1999 · in the opinion
Ehret v. Congoleum Corp. (1999)
…its motion for new trial. At the August 22 hearing, the court and counsel discussed Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp: (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520, 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 438, 941 P.2d 71 (Buttram)…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · March 23, 1984 · in the opinion
Adams v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1984)
…is AFFIRMED. \[1\] Evidence introduced at trial indicated that Adams was smoking as many as 15 cigars a day before he quit in 1974. \[2\] The settling defendants were: Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.; Armstrong Cork Co.…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 17, 2007 · in the opinion
Slaughter v. Union Carbide Corp. (2007)
…in Tennessee, there would be personal jurisdiction over all defendants there through the Tennessee Long-Arm Statute. Respondents rely primarily on Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753 (Hansen), to support…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 5, 2016 · in the opinion
Watkins v. Affinia Group (2016)
…from 1957 to 1958, where he was exposed to rolls of asbestos insulation and asbestos pipe covering. Owens Corning Fiberglass sold the insulation to the Babcock facility while Glenn worked there. The insulation, known as "Kaylo…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 18, 2016 · in the opinion
Untermann v. D. Zelinsky & Sons, Inc. (2016)
…Citation.\]" (McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. (2002) 98 Cal.App.4th 1098, 1103; see Rutherford v. Owens-Williams, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 976-977.) Direct evidence of exposure is not required; rather, the plaintiff…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 5, 2013 · in the opinion
Pitman v. Crane Co. (2013)
…exist, the amount in controversy must exceed $75,000, and there must be complete diversity between plaintiffs and defendants. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a); Owen Equip. & Erection Co. v. Kroger, 437 U.S. 365…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 3, 2005 · in the opinion
Benjamin v. Union Carbide Corporation (2005)
…Wilson v. John Crane, Inc., 385 Md. 185, \_\_\_ (2005)(quoting Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md. 500, 506-507 n.2 (1996)). \[5\] The court granted the motion after a hearing held on April…
-
Court case · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · March 20, 1997 · in the opinion
Alliegro v. ACandS, Inc. (1997)
…the appropriate substantial factor standard is that enunciated in a decision handed down by this court after his phase one trial, Claytor v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 662 A.2d 1374 (D.C.1995). In Claytor…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 27, 2015 · in the opinion
Storey v. Morse Diesel (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)
…77 AD3d 425, 426 \[1st Dept 2010\]). In addition, issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557, 559-60). Where "\[t\]he deposition testimony of a litigant is…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Pransky (2002)
…Inc., 283 Md. 296, 328, 389 A.2d 887, 906 (1978) (same); Owens-Corning v. Walatka, 125 Md.App. 313, 342, 725 A.2d 579, 593 (1999) (same). Because Lisa did not handle the joint compound…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 20, 2012 · in the opinion
Konstantin v. 630 Third Ave. Assoc. (2012)
…NY2d 818 \[1999\], cert den sub nom Worthington Corp v. Ronsini, 529 US 1019 \[2000\]); Zalinka v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp, 221 AD2d 830 \[3rd Dept 1995\]; Bigelow v. Acands, Inc, 196 AD2d 436 \[1st Dept…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · July 18, 2007
Bugosh v. Allen Refractories Company (2007)
…and sewer pipe in Pittsburgh. He later worked at the Anchor Hocking glass plant, where he was exposed to asbestos cement used to repair glass-annealing ovens (lehrs), to pipe covering, and to transite mill board…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · April 7, 2011
Wagers v. Sgl Carbon, LLC (2011)
…a premises owner owes an independent contractor's employees a general duty to warn of hidden dangers, but no breach occurs where the contractor already knew the danger. The owner also owes a nondelegable duty for…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 4, 2011
Robertson v. Doug Ashy Building Materials, Inc. (2011)
…at issue, and circumstantial evidence that a manufacturer bought the supplier's asbestos can create a fact question on exposure. A raw-asbestos supplier also owes the general duty of reasonable care. Causation; Product Identification; Expert…
-
Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 20, 2012
Union Carbide Corporation v. Fields (2012)
…the plaintiff's injury; inference, unverified allegations, or settled status alone are not enough. An employer owes no duty for take-home exposure, so it bears no allocable fault. Causation; Product Identification; Expert Testimony; Take-Home…