No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

177 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 8 of 9

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · October 26, 2020 · in the opinion

    Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2020)

    …179, 644 S.E.2d 724 (2007) (adopting the Lohrmann test for actionable exposure in South Carolina); Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 716 (4th Cir. 1995) (applying the Lohrmann test in…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · March 9, 2023 · in the opinion

    Deem v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)

    …with maritime law, is that the plaintiff show "more than a casual or minimum contact with the product" to hold the defendant liable. Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prod., 69 F.3d 712, 716 …

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · November 10, 2016 · in the opinion

    French v. AW Chesterton Company (2016)

    …conduct performed under color of federal office; and (4) defendant raises a colorable federal defense to plaintiff's claim. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3rd Cir. 1998) (citing Mesa v…

  4. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 24, 2009 · in the opinion

    Cashman v. Pacific Scientific Company (2009)

    …is no reasonable inference that he removed and replaced the original asbestos insulation. The estate also points to certain documents obtained during discovery from the Selas Corporation.\[16\] One document refers to Owens-Corning Kaylo 20…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 17, 2009 · in the opinion

    Kirks v. General Electric Company (2009)

    …a colorable federal defense; and (4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2009 · in the opinion

    Wangen v. Gardner Denver, Inc. (2009)

    …other factors. But the same court also cited with approval the Hansen v. Owens\[-Corning Fiberglas Corp.\] (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753, deferring to that court's opinion in the context of asbestos litigation. The…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · December 27, 2022 · in the opinion

    King v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2022)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 25, 2018 · in the opinion

    Kraus v. Alcatel-Lucent (2018)

    …that they do not have any burden to offer evidence demonstrating federal jurisdiction until the plaintiff challenges jurisdiction in a motion to remand. Dart Cherokee Basin Op. Co. v. Owens, 135 S. Ct. 547, 553 (2014)…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion

    Charlevoix v. Caterpillar (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …products, "in the scope of \[the plaintiff's\] entire work history," should be considered in determining whether defendant's conduct was a substantial contributing factor. Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 571N.W.2d530, 533 (Mich…

  10. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 3, 2005 · in the opinion

    Benjamin v. Union Carbide Corporation (2005)

    …Wilson v. John Crane, Inc., 385 Md. 185, \_\_\_ (2005)(quoting Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md. 500, 506-507 n.2 (1996)). \[5\] The court granted the motion after a hearing held on April…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · August 7, 2012 · in the opinion

    Lewis v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (2012)

    …See 28 U.S.C. § 1331(a). If any plaintiff and any defendant share state citizenship, complete diversity would be defeated. Owen Equipment and Erection Co. v. Kroger, 437 U.S. 365 (1978); Grand Union Superm…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 18, 2015 · in the opinion

    Voelker v. John Crane (Matter of Eighth Jud. Dist. Asbestos Litig., 2015)

    …determination. It is noted, that in New York, injury occurs when plaintiff is exposed to asbestos. (see Consorti v Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 86 NY2d 449 (1997); Matter of Eighth Judicial District Asbestos Litig. \[Chrabas\], 273…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · November 9, 2021 · in the opinion

    Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …of such a nature as to raise a reasonable inference that \[s\]he inhaled asbestos fibers that emanated from it.'" Wilson, 807 A.2d at 923 (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 1999 Pa. Super…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)

    …proof, plaintiff cannot overcome Westinghouse's summary judgment motion based on alleged exposure to asbestos in electrical gear at Alabama River Pulp. See generally Sheffield v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 595 So.2d 443, 457 (Ala.

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion

    Faddish v. Buffalo Pumps (2012)

    …Ferayorni v. Hyundai Motor Co., 711 So.2d 1167, 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), following Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 53 Cal.3d 987, 281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549, 558 (1991). Under…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · June 26, 2015

    Hammell v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2015)

    …because of disputed facts. Under maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for, and owes no duty to warn about, asbestos-containing parts it did not manufacture or supply, and a plaintiff must show exposure to…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · June 24, 2015

    Shearer v. AW Chesterton Company (2015)

    …which governed work aboard a dry-docked Navy ship, a manufacturer owes no duty to warn about asbestos products it neither made nor distributed, so a turbine maker is not liable for insulation applied after the…

  18. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 2017

    Poage v. Crane Co. (2017)

    …testimony about shared work on the valves, and the maker owes a duty to warn and to design safely where its valves required or specified asbestos gaskets and packing. Missouri's statutory cap on punitive damages…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · August 5, 2021

    Wineland v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)

    …factor, with evidence of the amount and duration of exposure. A manufacturer owes a duty to warn about third-party replacement parts only if its product requires the part to function as intended. Causation; Product Identification…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · October 21, 2022 · in the opinion

    Pritt v. John Crane, Inc. (2022)

    …Vice, Vinson Law, PA, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiffs. Brian J. Schneider, Spotts Fain PC, Richmond, VA, Christopher Owen Massenburg, Manning Gross and Massenburg LLP, New Orleans, LA, Jonathan F. Tabasky, Megan K. Sullivan, Stephanie M. Batchelder…