495 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 9 of 25
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 30, 2019 · in the opinion
Dugger v. Union Carbide Corporation (2019)
…Weathersby Houff. Warren Pumps, Inc., Cross Claimant, represented by Meggie Hogan, Swanson Martin and Bell, pro hac vice. Ford Motor Company, Inc., ThirdParty Plaintiff, represented by Michelle Noorani, Whiteford Taylor and Preston LLP. Alfa Laval, Inc.…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · February 14, 2018 · in the opinion
Condon v. Advance Thermal Hydronics, Inc. (2018)
…and Northern Pump Business; FORD MOTOR COMPANY; FORT KENT HOLDINGS, INC., f/k/a Dunham Busch, Inc., as successor-in-interest to Iron Fireman Combustion Products; FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORP.; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; GEORGIA PACIFIC LLC…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 30, 2019 · in the opinion
Dugger v. Union Carbide Corporation (2019)
…Weathersby Houff. Warren Pumps, Inc., Cross Claimant, represented by Meggie Hogan, Swanson Martin and Bell, pro hac vice. Ford Motor Company, Inc., ThirdParty Plaintiff, represented by Michelle Noorani, Whiteford Taylor and Preston LLP. Alfa Laval, Inc.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · April 19, 2018 · in the opinion
Jack v. Asbestos Corporation Ltd. (2018)
…Randy J. Aliment, LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP. Ford Motor Company, Defendant, represented by Mark J. Fucile, FUCILE & REISING. Gardner-Denver Inc, Defendant, represented by Claude Bosworth, RIZZO MATTINGLY BOSWORTH PC. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · July 7, 2023 · in the opinion
Williams v. Schneider Electric USA, Inc. (2023)
…The Kentucky Supreme Court granted discretionary review and vacated the decision, as the Court had overruled Ervin Cable in Sheets v. Ford Motor Company, 626 S.W.3d 594 (Ky. 2021).\[2\] We were then ordered…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 28, 2010 · in the opinion
Johnson v. Certainteed Corporation (2010)
…Vandermark held that the lower court erred in granting a nonsuit on the plaintiff's claim that Ford Motor Company (Ford) could not be strictly liable for a product defect simply because it relied on its…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2017 · in the opinion
Johnson v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. (2017)
…identified six specific trucks owned by Bekins during the years of Father's employment: two Ford Motor Company (Ford) bobtail trucks (1965 and 1969 models) and four medium-duty International Harvester Company (International) semitruck tractors (1965…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana · July 14, 2014 · in the opinion
Davidson v. Georgia Pacific LLC (2014)
…for the District of Utah, in two recent cases, Anderson v. Ford Motor Company, 950 F. Supp.2d 1217 (D. Utah 2013) and Smith v. Ford Motor Company, No. 2:08-630, 2013 WL 214378 (D…
-
Court case · Massachusetts Appeals Court · September 20, 2010 · in the opinion
Morin v. AutoZone Northeast, Inc. (2010)
…in the complaint as Pneumo Abex Corporation); Ron's Truck Stop; and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. The judge denied summary judgment as to Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation, and Honeywell International, Inc…
-
Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · February 28, 2024 · in the opinion
Edwards v. Scapa Waycross, Inc. (2024)
…the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania's opinion in Rost v. Ford Motor Company\[2\] and claims the court of appeals improperly approved the use of the cumulative dose theory rejected in Henderson and Lohrmann. We disagree…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · December 30, 1982 · in the opinion
Murphree v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. (1982)
…Supreme Court, with Justice William Fones dissenting, prevented the amendment from becoming effective. The Court held in Ford Motor Company v. Moulton, 511 S.W.2d 690 (Tenn.1974) that under Tennessee vested rights doctrine, based…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2015 · in the opinion
Schwartz v. Abex Corp. (2015)
…494, 709 A.2d 139 (Md. 1998) (involving asbestos-containing replacement brakes used with motor vehicles manufactured by Ford Motor Company). Because the issue is on appeal, the Court has not considered Maryland state law as…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · February 8, 2019 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair, Inc. (2019)
…Jeffrey P. Hubbard, HUBBARD, MITCHELL, WILLIAMS & STRAIN, PLLC & Stacey L. Strain, HUBBARD, MITCHELL, WILLIAMS & STRAIN, PLLC. Ford Motor Company, Defendant, represented by Amber Barlow, KUCHLER, POLK, WEINER, LLC, pro hac vice, Janika D. Polk, KUCHLER POLK…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 24, 2008 · in the opinion
Cunningham v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (2008)
…provide the replacements for such parts, they cannot be held liable for Cunningham's injuries. (See, e.g., Vandermark v. Ford Motor Company, supra, 61 Cal.2d at p. 262; Wiler v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · November 5, 1997 · in the opinion
Ciletti v. Raymark Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 1997)
…and a reasonable person would conclude that the utility of the product did not outweigh the risk inherent in marketing a product designed in that manner." Denny v. Ford Motor Company, 87 N.Y.2d 248…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · October 28, 2010 · in the opinion
King v. Ridenour (2010)
…past 10 years, including Wallace Ridenour. In addition, Waters once represented a party in a lawsuit filed against Ford Motor Company outside of Michigan. Waters, like most law firms today, has a website. The website includes…
-
Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · August 21, 2024 · in the opinion
Jolly v. Fisher Controls International, LLC (2024)
…831 (citations omitted). In Riley, following a motor vehicle accident involving Benjamin Riley and Andrew Marshall Carter II, Riley's estate sued both Carter and the Ford Motor Company. Riley alleged that Carter had failed to…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · October 14, 2009 · in the opinion
Nye v. Bayer Cropscience, Inc. (2009)
…its employees of the dangerous nature of the product was the proximate cause of the accident." Whitehead, 775 S. W. 2d 593, 599 — 600 (citing Ford Motor Company v. Wagoner, 183 Tenn. 392, 192 S.W…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 20, 2017
Altman v. Ford Motor Co. (In re New York City Asbetos Litigation, 2017)
…Benicia Pump Repair Benicia 1950s-1980s; helper in boiler and furnace removal and installation stepfather's boiler and furnace business 1950s; worker at a construction products company 1970s; handyman 1970s and 1980s; union carpenter various construction…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · March 5, 2015
Jones v. 84 Lumber Company (2015)
…four areas of Tennessee law: modified comparative fault, a $750,000 cap on noneconomic damages, allocating fault to nonparties (including bankrupt companies), and the innocent retailer statute. The plaintiffs agreed Tennessee law applied but said it…