No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

235 results for “General Electric”, page 9 of 12

  1. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 28, 2017 · in the opinion

    Roverano v. John Crane, Inc. (2017)

    …asbestos that caused his lung cancer. However, Dr. Frank testified on this general causation factor and concluded that exposure to asbestos can cause lung cancer. Dr. Gelfand also testified that, based on the medical literature and…

  2. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · June 10, 1986 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    …Inc., Rapid American, Uni-Royal, Carolina Asbestos Co., J. Franklin Burke General Asbestos Co., Ruberoid Company, Keaseey Mattison Co., Asten Hill Manufacturing Co. Argued December 17, 1985. Filed June 10, 1986. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. [\60…

  3. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · July 18, 2007 · in the opinion

    Bugosh v. Allen Refractories Company (2007)

    …applicable. ¶ 28 The doctrine of judicial estoppel holds that "\[a\]s a general rule, a party to an action is estopped from assuming a position inconsistent with his or her assertion in a previous action, if…

  4. Court case · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · July 7, 1993 · in the opinion

    Behrendt v. GAF Corp. (1993)

    …fishing, woodworking. Mr. Behrendt's pain symptoms eventually led to a diagnosis of mesothelioma in December 1990. He was taken to the Emergency Room at Community General Osteopathic Hospital, Harrisburg, on December 23, 1990 with a…

  5. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 22, 1991 · in the opinion

    Lilley v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1991)

    …asbestosis sufferers in general and specifically by a person with Mr. Lilley's type of symptoms. Id. at 41-46. Dr. Altschuler offered no testimony regarding Mr. Lilley's psychological profile nor the general psychological characteristics…

  6. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 17, 2015 · in the opinion

    Amato v. Bell & Gossett (2015)

    …of Pittsburgh, 409 Pa. 357, 186 A.2d 399 (1962), which it asserts stands for the general rule that "for the same injury, an injured party may have but one satisfaction." Id. at 402. However, Crane…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (2009)

    …§ 1407(b). Some courts have read this grant of authority to conflict with the general guidance of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 which, in pertinent part, states that "the court by which a subpoena was…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · April 15, 2015 · in the opinion

    Stellar v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2015)

    …Gen. Motors Corp., 170 F.3d 367 (3d Cir.1999). \[7\] Although not unique to this Court, or to asbestos litigation in general, the substance of Plaintiffs' complaint merits discussion. Asbestos litigation in Northampton County, Pennsylvania…

  9. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · April 24, 2014 · in the opinion

    In re Mid-Valley, Inc. (2014)

    …have taken to apportion asbestos liability). What does the above mean with respect to the Motion? In general, it means that the Court will largely defer to the proceedings in the State Court Action provided they…

  10. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 22, 2014 · in the opinion

    Markovsky v. Crown Cork & Seal Co. (2014)

    …Mundet Cork Company? Appellant's Brief at 4-5.\[6\] At the outset, we note: acts passed by the General Assembly are strongly presumed to be constitutional, including the manner in which they were passed. Accordingly…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · November 19, 1984 · in the opinion

    Colombo v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1984)

    13, 68 L.Ed.2d 1 (1981) (federal law shall govern issues arising in negligence actions under LHWCA section 5(b)) with Edmonds v. Compagnie Generale Atlantique, 443 U.S. 256, 272 n. 31, 99 S…

  12. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 24, 2018 · in the opinion

    Jarrett v. Consol. Rail Corp. (2018)

    …Accordingly, Jarrett argues that her claim should have gone before a jury for a determination as to whether lung cancer was a "known risk" and/or whether the release was unenforceable as a general boilerplate release…

  13. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 25, 2005 · in the opinion

    Summers v. Certainteed Corp. (2005)

    …is highly practical. Therefore, this decision is applicable only to asbestos-related cases and not to summary judgment cases in general. ¶ 5 Essentially, plaintiffs ask this Court en banc to overrule the panel decision in Quate…

  14. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · January 25, 1991 · in the opinion

    Moran v. G. & WH Corson, Inc. (1991)

    …with Bob Hinks. Q. About that knowledge? A. A general discussion, a light general thing that I had read about in the paper or, you know, not actually getting into detail. Q. You read about what…

  15. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 15, 2007 · in the opinion

    Bugosh v. Allen Refractories Co. (2007)

    …approach a situation to which the term judicial estoppel is applicable. ¶ 28 The doctrine of judicial estoppel holds that "\[a\]s a general rule, a party to an action is estopped from assuming a position inconsistent…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · April 1, 2020 · in the opinion

    Gorton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)

    …541 N.E.2d 1040 (1989). Therefore, an employer could produce a product both for the general public and for its own use. In that case, the employer is liable to an employee under the dual…

  17. Court case · Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court · May 25, 1972 · in the opinion

    Bambrick v. Asten Hill Mfg. Co. et al. (1972)

    …he meant asbestosis when he said asbestos exposure, as well as exceed our judicial prerogative. The General Assembly has limited recovery to death caused by asbestosis, not asbestos exposure. There is insufficient evidence upon which to…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 20, 2010 · in the opinion

    Gitto v. AW Chesterton Co., Inc. (2010)

    …at 14-15). After the foundation was complete, the shipfitters were on standby in the general area of the ship when new pieces of equipment were installed by other tradesman. Mr. Gitto testified that while the…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 1, 1982 · in the opinion

    Amader v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1982)

    …Trust Co. v. Lumbermans Mutual Casualty Co., 411 F.2d 88, 92-95 (3d Cir. 1969). Cf., Aerojet-General Corporation v. Askew, 511 F.2d 710 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 908, 96 S…

  20. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 23, 2023 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Consolidated Rail Corporation (2023)

    …used for choosing those studies. Appellee's Brief at 20. According to Conrail, Nothing in \[Dr.\] Levin's report suggested that he employed any methodology to opine on general causation, much less a generally accepted one…