189 results for “General Electric”, page 9 of 10
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · March 3, 2020 · in the opinion
Paroni EX rel. Estate OF Paroni v. Alstom SA (2020)
…contacts with New York, Elodie relies most heavily on Alstom's website's statement that its "U.S. Headquarters" are in New York to argue that Alstom is subject to general jurisdiction here. See Pl. Mem…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 3, 2024 · in the opinion
Monlux v. 3M Company (2024)
…1-2, 1-3. Both versions of the complaint contain only general allegations against Foster Wheeler without identifying what specific product allegedly injured Mr. Monlux at Lockheed Shipyard. Foster Wheeler notes that both versions of the…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · September 13, 2011 · in the opinion
State EX rel. Kcp&l Greater Missouri Operations Company v. Cook (2011)
…the statutes. Essentially, it was an express affirmation that the Court in Staples correctly determined the General Assembly's legislative intent. In 1974, the legislature amended the Act to make coverage for occupational diseases mandatory. The…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · December 2, 2004 · in the opinion
In re Combustion Engineering, Inc. (2004)
…Insurance Company, successor to Insurance Company of North America); Pacific Employers Insurance Company; Central National Insurance Company of Omaha (solely with respect to policies issued through its managing general agent, Cravens, Dargan & Company, Pacific Coast), Appellants…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · April 26, 2017 · in the opinion
Bobo v. Tennessee Valley Authority (2017)
…AL, for Plaintiffs-Appellees. James S. Chase, Edward C. Meade, Edwin Warren Small, Tennessee Valley Authority, Office of General Counsel, KNOXVILLE, TN, for Defendant-Appellant. Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, JORDAN, Circuit Judge, and LAMBERTH,\[\\] District…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 23, 2021 · in the opinion
McDaniel v. John Crane, Inc. (2021)
…high known or potential rate of error and whether there are standards controlling the technique's operation," and (4) "\[w\]hether the theory or technique enjoys general acceptance within a relevant scientific community." Kumho Tire Co.…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · June 26, 2007 · in the opinion
Croteau v. Treadwell Corp. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2007)
…301] itself, preclude Con Edison from obtaining indemnification from Treadwell. The subsequent enactment of General Obligations Law § 5-322.1 in 1975 has no retroactive applicability to this situation (see Sapper v St. Vincent's Hosp…
-
Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · January 19, 1994 · in the opinion
Spaur v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)
…neither prosecuted the action against OCF nor has attempted to extract a large penalty for the purpose of raising revenue. We find a clear distinction between the Fund and the general state treasury. See Burke v…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 5, 2014 · in the opinion
Lamberty v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2014)
…percent sure. It was either — he came in on the entry level. It would be either power plant helper or assistant general mechanic. I'm not exactly sure which one. Q So he worked under you?…
-
Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · August 21, 2024 · in the opinion
Jolly v. Fisher Controls International, LLC (2024)
…but paid only to settle the wrongful death claim. Justice James then did exactly what the General Assembly required in subsection 15-38-50(1). He compared the "amount stipulated by the release or the covenant…
-
Court case · Arizona Court of Appeals · April 17, 2012 · in the opinion
Pounders v. Enserch E & C, Inc. (2012)
…1971) ("The fact ... that one of the parties is domiciled ... in a given state will usually carry little weight of itself."); Ferren v. General Motors Corp., 137 N.H. 423, 427, 628 A.2d 265 (1993…
-
Court case · New York Court of Appeals · November 27, 2018 · in the opinion
Juni v. Ford Motor Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…evidence, a connection between defendant Ford Motor Company's products and decedent's exposure to asbestos. I do not address any other issues of general or specific causation reached by the Appellate Division. [\1119] Wilson, J…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · October 24, 2014 · in the opinion
Podedworny v. American Insulated Wire Corp. (2014)
…Hercules Policy was exhausted. The "plan of reorganization is a binding contract between the debtor and the creditors and is subject to the general rules of contract construction and interpretation." In re New Seabury Co. Ltd…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · August 4, 2016 · in the opinion
North v. National Grid Generation (IN the Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2016)
…46 AD3d 268 \[1st Dept 2007\]). The clause in the contract between LILCO and O'Connor (which predates the enactment of General Obligations Law § 5-322.1) provided for indemnification of LILCO by O'Connor for…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 26, 2018 · in the opinion
Botta v. AERCO Int'l (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…1st Dept. 1984\]). Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D. 81, 38…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · August 7, 1991 · in the opinion
Money v. Manville Corp. Asbestos Comp. Fund (1991)
…997 (1987). Just as the General Assembly has recognized that the proximate cause of injuries which are attributable to medical negligence are ordinarily only determinable by expert medical knowledge, this Court has held that expert medical…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 21, 1995 · in the opinion
Jadlowski v. Owens Corning (1995)
…decision to admit this evidence rested in the sound discretion of the trial court, and the judge's decision will not be disturbed unless manifestly unjust. Ratner v. General Motors Corp., 241 N.J. Super. 197…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · March 28, 2019 · in the opinion
Brown v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…and Allis-Chalmers, Con Ed's general contractor. The jury found that Brown had been exposed to asbestos at [\613] Ravenswood, that Con Ed had exercised supervision and control over workers at the powerhouse and had…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · May 9, 2016 · in the opinion
Batchelor v. American Optical Corp. (2016)
…2d 1315, 1329 (N.D.Ala. 2010). Marley and Carroll involved plaintiffs who asserted general disclaimers with respect to all federal claims while, at the same time, pursuing asbestos claims based on plaintiffs' naval service. Marley…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 8, 2013 · in the opinion
Kelly v. Airco Welders Supply (2013)
…it down with us, we would use the Zip. \ \ \ \ Q. Then, in general do you remember what types of applications the Milwaukee valves that you and Mr. Kelly encountered were used for? A. I thought it…