175 results for “General Electric”, page 9 of 9
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 19, 2019 · in the opinion
Peralta v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…to form CAMC. CAMC moved to dismiss for lack of general or specific personal jurisdiction. This Court held that general jurisdiction could not be exercised over CAMC because it was not incorporated nor had its principal…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 7, 2018 · in the opinion
Bell v. American International Industries (2018)
…DENIED. \[1\] Neither party has addressed whether res judicata might apply in this case. "\[A\]s a general matter, a district court should not sua sponte consider an affirmative defense that the defendant has the burden…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 1, 2023 · in the opinion
Chenet v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (2023)
…misplaced. Unlike in Thomas, the trial court judge made only a general statement regarding potential appellate court reversal —the trial court commented that this court had reversed his prior decisions in other unrelated cases. Likewise, the…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 14, 2018 · in the opinion
Rothlein v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…Co., 294 A.D. 2d 900, 741 N.Y.S. 2d 803 \[4th Dept. 2002\], CPLR § 2001 and Status General Development, Inc. v. 501 Broadway Partners, LLC, 163 A.D. 3d 740, 82 N.Y.S…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York · July 31, 2019 · in the opinion
LaFLAIR v. Johnson & Johnson (2019)
…thus requiring the Court to interpret each allegation as against Kolmar individually. While these "general allegation\[s\] would arguably be insufficient under federal pleading standards, the question at this stage is whether Plaintiff\['s\] pleadings are…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · March 27, 2015 · in the opinion
Kaenzig v. Charles B. Chrystal Company, Inc. (2015)
…a result of his exposure to defendant's asbestos-contaminated talc through contact with his father. With regard to general causation, Moline explained that asbestos contains microscopic fibers that are easily inhaled deep into the lungs…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 15, 2016 · in the opinion
DePREE v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2016)
…auto body filler from Grand Auto, and it came in cans bearing the name "Bondo." Although Mr. DePree testified in general terms about his work involving Bondo, with one exception, he was unable to recall the…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 27, 2019 · in the opinion
Alleyne v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2019)
…44 A.D. 2d 804, 355 N.Y.S. 2d 590 \[1st Dept. 1974\] citing to Ramo v. General Motors Corp., 36 A.D. 2d 693, 318 N.Y.S. 2d 951 \[1st Dept. 1971\]). Chanel…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 10, 2018 · in the opinion
Hooper-Lynch v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (2018)
…exposure expressed in environmental years would be greater than 1 f/cc-year." Ms. Sahmel uses the expression as an environmental year to make a direct comparison to ambient exposure in the general U.S. population…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 15, 2012 · in the opinion
Bernard v. Brookfield Props. Corp. (2012)
…this motion followed. DISCUSSION At the outset, Plaintiffs argue that Colgate's reliance almost exclusively on federal law in support of its position is inappropriate. In general, however, the application of the attorney-client and work…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · March 5, 2025 · in the opinion
Gref v. American International Industries (2025)
…party properly objects. Id. However, "\[w\]hen a party makes only conclusory or general objections, or simply reiterates the original arguments, the Court will review the Report strictly for clear error." Molefe v. KLM Royal Dutch…
-
Court case · Montana Workers' Comp. Court · July 1, 2009 · in the opinion
Johnson v. Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation (2009)
…a dryer tender and 6695 hours as a dryer stacker.\[19\] The dryer tender was responsible for the general day-to-day operation of the dryers.\[20\] The dryer stacker was responsible for operating the grading…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Oregon · May 23, 2019 · in the opinion
Levin v. Johnson & Johnson (2019)
…S. Gypsum Co., 285 B.R. 460, 475 (D. Or. 2002). Section 1452(b) has been understood to permit remand based on general fairness and reasonableness considerations. Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 516 U.S. 124…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · July 19, 2022 · in the opinion
Olson v. Johnson & Johnson (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2022)
…exposure to a toxin, that the toxin is capable of causing the particular illness (general causation) and that plaintiff was exposed to sufficient levels of the toxin to cause the illness (specific causation)"\]; Dyer v Amchem…
-
Medical study · Medical research · 2017
Mesothelioid reaction following talc pleurodesis: a case report
This case report described one patient: a 43-year-old woman with a 40 pack-year smoking history who went to an emergency department with right-sided chest pain, fatigue and chronic cough. Repeated right-sided pneumothoraxes (collapsed lung) had been…