No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

224 results for “General Electric”, page 9 of 12

  1. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 23, 2014 · in the opinion

    Robertson v. Doug Ashy Building Materials, Inc. (2014)

    …It then concluded that the only evidence plaintiffs had on causation was Dr. Mark's "general causation" opinion (that exposure to asbestos causes mesothelioma) and that opinion did not "carry the day." On January 29, 2013…

  2. Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · April 19, 2017 · in the opinion

    Kinseth v. WEIL-McLAIN Company (2017)

    …Hellman, P.L.C., Waterloo, for plaintiffs-appellees/cross-appellants. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Richard E. Mull, Assistant Attorney General, for intervenor. Heard by Mullins, P.J., and Bower and McDonald, JJ. BOWER, Judge…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · March 29, 2016 · in the opinion

    Dugas v. 3M Company (2016)

    …basic training, Mr. Dugas was assigned to be an aviation structural mechanic or metal-smith ("AMS"). Id. His job duties were general aircraft maintenance, which included documenting and repairing defects. Id. at 20-21. The Navy…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 3, 2016 · in the opinion

    Davis v. Honeywell International Inc. (2016)

    …to \determine whether, as a matter of logic, the studies and other information cited by experts adequately support the conclusion that the expert's general theory or technique is valid.'" (Sargon, supra, 55 Cal.4th at…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion

    Petitpas v. Ford Motor Company (2017)

    …1103.) Even assuming Dr. Horn is correct as to the cause of mesothelioma in general, plaintiffs had the burden to prove that exposure to asbestos-containing materials at Rossmoor was a substantial factor in contributing to…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · September 25, 2018 · in the opinion

    Doolin v. Ford Motor Company (2018)

    …401 F.3d at 1242. The four criteria are as follows: (1) has the toxic substance in question been demonstrated to cause the type of illness or disease in question (general causation), (2) was the individual…

  7. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · March 2, 2021 · in the opinion

    Neely EX rel. Estate OF Goehring v. Union Carbide Corporation (2021)

    …manufactured, or marketed by Union Carbide were a substantial factor in causing Janet's mesothelioma. Union Carbide does not raise a general causation challenge. As the parties acknowledge, the proper framework for analysis of specific causation…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 11, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …motion is GRANTED with respect to Finkelstein's testimony concerning specific causation. Defendants' motion is DENIED with respect to Finkelstein's testimony concerning general causation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Testimony…

  9. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 1, 1988 · in the opinion

    H & H Plumbing Co. v. Indus. Comm'n (1988)

    …on claimant's testimony regarding his work on the boilers and the appearance of the gaskets. The Commission also relied on the testimony of Norris, H & H's general foreman, that the gaskets contained asbestos. Moreover…

  10. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 5, 2018 · in the opinion

    McKinney v. Hobart Bros. Co. (2018)

    …806 N.E.2d 645 (2004)), and it would be difficult to imagine a more general disclosure than the bare statement that defendant's products caused plaintiff's mesothelioma. Under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 213(g)…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 14, 2007 · in the opinion

    Rosen v. Regents of University of California (2007)

    …and premises liability. They sought both general and punitive damages.\[6\] A first amended complaint was filed in May 2002, adding causes of action against the Regents for making false representations and for loss of consortium…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 17, 2017 · in the opinion

    Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp. (2017)

    …702(c) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, nor do they satisfy the Daubert factors, including "testability," "peer review," and "general acceptance" within the "relevant scientific community," Bresler, 855 F.3d at 195. On the contrary…

  13. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · May 12, 2017 · in the opinion

    Stockton v. Ford Motor Company (2017)

    …908, 911 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1993) (quoting Higgs v. General Motors Corp., 655 F. Supp. 22, 23 (E.D.Tenn.1985)) ("\\[I\]t makes no difference whether the complaint is couched in terms of negligence, strict…

  14. Court case · Florida Supreme Court · October 29, 2015 · in the opinion

    Aubin v. Union Carbide Corporation (2015)

    …jury instructions pertaining to the duty to warn. Aubin requested the trial court to include a general instruction that Union Carbide had the duty to warn the end user, while Union Carbide asserted that it was…

  15. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 26, 2007 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Stephens (2007)

    …a union composed of plasterers, cement masons, and shophands. The study described plasterers' job duties as follows: Plasterers, in general, are responsible for all interior and exterior plastering of drywall, cement, stucco, and stone imitation as…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Ohio · November 17, 1988 · in the opinion

    Adkins v. GAF Corp. (1988)

    …sold by ACL is processed raw asbestos fiber. Asbestos exposure causes asbestosis. This fact was general knowledge in the asbestos industry in the State of Ohio at least after 1945. Not every exposure to asbestos, however…

  17. Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · January 19, 1994 · in the opinion

    Spaur v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)

    …neither prosecuted the action against OCF nor has attempted to extract a large penalty for the purpose of raising revenue. We find a clear distinction between the Fund and the general state treasury. See Burke v…

  18. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · April 26, 2022 · in the opinion

    Nemeth v. Brenntag N. Am. (2022)

    …plaintiff's evidence (see majority op at 344-347). To the extent the majority suggests there was a lack of any evidence of general causation, such a suggestion is unsupportable as there was an abundance of…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2008 · in the opinion

    Garza v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (2008)

    …sufficient contact with the state for the court to assume either general or limited jurisdiction over it. Plaintiffs opposed the motion, asserting among other things that ACL had consented to jurisdiction by making a general appearance…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 7, 2011 · in the opinion

    Kelemen v. John Crane, Inc. (2011)

    …erroneous instruction. . . ."'" (Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 548, 574.) When determining whether an error of instruction and/or instructional omission was prejudicial, the court must evaluate the state of the evidence, the…