No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

178 results for “General Electric”, page 9 of 9

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · April 14, 2023 · in the opinion

    Ollerton v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company (2023)

    …further noting that the Joint Stipulation renders Defendant's Supplement to Notice of Removal moot). I. LEGAL STANDARD In general, "any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United…

  2. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 1, 2010 · in the opinion

    Crane v. Linkus (2010)

    …appellee's motion and entered judgment in the amount requested. Appellant noted an appeal to this Court. General Background Before addressing the causation issue in this case, it may be helpful to place it into context…

  3. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · January 27, 2015 · in the opinion

    Peter v. Sprinkmann Sons Corp. (2015)

    …1994, could act on that claim. Given the purpose of the statute of repose in general and the reason for the damages exception in particular, it would not make sense to interpret "damages" to mean injury. …

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · February 24, 2020 · in the opinion

    Latiolais v. Huntington Ingalls, Incorporated (2020)

    …prosecution." This reading is also unpersuasive. To start, the canon against surplusage yields to context as it expresses courts' "general \reluctan\[ce\] to treat statutory terms as surplusage.'" Bd. of Trs. of Leland Stanford Junior Univ…

  5. Court case · Alabama Court of Civil Appeals · September 24, 1999 · in the opinion

    Wilkerson v. Burlington Northern RR Company (1999)

    …not sufficient to warrant making a diagnosis of pulmonary asbestosis." Dr. Shelton's medical records reflect that Wilkerson had obtained an annual general physical examination from him over the past 10 years, and they indicated Dr…

  6. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 24, 2009 · in the opinion

    Cashman v. Pacific Scientific Company (2009)

    …was presumptively a part of furnace insulation during the 1960s and 1970s. He testified, "My experience and the general understanding is that while there may have been Marigold ceramics, other options available, as there are today…

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 22, 2017 · in the opinion

    Appleton v. Allied Signal (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 23, 2021 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)

    …To ensure reliability, the Court "assess\[es\] the \[expert's\] reasoning or methodology, using as appropriate such criteria as testability, publication in peer reviewed literature, and general acceptance." Id. at 564. III. DISCUSSION Dr. Stockman is…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    Jack v. Dco, LLC (2019)

    …both companies. (Id.) C. The Jury's Verdict The court provided the jury a general verdict form on which the jury was asked whether Plaintiffs proved their strict liability design defect, strict liability failure-to-warn…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 7, 2019 · in the opinion

    Rogers v. Asbestos Corp. Limited (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …2d 1116 (Del. Super. 1986). It is well-established that a plaintiff does not meet his burden of proof by simply placing the product at the general work site. Conway v. A.C.& S, C.A…

  11. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · April 25, 2014 · in the opinion

    Leite v. Crane Co. (2014)

    …of the rules discussed above for resolving such challenges. We recognize that defendants enjoy much broader removal rights under the federal officer removal statute than they do under the general removal statute, 28 U.S.C…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 16, 2007 · in the opinion

    Aguirre v. Long IS. Rail RD. Co. (2007)

    …motion, the LIRR primarily argues that the plaintiffs failed at trial to proffer legally sufficient evidence to support their claims of general and specific causation with respect to their alleged exposure to asbestos and unidentified dusts…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 17, 2018 · in the opinion

    Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2018)

    …and consortium. Id. \[25\] The Green court recognized a narrow exception to the general rule against recovery for premarital injuries in toxic exposure cases, where the injured spouse does not or cannot know of the injury…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 15, 2016 · in the opinion

    DePREE v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2016)

    …auto body filler from Grand Auto, and it came in cans bearing the name "Bondo." Although Mr. DePree testified in general terms about his work involving Bondo, with one exception, he was unable to recall the…

  15. Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · August 8, 2006 · in the opinion

    Duffy v. American Standard, Inc. (2006)

    …who is now deceased, made several general statements indicating that Hormel and Scheid employees "worked together," no testimony was elicited to indicate any specific tasks that the two sets of employees performed together. Duffy testified that…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 17, 2009 · in the opinion

    Clemmer v. Thorpe Insulation Company (2009)

    …s and its trucks were present at the LBNS almost daily. Ay acknowledged that the federal government's General Services Administration (GSA) was the larger supplier; but Thorpe was the predominant supplier among the outside companies…

  17. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 21, 2019 · in the opinion

    Hegger v. Valley Farm Dairy Company (2019)

    …clarity to the interface between occupational diseases and employee remedies provided under the Act, the Missouri General Assembly amended the Act in 2014. These legislative revisions provided targeted compensation for individuals diagnosed with occupational diseases such…

  18. Court case · Missouri Supreme Court · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Hegger v. Valley Farm Dairy Co. (2020)

    …2012) (holding the term "injury" in the Act encompassed occupational diseases). The general assembly amended the workers' compensation law in 2013 to provide the exclusive remedy for occupational diseases caused by toxic exposure in the workplace…