No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

228 results for “General Electric”, page 9 of 12

  1. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 22, 1988 · in the opinion

    Millison v. EI du Pont de Nemours (1988)

    …Ed. 610, 617 (1939); U.S. v. Trotter, 529, F.2d 806 (3d Cir.1976); State v. General Restoration Co., 42 N.J. 366, 375 (1964); State v. Sherwin, 127 N.J. Super. 370 (App.Div…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · June 30, 1992 · in the opinion

    Feldman v. Owens-Illinois (In re Brooklyn Navy Yard Asbestos Litigation, 1992)

    …statute: "There is no justification for rewarding recalcitrant non-settling defendants by permitting them to apply the General Obligations Law offset in a manner that reduces or even obliterates their own liability in cases where plaintiffs…

  3. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · September 18, 2003 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. AC & S., Inc. (2003)

    …the suit, but subsequent to the injuries, the plaintiff executed a general release freeing the railroad from liability for the injuries sustained in the accident in exchange for two hundred and fifty dollars. Callen, 332 U…

  4. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · April 24, 2006 · in the opinion

    Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2006)

    …625 A.2d 1110). B. Applying those general principles of tort liability to the facts of this case, the risk of injury to someone like Eleanor Olivo is one that should have been foreseeable to Exxon…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · July 25, 2013 · in the opinion

    Cabasug v. Crane Co. (2013)

    …level of generality."). Thus, this inquiry "considers whether the general features of the incident could hypothetically have an effect on maritime commerce. It does not require that any impact actually occurred." Christensen v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.…

  6. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 31, 2011 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Aurora Pump Co. (2011)

    …NASH ENGINEERING COMPANY; GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. (sued individually and as successor-in- interest to GARLOCK, INC. and US GASKET CO.); GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION; THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY; GOULDS PUMPS, INC.; HARDIE-TYNES, LLC. (sued…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 29, 2022 · in the opinion

    Hotard v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2022)

    …the evidence suggests that they nevertheless mandated asbestos-containing materials be used in the Vessels' construction without warning the general contractor or any subcontractors about the risks of asbestos or how to safely handle the substance…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · June 11, 1984 · in the opinion

    Hansen v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. (1984)

    …Navy during the Korean conflict and that he was classified as a pipefitter, but that his job was more properly characterized as a general handyman. Most of the pipefitting work was done on shore by others…

  9. Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · March 10, 2003 · in the opinion

    Norfolk & Western R. Co. v. Ayers (2003)

    …B. Salmons argued the cause pro hac vice for the United States as amicus curiae urging reversal. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Olson, Assistant Attorney General McCallum, Deputy Solicitor General Clement, Anthony J…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · December 20, 2023 · in the opinion

    Gillis v. Pbv Inc. (2023)

    …Ct. 1026, 1030, 94 L. Ed. 2d 92 (1987) (quotations and citations omitted). "Personal jurisdiction may be either general or specific." Cossaboon v. Maine Med. Ctr., 600 F.3d 25, 31 (1st Cir. 2010). Specific jurisdiction…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 25, 2018 · in the opinion

    Rivera v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2018)

    …and a retired Assistant Surgeon General of the United States to show Avondale knew no more than the government did about the dangers of asbestos at the time Avondale used asbestos-containing materials in its shipbuilding…

  12. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · October 18, 1995 · in the opinion

    ACandS, Inc. v. Godwin (1995)

    …we have now evidence of the consequences of exposure, but we do not have, in general, accurate measures of the levels of exposure occurring 20 or 30 years ago, which have given rise to these consequences…

  13. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013 · in the opinion

    Ford Motor Co. v. Boomer (2013)

    …more widely used terminology in Virginia as well as the terminology used by the circuit court in this case. \[3\] Although the General Assembly later established a discovery rule for asbestos-related diseases based on diagnosis…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · November 26, 2013 · in the opinion

    Cabasug v. Crane Company (2013)

    …limited; pipefitter journeyman; nuclear inspector, Code 139; General Engineer, Code 365; and Test Engineer and Risk Control. Plaintiffs asserts that he was exposed to asbestos up until 1986 when he was promoted to an office job…

  15. Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · June 1, 2018 · in the opinion

    Kinseth v. Weil-McLain (2018)

    …Waterloo, for appellees. [\62] Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Richard E. Mull, Assistant Attorney General, for intervenor-appellee. [\61] CADY, Chief Justice. In this case, we are called upon to review numerous issues that arose…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · January 2, 2013 · in the opinion

    Church v. Dana Kepner Company, Inc. (2013)

    …standing to file motions to quash the challenged subpoenas. The general rule is that a party has no standing to quash a subpoena served upon a third party, except as to claims of privilege or upon…

  17. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · April 27, 1989 · in the opinion

    Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp. (1989)

    …of Trial Lawyers of America; Richard H. Robblee on behalf of United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices, amici curiae for appellants. [\638] Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, Michael E. Tardif, Senior Assistant, and Michael Madden, Assistant…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 13, 1996 · in the opinion

    Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996)

    …is one of the four plaintiffs in the wrongful death action of Mary Hansen. [\761] (5) "The general rule is that \an appeal reviews the correctness of a judgment as of the time of its rendition…

  19. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · April 3, 2020 · in the opinion

    Little v. the Budd Company, Inc. (2020)

    …2002). This is true whether the newly raised argument is "a bald-faced new issue or a new theory on appeal that falls under the same general category as an argument presented at trial." Id. (quotations…

  20. Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · July 24, 2024 · in the opinion

    Covil Corporation EX rel. Protopapas v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company (2024)

    …recognition of the role notice provisions play in insurance contracts," and stating, "Had the General Assembly intended to categorically prohibit the enforcement of notice clauses in all policies, it would have done so." 427 S.C…