No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

202 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 9 of 11

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 24, 2013 · in the opinion

    Keeney v. AW Chesterton Company (2013)

    …190 Cal.App.4th at p. 33.) Appellants rely on Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461 (Sparks) and Stewart to argue that John Crane did not bear its burden of providing…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 20, 2023 · in the opinion

    Ochoa v. Spx Cooling Technologies, Inc. (2023)

    …beginning in the 1960's and continuing through the 2000's. The louvers were made of galvanized steel until the 1980's and of fiberglass after that. BAC never manufactured cooling towers with louvers containing asbestos…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 4, 2019 · in the opinion

    Linsowe v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2019)

    …To be considered a proximate cause of an injury, the acts of the defendant must have been a \substantial factor' in contributing to the injury. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 969…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · March 17, 2014 · in the opinion

    Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)

    …of these arguments in turn. I. Causation Plaintiff's claims require proof that Defendant Metalclad caused or contributed to Donald Willis's exposure to asbestos. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953, 975 (1997) (…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 7, 2011 · in the opinion

    Kelemen v. John Crane, Inc. (2011)

    …defective designs of the other companies' products were legal causes of the plaintiffs' injuries; and the percentage of legal cause attributable to the other companies." (Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion

    Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)

    …285). A. Threshold Exposure Plaintiff's claims require proof that Defendant caused or contributed to Donald Willis's exposure to asbestos. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953, 975 (1997) ("\[P\]laintiffs \[bear\] the…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 15, 2010 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2010)

    …and administrative powers, as well as inherent power to control litigation before them. \[Citation.\]" (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 967)." When the plaintiff has engaged in misconduct during the course of…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 31, 2014 · in the opinion

    Kent v. Warren Pumps, LLC (2014)

    …the defendant (cause-in-fact) and that there is a reasonable medical probability that such exposure was a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff's injury. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · April 17, 2014 · in the opinion

    Sclafani v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2014)

    …whether Sclafani's exposure to defendants' products "was, in reasonable medical probability, a substantial factor in causing or contributing to his risk of developing cancer." Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953, 957-58…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 8, 2011 · in the opinion

    Saffold v. Bondex International, Inc. (2011)

    …before damages can be allotted to it." (Wilson v. Ritto (2003) 105 Cal.App.4th 361, 369; Sparks v Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 478 \[defendant manufacturer of asbestos-containing product "undisputedly…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 18, 2016 · in the opinion

    Untermann v. D. Zelinsky & Sons, Inc. (2016)

    …Citation.\]" (McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. (2002) 98 Cal.App.4th 1098, 1103; see Rutherford v. Owens-Williams, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 976-977.) Direct evidence of exposure is not required; rather, the plaintiff…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 10, 2018 · in the opinion

    Hake v. Allied Fluid Products Corp. (2018)

    …was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 17, 2010 · in the opinion

    Smith v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2010)

    …At the most fundamental level, there is scientific uncertainty regarding the biological mechanisms by which inhalation of certain microscopic fibers of asbestos leads to lung cancer and mesothelioma." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · July 11, 2022 · in the opinion

    Shelton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)

    …a showing that plaintiff's "particular asbestos disease is cumulative in nature" which can be satisfied by establishing that "a series of exposures was a \legal cause' of \[plaintiff's\] injury." Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 6, 2020 · in the opinion

    Barr v. Parker-Hannifin Corp. (2020)

    …no evidence that Kleinberg was ever exposed to asbestos or that he brought asbestos home on his clothing. Without evidence of exposure there is no causation. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2021 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)

    …that the California Supreme Court has not yet determined whether an "every exposure" theory of liability is consistent with the substantial factor test that applies in asbestos cases. See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Hahn v. New York Air Brake LLC (2022)

    …cause of action against a manufacturer for asbestos-related latent injuries, a plaintiff must "establish some threshold exposure to the defendant's defective asbestos-containing products." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 4, 2012 · in the opinion

    Bettencourt v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2012)

    …context of products liability actions, the plaintiff must prove that the defective products supplied by the defendant were a substantial factor in bringing about his or her injury." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 25, 2014 · in the opinion

    Lovelace v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2014)

    …tortfeasors, we "resolve all conflicts in the evidence in favor of respondent, and indulge all legitimate and reasonable inferences in support of the judgment." (Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 471…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · May 13, 2021 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Warren Pumps (In re Asbestos, 2021)

    …a substantial factor in causing Mr. Toy's injury and death. See McIndoe, 817 F.3d at 1174 (applying maritime law); see also Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal. 4th 953, 968-69 (Cal. 1997)…