9 results for “Ford Motor Company”
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 15, 2007
Honer v. Ford Motor Company (2007)
The Court of Appeal reversed the summary judgments for Ford Motor Company and Merck & Co. and remanded with directions to deny both motions, so plaintiff Eileen Honer prevailed on appeal. Under Code of Civil Procedure section…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2014 · in the opinion
Beckering v. Shell Oil Co. (2014)
…by a family member who laundered asbestos-contaminated work clothes. In Campbell, the plaintiff filed a premises liability action against Ford Motor Company, alleging she contracted mesothelioma as a result of her secondary exposure to asbestos…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 2, 2017 · in the opinion
Beckering v. Shell Oil Company (2017)
…she laundered. In our prior decision in this matter (Beckering v. Shell Oil Company (Nov. 21, 2014, B256407) \[nonpub. opn.\] (Beckering I)), guided by Campbell v. Ford Motor Co. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 15 (Campbell)…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 24, 2021 · in the opinion
Sabetian v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc. (2021)
…it is an appropriate one for the forum to apply to the case before it"'"\].) We review the choice of law question de novo. (Scott v. Ford Motor Co. (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 1492, 1503…
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · February 18, 2010 · in the opinion
McCann v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2010)
…of Brennan, J.); see also Turcott v. Ford Motor Co. (1st Cir. 1974) 494 F.2d 173, 173-174.) \[14\] Because we conclude that under California's choice-of-law principles the law of Oklahoma should…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 6, 2021 · in the opinion
Khosravan v. Chevron Corporation (2021)
…offer, the judgment constitutes prima facie evidence showing the offer was reasonable and the offeror is eligible for costs as specified in section 998."'" (Adams v. Ford Motor Co. (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 1475, 1484…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 17, 2016 · in the opinion
Kordestani v. ExxonMOBIL Oil Corporation (2016)
…408, 421 \[generally, state has no legitimate interest in imposing punitive damages for out-of-state conduct\]; Aguirre Cruz v. Ford Motor Co. (W.D. Tenn. 2006) 435 F.Supp.2d 701, 705-706 \[collecting cases…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2010 · in the opinion
Collins v. Plant Insulation Company (2010)
…is essentially an immunity from suit, or whether it is based on a predicate determination the conduct in question is not wrongful under the law. Subsequent cases illustrate this distinction. In Ford v. Polaris Industries, Inc…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 24, 2013 · in the opinion
Keeney v. AW Chesterton Company (2013)
… thus, it must be claimed and may be waived \[citation\]."\]; People v. Ford (1988) 45 Cal.3d 431, 439 \["The privilege against self-incrimination is, of course, personal and may be asserted only by the holder…