No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

16 results for “Ford Motor Company”

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 8, 2010

    Reaser v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)

    Robert Reaser served in the Navy from 1951 to 1971, working as a pipefitter and welder on Navy vessels, including time in San Diego and Long Beach. He later lived in Florida and worked in construction and on automobiles. He was diagnosed with…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 24, 2008 · in the opinion

    Cunningham v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (2008)

    …provide the replacements for such parts, they cannot be held liable for Cunningham's injuries. (See, e.g., Vandermark v. Ford Motor Company, supra, 61 Cal.2d at p. 262; Wiler v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2021 · in the opinion

    Pizarro v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company (2021)

    …formulated. These inferences cannot be based merely on speculation, but they may be established by circumstantial evidence, in accordance with ordinary standards of proof. Romo v. Ford Motor Co., 99 Cal.App. 4th 1115, 1141 (2002)…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 13, 1996 · in the opinion

    Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996)

    …in light of the evidence before it. (Ford Motor Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America (1995) 35 Cal. App.4th 604, 610 \[41 Cal. Rptr.2d 342\] (Ford).) Therefore, OC bore the burden of proving…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    Merrill v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2009)

    …which makes them better able to insure that the component is suitable for their specific applications. (Springmeyer v. Ford Motor Co. (1998) 60 Cal.App.4th 1541, 1554 \[71 Cal.Rptr.2d 190\].) Liability of a…

  6. Court case · California Supreme Court · January 12, 2012 · in the opinion

    O'neil v. Crane Co. (2012)

    …plaintiffs' assertion on appeal, the case had not been tried or submitted to the jury on the theory that Ford had a duty to warn about hazards in replacement brakes and clutches. (Ford Motor v. Wood…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion

    Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)

    …but they may be established by circumstantial evidence, in accordance with ordinary standards of proof. Romo v. Ford Motor Co., 99 Cal.App.4th 1115, 1141 (2002) ("It is difficult to imagine how corporate malice could…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 18, 2009 · in the opinion

    O'neil v. Crane Co. (2009)

    …or raw material and therefore are in a better position to guarantee that the component or raw material is suitable for their particular applications." \[Citations.\]' (Springmeyer v. Ford Motor Co. \[(1998)\] 60 Cal.App.4th 1541…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · July 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)

    Ford Motor Co., 99 Cal.App.4th 1115, 1141, 122 Cal.Rptr.2d 139 (2002) ("It is difficult to imagine how corporate malice could be shown in the case of a large corporation except by piecing…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 30, 2004 · in the opinion

    Cadlo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2004)

    …776, 59 Cal.Rptr.2d 322.) Because Owens-Illinois was not "an integral part of the overall producing and marketing enterprise" of OCF's Kaylo (Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256, 262…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 9, 2009 · in the opinion

    Oxford v. Foster Wheeler LLC (2009)

    …instructions." (Hasson v. Ford Motor Co. (1977) 19 Cal.3d 530, 540 \[138 Cal.Rptr. 705, 564 P.2d 857\] (Hasson), overruled in part on other grounds in Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2013 · in the opinion

    Pfeifer v. John Crane, Inc. (2013)

    …of governmental safety regulations does not bar an award of punitive damages for egregious misconduct that they are ineffective in preventing. (Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co. (1981) 119 Cal.App.3d 757, 810 \[174 Cal.Rptr…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2021 · in the opinion

    Phipps v. Copeland Corporation LLC (2021)

    …(Cf. Buell-Wilson v. Ford Motor Co. (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 525, 553 \[jury's award of 13 times the amount counsel for plaintiffs requested in noneconomic damages and three times the amount requested for…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 27, 2013 · in the opinion

    Jones v. John Crane, Inc. (2013)

    University Ford (1989) 207 Cal.App.3d 1080, 1086-1087.) Judge Real granted Crane's motion to dismiss based on his examination of the allegations of the complaint and determination that the complaint did not state…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 24, 2013 · in the opinion

    Keeney v. AW Chesterton Company (2013)

    … thus, it must be claimed and may be waived \[citation\]."\]; People v. Ford (1988) 45 Cal.3d 431, 439 \["The privilege against self-incrimination is, of course, personal and may be asserted only by the holder…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · September 27, 2023 · in the opinion

    Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)

    …in the product's use that were known to the supplier but not to the government. Boyle, 487 U.S. at 512; Ford v. Foster Wheeler USA Corp., No. 15-cv-05426-JSW, 2016 WL 551234…