10 results for “Ford Motor Company”
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · June 20, 2018 · in the opinion
Bechtel Corporation v. Batchelor (2018)
…in this case. The complaint sued twenty-six defendants including, for example, Banner Supply Company, Bennett Auto Supply, Ford Motor Company, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, General Electric Company, Genuine Parts Company, Gould Pumps, Inc., Honeywell International…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · December 27, 2017 · in the opinion
Bechtel Corporation v. Batchelor (2017)
…in this case. The complaint sued twenty-six defendants including, for example, Banner Supply Company, Bennett Auto Supply, Ford Motor Company, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, General Electric Company, Genuine Parts Company, Gould Pumps, Inc., Honeywell International…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · August 22, 2017 · in the opinion
Doolin v. American Optical Corporation (2017)
…PL, Melanie E. Chung-Tims, Bice Cole Law Firm, PL & Susan J. Cole, Bice Cole Law Firm, PL. Ford Motor Company, Defendant, represented by Alina Alonso Rodriguez, Bowman and Brooke, LLP, Andrew Scott Freedman, Cole, Scott…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · March 29, 2016 · in the opinion
Dugas v. 3M Company (2016)
…of products liability" it is unsettled whether the consumer-expectation test, risk-utility test or both should be applied in evaluating an alleged defect. Force v. Ford Motor Co., 879 So. 2d 103, 106-07 (Fla…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion
Faddish v. Buffalo Pumps (2012)
…distribution is that " \[t\]hey are an integral part of the overall producing and marketing enterprise that should bear the cost of injuries resulting from defective products." Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co., 61 Cal.2d 256…
-
Court case · Florida Supreme Court · October 15, 2018 · in the opinion
DeLisle v. Crane Co. (2018)
…exposed to asbestos-containing products from the following nonparty defendants: Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC; A.W. Chesterton Co.; Ford Motor Co.; Honeywell International, Inc., f/k/a Allied Signal, as successor in interest to Allied Corp.…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · November 9, 2016 · in the opinion
Crane Co. v. DeLisle (2016)
…exposed to asbestos-containing products from the following nonparty defendants: Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC; A.W. Chesterton Co.; Ford Motor Co.; Honeywell International, Inc., f/k/a Allied Signal, as successor in interest to Allied Corp.…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · May 20, 1992 · in the opinion
Baione v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1992)
…1976). When a set of facts will support both a theory of common law negligence and strict liability, a plaintiff is entitled to proceed on either theory or both. Ford Motor Co. v. Hill, 404 So…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · July 10, 2013 · in the opinion
Flomenhoft v. Georgia-Pacific LLC (2013)
…summary judgment in favor of the defendants on a loss of consortium claim in an asbestos matter with nearly identical facts to the instant case. See Stevens v. Ford Motor Corp., 107 So. 3d 416 (Fla…
-
Court case · Florida Supreme Court · March 17, 1988 · in the opinion
Celotex Corp. v. Meehan (1988)
…the theoretical underpinning of our own discovery rule. As this Court stated thirty years ago in Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. Ford: Generally, in actions for personal injuries resulting from the wrongful act or negligence…