11 results for “Ford Motor Company”
-
Court case · Michigan Supreme Court · July 25, 2007
In re Certified Question From the Fourteenth District Court OF Appeals OF Texas (2007)
…appeals court in the negative, holding that Ford owed no duty to Carolyn Miller, which favored Ford and went against the Miller plaintiffs' $9.5 million Texas verdict theory. Under Michigan law, a duty depends on…
-
Court case · Michigan Court of Appeals · January 11, 2007
Chapin v. A & L Parts, Inc. (2007)
…Ford, General Motors and Honeywell lost their challenge to the Chapins' expert evidence (one judge dissented). A trial court acting as gatekeeper under MRE 702 and MCL 600.2955(1) need not resolve genuine scientific disputes…
-
Court case · Michigan Court of Appeals · January 13, 1998
Beaudrie v. Anchor Packing Co. (1998)
…exposure during his employment. The husbands had already received workers' compensation benefits from their employers (Detroit Edison, Ford and Johnson Controls), and a state dust disease fund had reimbursed part of those benefits. The employers and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · April 25, 1989 · in the opinion
Anjeski v. Keene Bldg. & Development Co. (1989)
…to a directed verdict because with the former the evidence has yet to be fully developed. See Pierce v. Ford Motor Company, 190 F.2d 910 (CA 4 1951); but see 10 Federal Practice and Procedure…
-
Exposure sites · Michigan
Michigan Asbestos Exposure Sites: Worksites, Industries, and Trust Coverage
…Insulators, pipefitters, boilermakers, and the contract crews who worked turnarounds carried the heaviest exposure. Marathon Oil Detroit refinery DearbornDearborn is Ford Motor Company's home, and its River Rouge complex made steel, glass, and engines and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · January 14, 1987 · in the opinion
Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1987)
…defendants should be \jointly and severally' liable." (Plaintiff's Complaint at pp. 7-8). A case decided in the Michigan Court of Appeals subsequent to Abel is Cousineau v. Ford Motor Company, 140 Mich.App. 19…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · May 12, 1987 · in the opinion
Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1987)
…by demonstrating defendants' concerted activity, and proximate cause, by demonstrating that defendants' conduct "was so significant and important a cause that \[defendants\] should be legally responsible." Cousineau v. Ford Motor Company, 140 Mich.App. 19, 35…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · October 28, 2010 · in the opinion
King v. Ridenour (2010)
…past 10 years, including Wallace Ridenour. In addition, Waters once represented a party in a lawsuit filed against Ford Motor Company outside of Michigan. Waters, like most law firms today, has a website. The website includes…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · February 17, 1987 · in the opinion
Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1987)
…and alternative liability in Marshall v. Celotex, 651 F.Supp. 389 (E.D.Mich.1987). \[2\] Cousineau v. Ford Motor Co., 140 Mich.App. 19, 33, 363 N.W.2d 721 (1985) ("\[P\]laintiff is entitled…
-
State law · Michigan
Michigan Mesothelioma Lawyer: Asbestos Claims, Deadlines & Compensation
…471 Mich. 45 (Mich. 2004) — owners' and general contractors' duty to contractors' employees: retained control and common work area. In re Certified Question (Miller v. Ford Motor Co.), 479 Mich. 498, 740 N.W.2d 206…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · August 18, 1988 · in the opinion
Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1988)
…Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co., 418 Mich. 311, 343 N.W.2d 164 (1984), and Cousineau v. Ford Motor Co., 140 Mich.App. 19, 363 N.W.2d 721 (1985), cert. denied sub nom. Firestone Tire…