8 results for “Ford Motor Company”
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · April 9, 2020 · in the opinion
Nemeth v. Brenntag N. Am. (2020)
…the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to establish that defendant Ford Motor Company's conduct was a proximate cause of the decedent's injuries pursuant to the standards set forth in \[Parker\] and…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · June 2, 2022 · in the opinion
English v. Avon Prods., Inc. (2022)
…Shulton pursuant to CPLR 302(a)(1), which applies by its terms, and that the exercise of jurisdiction over Shulton is also compatible with due process (see Ford Motor Co. v Montana Eighth Judicial Dist. Court…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 19, 2018 · in the opinion
Shulman v. Brenntag N. AM., Inc. (2018)
…of fact exist as to whether JJBP used by Ms. Shulman was contaminated with asbestos and defective, or unsuited for its purpose (See Denny v. Ford Motor Co., 87 N.Y. 2d 248, 662 N.E…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 13, 2018 · in the opinion
Garrido v. Johnson & Johnson (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…of fact exist as to whether JJBP used by Mrs. Garrido was contaminated with asbestos and defective, or unsuited for its purpose (See Denny v. Ford Motor Co., 87 N.Y. 2d 248, 662 N.E…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 14, 2018 · in the opinion
Rothlein v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…fact exist as to whether the JBP used by Mr. Rothlein was contaminated with asbestos and defective, or unsuited for its purpose (See Denny v. Ford Motor Co., 87 N.Y. 2d 248, 662 N.E…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 28, 2019 · in the opinion
Olson v. Brenntag N. AM. Inc. (2019)
…414 F Supp 255, 264-265 \[ED Pa 1976\]; Bennett v Greeley Gas Co., 969 P2d 754, 761 \[Colo App 1998\]; Byers v Santiam Ford, Inc., 281 Or 411, 416, 574 P2d 1122, 1124-1125 \[1978…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · February 26, 2019 · in the opinion
Shanahan v. Kolmar Laboratories, Inc. (2019)
…as a successor-in-interest to Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc., Defendants, represented by Daniel Robert Kuszmerski, Barrett, Lazar & Lincoln, LLC. Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, Imerys Talc America, Inc., individually, Imerys USA, Inc. & Imerys Talc Vermont, Inc.…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 11, 2020 · in the opinion
Olson v. Brenntag N. Am., Inc. (2020)
…No. 829 at 125.) But that calculation presumes that the two defendant companies will each pay the full amount of the $25 million compensatory award, which is logically impossible. (See Grabinski v Blue Springs Ford Sales…