No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

19 results for “Ford Motor Company”

  1. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · November 22, 2016

    Rost v. Ford Motor Co. (2016)

    …affirmed the judgment for the Rost estates against Ford Motor Company, holding that the causation testimony was proper and that, although consolidation with two other cases was error, Ford showed no prejudice. An expert may tell…

  2. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 8, 2014 · in the opinion

    Krauss v. Trane US Inc. (2014)

    …Moore Paint Company Inc.; Borden Chemical Inc., f/k/a Borden Chemical Company and n/k/a Hexio Specialty Chemicals Inc., Prentice Hall Corporation; Certain-Teed Corporation f/k/a Certainteed Products Corporation; Ford Motor Company…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · November 9, 2021 · in the opinion

    Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …INC., AND ROCKWELL MANUFACTURING COMPANY; FLOWSERVE US INC., SUCCESSOR TO VALTEK INTERNATIONAL; FLSMIDTH DORR-OLIVER, INC., AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY; FLSMIDTH, INC., FMC CORPORATION, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER LLC…

  4. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 28, 2017 · in the opinion

    Roverano v. John Crane, Inc. (2017)

    …cases, "Pennsylvania law requires that a plaintiff prove two elements: "that the product was defective, and that the defect was the substantial factor in causing the injury." Rost v. Ford Motor Company, 637 Pa. 625, 151…

  5. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 5, 2013 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Airco Welders Supply (2013)

    …ENGINEERING, FORD MOTOR CO., FOSECO, INC., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION, GARLOCK, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GENERAL MOTORS CORP., GEORGE V. HAMILTON, INC., GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, GOULD PUMPS, INC., GREEN, TWEED & COMAPNY, INC., HAJOCA PLUMBING SUPPLY COMPANY, HARNISCHFEGER…

  6. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 19, 2008 · in the opinion

    Weible v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2008)

    …KimberlyClark Corp., Walter B. Gallagher Co., Atco, Borg-Warner Corp., Columbia Boiler Co., Chrysler Corp., Ford Motor Co., General Motors Corp., Ingersoll Rand, John Crane, Inc., Maremont Corp., Pa Brake Bonding, Pneumo Abex Corp., United Gilsonite…

  7. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 24, 2020 · in the opinion

    Schrader v. Ameron International Corporation (2020)

    …Ford Motor Co., 160 A.3d 1135 (Del. 2017) (unpublished disposition at 2017 WL 1422626 [\3]). In Walls, the decedent was exposed to asbestos from, among other sources, brake changes performed on Ford vehicles in the…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · January 25, 2012 · in the opinion

    Rabovsky v. Goulds Pumps (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (NO. VI), 2012)

    …602 F.3d 152, 172 (3d Cir. April 7, 2010) (quoting Pineda v. Ford Motor Co., 502 F.3d 237, 243-44 (3d Cir. 2008)). As is the case with regard to the Federal Rules of…

  9. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 5, 2014 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Airco Welders Supply (2014)

    …Engineering, Ford Motor Co., Foseco, Inc., Foster Wheeler Corporation, Garlock, Inc., General Electric Company, General Motors Corp., George V. Hamilton, Inc., Georgia- Pacific Corporation, Gould Pumps, Inc., Green, Tweed & Company, Inc., Hajoca Plumbing Supply Company, Harnischfeger…

  10. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · November 18, 2009 · in the opinion

    Estate of Hicks v. Dana Companies, LLC (2009)

    …design choice, and not on the attributes of the product itself." Id. at 342, 528 A.2d at 594 (citing Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 102 Wash.2d 208, 683 P.2d 1097 (1984)). Accordingly, the…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · January 7, 2022 · in the opinion

    Data v. Joy Global Underground Mining (2022)

    …where they have unquestionably suffered harm on account of a disease having a long latency period and must prove specific causation under prevailing Pennsylvania law which may be insurmountable." Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 637 Pa…

  12. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Roverano v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)

    …actual, product-specific causation in many asbestos cases, the courts have come to accept abstract assessments of increased risk as proxies for traditional substantial-factor causation. See Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 637 Pa. 625, 668…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · October 1, 2010 · in the opinion

    Peter & Elpis Constantinides v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2010)

    …Argument, doc. no. 141, March 2, 2010 at 93). Mr. Constantinides testified that he occasionally repaired pumps and motors by removing and replacing gaskets and bearings. (Pl. Video Dep., doc. no. 125-2, 56-59). Mr…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · October 8, 2010 · in the opinion

    Peter & Elpis Constantinides v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2010)

    …Argument, doc. no. 141, March 2, 2010 at 93). Mr. Constantinides testified that he occasionally repaired pumps and motors by removing and replacing gaskets and bearings. (Pl. Video Dep., doc. no. 125-2, 56-59). Mr…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · October 22, 2010 · in the opinion

    Faddish v. CBS Corporation (2010)

    at 599; see also Ford v. International Harvester Co., 430 So. 2d 912 (Fl. Dist. App. Ct. 1983)(holding that whether a component manufacturer is liable turns on trade usage and custom, relative expertise of the…

  16. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 4, 2023 · in the opinion

    Mullen v. American Circuit Breaker Corporation (2023)

    …disease by the product of each particular defendant. Vanaman, \[966 A.2d\] at 607. See also Rost v. Ford Company, 151 A.3d 1032 (Pa. 2016) (emphasizing that "frequent, regular, and proximate" test in this context…

  17. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 24, 2014 · in the opinion

    Groover v. CBS Corporation (2014)

    …ELECTRIC COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER, CONOCO PHILLIPS COMPANY, CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., BP AMERICA, INC., ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., ARCO CHEMICAL. No. 680 EDA 2013. Filed April 24, 2014. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · September 30, 2010 · in the opinion

    Peter & Elpis Constantinides v. CBS Corporation (2010)

    …into the design." Id. The court emphasized that Kohler produced a "generic" engine that had many potential uses and incorporations. Id. at 599; see also Ford v. International Harvester Co., 430 So. 2d 912 (Fl. Dist…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · October 8, 2010 · in the opinion

    Peter & Elpis Constantinides v. CBS Corporation (2010)

    …into the design." Id. The court emphasized that Kohler produced a "generic" engine that had many potential uses and incorporations. Id. at 599; see also Ford v. International Harvester Co., 430 So. 2d 912 (Fl. Dist…