No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

9 results for “Ford Motor Company”

  1. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · May 12, 2017

    Stockton v. Ford Motor Company (2017)

    The Court of Appeals vacated the $3.4 million judgment for Joyce and Ronnie Stockton against Ford Motor Company and remanded, because the jury instructions and verdict form omitted required questions on whether the product was…

  2. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · March 13, 2008 · in the opinion

    Woody v. AW Chesterton Company (2008)

    …are A.W. Chesterton Company; Advance Auto Parts, Inc.; Bayer CropScience, Inc.; Borg Warner Morse TEC, Inc.; Breeding Insulation Company, Inc.; Breeding Insulation Company, Chattanooga, Inc.; CBS Corporation; CertainTeed Corporation; Crane Company; Ford Motor Company; Foster…

  3. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion

    Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2019)

    …J., dissenting). In some cases, it has proven difficult to apply. See, e.g., Stockton v. Ford Motor Company, No. W2016-01175-COA-R3-CV, 2017 WL 2021760, at [\12]-15 (Tenn. Ct. App., filed May…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · December 7, 1983 · in the opinion

    Clay v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1983)

    …Supreme Court, with Justice William Fones dissenting, prevented the amendment from becoming effective. The Court held in Ford Motor Company v. Moulton, 511 S.W.2d 690 (Tenn.1974) that under Tennessee vested rights doctrine, based…

  5. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · October 14, 2009 · in the opinion

    Nye v. Bayer Cropscience, Inc. (2009)

    …its employees of the dangerous nature of the product was the proximate cause of the accident." Whitehead, 775 S. W. 2d 593, 599 — 600 (citing Ford Motor Company v. Wagoner, 183 Tenn. 392, 192 S.W…

  6. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · June 7, 2011 · in the opinion

    Nye v. Bayer Cropscience, Inc. (2011)

    …S.W.3d 429, 452-53 (Tenn.Ct.App.2000); Harden v. Danek Med., Inc., 985 S.W.2d 449, 451 (Tenn.Ct.App.1998). North Brothers, relying on Ford Motor Co. v. Wagoner, 183 Tenn.

  7. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · July 1, 2015 · in the opinion

    Payne v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2015)

    …thirteenth juror. See Meals ex rel. Meals v. Ford Motor Co., 417 S.W.3d 414, 420 (Tenn.2013) ("No verdict is valid unless approved by the trial judge acting as the thirteenth juror."). When a…

  8. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · December 10, 2015 · in the opinion

    Segroves v. Union Carbide (2015)

    …Woods, 777 S.W.2d 347, 349 (Tenn. 1989)). It is a "rule of rest," Moulton v. Ford Motor Co., 533 S.W.2d 295, 296 (Tenn. 1976), and it promotes finality in litigation, prevents inconsistent…

  9. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · June 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Russell v. Illinois Central Railroad Company (2015)

    …Cir. 1987); Muzzleman v. Nat. Rail Passenger Corp., 839 F.Supp. 1094, 1096-1097 (D.Del. 1993); Ford v. Nat. R. Passenger Corp., 734 F.Supp. 215 (D.Md.1990); Lyons v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co.…