5 results for “Ford Motor Company”
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013
Ford Motor Co. v. Boomer (2013)
The Supreme Court of Virginia reversed the jury verdict and judgment for the estate against Ford and Honeywell (Bendix) because of the "substantial contributing factor" jury instructions, and remanded for further proceedings under a multiple-sufficient…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 1992 · in the opinion
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Watson (1992)
…984, 989, 128 S.E.2d 273, 277 (1962) (citations omitted). See also Ford Motor Co. v. Phelps, 239 Va. 272, 276, 389 S.E.2d 454, 457 (1990); General Motors Corp. v. Lupica, 237 Va…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · November 19, 2015 · in the opinion
Wilson v. AC&S, Inc. (2015)
…it is more likely than not" that plaintiff's alleged exposure to asbestos from defendant's product "occurred prior to the development" of his illness and "was sufficient to cause" his illness. Ford Motor Co. v…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013 · in the opinion
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Minton (2013)
…proceedings if he be so advised. \[1\] We have today rejected the substantial contributing factor analysis of proximate causation in cases tried under Virginia law when multiple sufficient causation is alleged. Ford Motor Co. v. Boomer…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · October 11, 2018 · in the opinion
Quisenberry v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2018)
…factor' in the duty assessment under Pennsylvania law." (citation omitted)); Cf. Miller v. Ford Motor Co., 740 N.W.2d 206, 209-10 (Mich. 2007) (holding the owner of "property on which asbestos-containing products were…