No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

11 results for “Ford Motor Company”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · August 10, 2018 · in the opinion

    Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec LLC (2018)

    (Ford MTE Castleman at 6.) However, the court notes that pursuant to Rule 703, an expert may disclose otherwise inadmissible underlying facts or data "if their probative value in helping the jury evaluate the opinion substantially…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 17, 2018 · in the opinion

    Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2018)

    …the brands of brakes he worked on at Dexter, Mr. Jack testified that "\[s\]ome of them \[were\] Ford." (Id. at 131:17-20.) When Plaintiffs' counsel asked Mr. Jack if he used the arc grinder …

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    Jack v. Dco, LLC (2019)

    …those he encountered at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard." (Resp. DCo at 11; Resp. Ford at 12.) In particular, Plaintiffs emphasize that Mr. Jack testified in his deposition that, while he was working at the Shipyard…

  4. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · April 3, 2017 · in the opinion

    Woo v. General Electric Company (2017)

    …9\]. . . . In addition, there are some cases where the combination of two sound products creates a dangerous condition, and both manufacturers have a duty to warn. \[Ford Motor Co. v. Wood, 119 Md. App. 1, 34…

  5. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · November 10, 2008 · in the opinion

    Kimball v. Asbestos Corporation Ltd. (2008)

    …her\] product, and (b) the user or consumer has not bought the product from or entered into any contractual relation with the seller. \[16\] See Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., 75 Wn.2d 522, 532, 452…

  6. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 9, 2012 · in the opinion

    Macias v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2012)

    …been acknowledged in this state under the common law. Upon adoption of the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A (1965) in Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., 75 Wash.2d 522, 531-32, 452 P.2d 729 (1969)…

  7. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · November 1, 2018 · in the opinion

    Rublee v. Carrier Corp. (2018)

    …Falk v. Keene Corp., 113 Wash.2d 645, 649, 782 P.2d 974 (1989) (quoting Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 102 Wash.2d 208, 212, 683 P.2d 1097 (1984)). 1222 ¶ 56 In contrast, the apparent…

  8. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2017 · in the opinion

    Rublee v. Carrier Corporation (2017)

    …466, 472, 804 P.2d 659 (1991); RCW 4.22.920. \[22\] Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., 75 Wn.2d 522, 452 P.2d 729 (1969) (applying § 402A strict product liability to manufacturers); Seattle-First Nat…

  9. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2016 · in the opinion

    Rublee v. Carrier Corp. (2016)

    …466, 472, 804 P.2d 659 (1991); RCW 4.22.920. \[22\] Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., 75 Wash.2d 522, 452 P.2d 729 (1969) (applying § 402A strict product liability to manufacturers); Seattle-First Nat…

  10. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · October 15, 1987 · in the opinion

    Lockwood v. AC & S, Inc. (1987)

    …itself and the consumer's expectations. Davis, at 72. Thus, in Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 102 Wn.2d 208, 212-13, 683 P.2d 1097, 47 A.L.R.4th 609 (1984), we held that…

  11. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 4, 1991 · in the opinion

    Koker v. Armstrong Cork, Inc. (1991)

    …483, 744 P.2d 357 (1987), review denied, 110 Wn.2d 1007 (1988). See also Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 102 Wn.2d 208, 209, 683 P.2d 1097, 40 A.L.R.4th 609, (1984…